搜索结果: *

Probably suggested numerous times already, but still a good idea.

Rundstedt75 说:

Have elephants been used in military campaigns IRL?

点击展开...

Yes they have. However the climate was africa-asia. Think wars inside the lion king kind of world, with tribal warriors.

TheLordDschingisKahn 说:

Umm,i'm a bit of a noob.How does this,"weapon editor" thingy work?Where is it? (Is it in the configure box?The one that says allow editing?How's it work?)
Sorry for aksing so many questions,i'm just curious.Never tried it.

点击展开...

Item editor program deep in the forge somewhere. I'm also somewhat of a fan of Dchingis Kahn, especially Moskau.

I'd rather see borders themselves. You know, stone walls separating the factions, with 3 or 4 paths through said wall. If an enemy army touches the hole, a messenger is sped off to the nearest city to prepare a repelling force, then runs off to the next city to get another, etc. These repelling forces are a fraction of the garisson, so maybe if all 4 cities have 1000 troops, you'd face 10% of all 4 cities. 400 recruits or footmen, since the big guys are needed at home. So you have to fight to even enter their lands. Might have the option to destroy a small section of wall though. But troop units of that faction in range of the breaking in question also alerts the fuzz. Basically I'd like to see more opposition, as it is you can wander freely around their main cities, even the king's house to say "sup, I have all your castles and cities except this one".

DamienZharkoff 说:

Anything else I forgot to add to your "Pipe Dream" list?

点击展开...

You forgot dragons.

That would indicate there was a storyline and that everything wasn't determined randomly on game creation. Which, amazingly, it is.

Seekster 说:

Hmm...So out of curiosity how many people stock beef? 

点击展开...

I do, actually.

Vilhjalmr 说:

I'm not a fan of preemptive flaming.

点击展开...

Whatever.

Vilhjalmr 说:

Will you shut the **** up? At least Seekster's posts are entertaining and have a point.

点击展开...

Will you still think it's entertaining when he polls people on wether or not they stock beef for their troops? It won't stop until he polls everything in the game!

There I am, running through the Mount&Blade Discussion forum, when all of a sudden I am assaulted by an army of Seekster polls!

I quickly duck behind the Khergit bow vs. War bow topic, and grab the Bastard Sword? topic and Favorite Shield topic to defend myself. I lead the polls down the list to the what to do , after u have conquer the wole map? topic, for polls are weak against bad grammar. I circle around, and omgwtf slash them into oblivion.

And then, the day was saved for the Mount&Blade Discussion forum.

I'm sorry, I just still don't see elephants as being a good battle tactic. Sure, they're big, but not BIG as in the beast that Legolas took down in the lord of the rings. And Gimli said "That still counts as one!"

Elephants would probably be 3 times the cost of a spirited charger because of its rarity due to widely varied climate that Calradia has, and still be as easily killed as a saddle horse. If not even more so, with the much larger hit box. Instead of squeaking through a narrow gap in sea raiders and a single axe grazing your horse, there'd be multiple axes in your elephant. Projectiles would also NEVER MISS, because it's so big.

I know what you're thinking. "If the player wants to be stupid and bring a giant bullseye mount to battle he can.", but that's generally wrong.

Imagine how the factions would feel about elephants. Nords and Rhodoks are already out of the question, because their troops don't use horses. Khergits wouldn't want them either, because they're too slow and too big. This leaves Swadians and Vaegirs. A swadian knight would not be caught dead on an elephant, because then their weapons would be unusable. Now, this leaves only the vaegirs, who live in the snow. So who would use these elephants? The knights? then their weapons are useless. The marksmen? Then you've got 10 marksmen, one of them on an elephant. Does that make sense?

So, how many merchants do you think would breed and sell elephants when the only person who would consider them a mount for combat is the player himself?

skald 说:

I'd like to see a more sophisticated melee combat system involving stances and attacks that flow from them. Lookt at manuals by Talhoffer and Liechtenhauer.

点击展开...

Weapon attacks are supposed to be ugly. It's not like a medieval army is a dance troop.

I used to love scimitars too, until it caused my defeat in one of those 3 vs 5 end-siege things. One handed weapons are utterly useless in that situation to me. Has to be a two hander buried in their backs when they attack my companions.

Verito 说:

Apparently, you can eat people's flesh and organs without dying, but if you eat someones brain, you become ill and die.

Of course, this is just a rumour so far....

点击展开...

Bull. Otherwise cow brains wouldn't be so tasty.

Edit: Why do I keep forgetting that I posted already?! 

Eh. I don't like it. If you think about it, all damage types have a delayed death.

G36E 说:

IF you're going to be using that metaphor, we're using a six-shooter right now.
IF you're going to use the ingame bit, that's what we're campaigning for, so either drop the opposition or oppose multi-faction battles.

点击展开...

I oppose 3-way battles but support 7-way battles. Just because, like 3-way battles, 7-way battles are also possible. So STFU. 

Just give nord footmen a sumpter horse and change their name to scout. Of course I believe that non-cavalry units should also have the chance to get a horse, because if they can afford plate armor they can get a stupid horse. And all leaders would enjoy the option of more horses on the field.

G36E 说:

@Triosta

3) Have you a screenshot of a faction at war with 6 others? Please post, then we'll talk.

点击展开...

点击展开...

I don't have to post a screenshot of it, because it's possible. I remember playing warrider, and whenever you encountered a group that was 5 times larger than your group, you couldn't attack, just run away or surrender. Why is this related? Because it was changed due to the fact that it's possible to win against those odds. If there's any chance for such a wide-scale battle occuring, it should be followed through to the end instead of wimped. Why would there be only 3 way battles and not 7 if there was enough participants? It's like a revolver that only has 3 chambers and wasted space in the spinner.

Pegasus 说:

Hi there,

Allthought I got 2 Khergit Lancers and one Sword sister they don't follow me when I attack bandits of caravans or anyway..

And the cavalry is the 95% of total army since there should be more infantry from my hired blades. What's wrong and what to do to make them follow me? I don't think that I'm gonna need any editor
Thanks.

点击展开...

The troops that don't follow your commands are the ones that got arrows to go in one ear and out the other, making them deaf.

Seekster 说:

Wonder if it would be too much to ask for a sticky 

点击展开...

Yes, it would be asking too much.