搜索结果: *

SpectreSC 说:

It's not fantasy so to label it such is just silly from any point of view. It's also not ahistorical at all, just because it wasn't used on a battlefield. It was actually used in history so it's historical in context and by nature. I understand what Bannerlord is about and nowhere did I say I wanted this in use for open warfare or in open combat, but Bannerlord also has Gang Wars and Civilian encounters, Arenas and Tournaments, so why can't we have it there?

It has it's use and it's place in Bannerlord, it was a form of combat and it was used throughout history, so where's the disconnect here? I don't see the issue. And if someone wants to run around on the battlefield wielding two swords, that's their preference as well. They might not survive often but that's on them.

点击展开...

SpectreSC 说:

I mean, my man there is plenty of historical evidence of it's use that make's it common. It was used throughout history in various cases, just because it wasn't used on the battlefield does not make it uncommon. It just makes it impractical and that's okay. No one is saying otherwise lol. I'm perfectly fine with them implementing this because it was realistic, even if impractical.

It should absolutely be in the base game if the game allows for it because it's a form of combat.



Yes there are because it's historically accurate and was used, no matter what scenarios it was in. You can't say it isn't historically accurate when there's clear proof throughout history, lmao. Nor can you argue against it's inclusion unless you just don't like dual-wield, personally, and that's fine. It's your opinion but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be included

点击展开...

SpectreSC 说:

I just pointed out plenty of historical evidence above, I'll requote my post so you can clearly see it was used and not uncommon.



See the above for a good analysis and proof of the use of dual-wielding. I didn't prove your point at all, I'm merely stating that it's use was more prevalent amongst those who had no need for shields, (i.e. Knights in plate, Single Combat duels, etc.) It also wouldn't need to be restricted to one part of the game if implemented because you'd never be dumb enough to go without a shield in open combat.

If they do include it, it'd be great for other scenarios in the game already.

点击展开...

Mppqlmd 说:

And how often did people use throwing knives on a medieval battlefield ?

点击展开...

SpectreSC 说:

It was used on the battlefield, just not practically by the masses. Unless you wore full-plate or were fighting in Japan during the Sengoku period, or you were a Viking raiding coastal villages, then you wouldn't really use two weapons. Most levies and even standing armies would prefer Shield and Sword/Spear over dual-wield for the brunt of their force because "arrows", among other things.

点击展开...

WhiteEyedSh4rk 说:

They had rain on a multiplayer map for some time, so it will definitely be added.

And many players already have fps and cpu problems, swaying trees would make it worse as long as these problems still exist.

点击展开...