搜索结果: *

MadocComadrin 说:

Egarb 说:

I know what's realistic, and your arguments are not.

点击展开...

Care to back that up with anything? Because quite frankly, I don't see your "realism credibility." I can fetch one of our resident woodsmen to back me up on the throwing-knife case if you like.

点击展开...

Amontadillo 说:

...

It's quite patently obvious that hardly anyone in this thread knows what is realistic, and even where they do, they are choosing to forget that.

点击展开...

MadocComadrin 说:

Egarb 说:

You guys are taking it a bit too fare about my love for realism 

点击展开...

If you have such a love for realism, you would be more aware of what's realistic.

点击展开...

Ringwraith #5 说:

Egarb 说:

I hope they don't have dual wielding. I can't see what's good about it.

点击展开...

It adds more variety to combat, for one thing.

Suspicious Pilgrim 说:

Only for weapons you can't block with, I'd be okay with, like butchering knives.

点击展开...

Are you kidding, parrying was historically one of the main reasons why you'd want to use an off-hand weapon. That's part of the reason why I've always advocated shifting M&B2 to a later historical period. You really don't get much of this stuff in the middle ages, but later on you have lots of crazy weapons like spring-operated trident daggers or daggers with slots in the blade designed to trap the opponent's sword's blade. IMO those would make combat way more interesting than simple swords and shields. But no, it's going to be the same old boring crap again. Le sigh.

点击展开...

tansvanio 说:

So you would let anyone throw a knife at you becomse its completely non lethal? I think if a throwing knife gets jammed in your throat your pretty much gone. Éspecially in medieval times. I would like to see some hardcore mode with infection, injuries and blood loss since we are aproaching this subject.

点击展开...

Green Apostol 说:

Egarb 说:

Sounds existing.

点击展开...

*Exciting.

点击展开...