搜索结果: *

daumor 说:

the addition of a diplomacy envoy hireable to your capitol would be great, too! That way you wouldn't have to go all the way to sargoth just to tell ragnar he's a *****. Send an envoy. Preferably some one who is expendable

点击展开...

Gogol Khan 说:

The Mercenary 说:

We're planning on fleshing out diplomacy more.

点击展开...

Yihaa!

I am one of those idiots that like diplomacy and strategy too! Oh! and tactical choices as well

I mean, the guy is kinda right. Allies don't declare war on each others for no reason or out of the blue. Now, it doesn't mean the AI has to be stupid. For example, if they see a big disparity between your strength and theirs, they might be tempted to declare war, no matter how good your rep is... Tough world! But you should kinda see it coming by them "picking" on you (asking you for bribe money, ransoming your caravans...) and, if time and distance were a bit more realistic, a 'signal' could have been some of their lords tresspassing on your territories...

Alll of that would be accompanied by potential loss of relationship, unless you meakly give in - trying to buy yourself time.

Forming strong defensive/offensive alliance would be great! ... i.e. something deliberate rather than just happening to be at peace with a given a kingdom that is also at war with one of your enemy...

点击展开...

Swadius 说:

Recruiting prisoners is done through the camp menu if I recall correctly.

点击展开...

Kinsume 说:

Issue with this plan is the fact that when the Faction's king gets pissed with you and sends him and about 6 of his lords with him to hit your one castle. Then playing defensive won't do much for ya xD Your best bet is to get a good starting town and pay off the people you took it from. Build up yourself a nice base of troops there and start working your way out from it. As you take a new castle/town give it to a level 20+ companion or hire yourself a lord or something to watch over it and give you more armies to work with. Also get the buildings for elite troops and patrols asap to help defend your borders some.

点击展开...

Kinsume 说:

Well it's a war based game sorry guy, if you want freedom to build up your places and character unstopped go play the sims or something >_>

点击展开...

Niam 说:

Kinsume 说:

I'm fairly sure it's random, however you can sue them for peace. With 21 positive relation you might not even have to pay.

点击展开...

Pretty sure it went from 21 to -40 when they declare war doesn't it?

点击展开...

Lorenzo. 说:

He means if they all can run together without causing a crash or a bug.

点击展开...

Gallus Domesticus 说:

The blade itself also has to be taken into consideration.
This is, afterall, a modern reproduction of a 16th century sword.

The time period of mount blade is mid-13th century, when a sword of this quality is utterly impossible due to the poor quality of steel/iron availible for mass-produced swords of the common soldiers.
Though losing an arm or leg is possible in unarmoured combat it is not a common event as most troops of the time would be armoured one way or another. Leather, padded cloths, gambesons all make it more difficult to sever an arm or leg.

Just imagine wrapping few layers of cloth on your raw steak and then try cutting it in one chop.



The most important thing remains that if this feature ever gets implemented, and arms and heads flies everywhere, Mount and Blade would end up being banned from stores or otherwise be targeted by every anti-violence parent activist group you can find in this damn continent(and europe.........+australia..........)

点击展开...