搜索结果: *

Me too, it crashes a lot.

armagan 说:

This is most probably a driver bug since our usage of DirectX is pretty standard. Neverthless, we will definitely look into this and try to come up with a solution. Unfortunately we don't have an ATi 4x machine yet but we'll get one and then hopefully sort it out.

点击展开...

Don't forget that there is another issue (but perhaps the cause is the same, surely) with both the 2x00 line and the 3x00 line (and don't know if the 1x00 line is also affected). The game looks like this
http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Image:Mount%26Blade_texture_error.jpg

coreone 说:

I have a 4850, and im dealing with the red texture issue.  I just checked ati's website they released the 8.9 drivers lets hope it fixes the problem.

点击展开...

Nope. I tried the 8.9 yesterday.

I still find funny how the only game broken by the Ati drivers is Mount & Blade. I can play Team Fortress 2, Mercenaries 2, Crysis, Spore, Stalker, Bioshock, Mass Effect, Assasins Creed, Red Alert 3 Beta, Company of Heroes, ET: Quake Wars, Gal Civ 2, and much more (http://www.xfire.com/profile/turintur/ ) without problems with these drivers, without problems in the textures or in the shaders. Are we sure the problem is in the Catalyst drivers and not in the game?

astat 说:

okay now that 1.0 apparently is in the hands of some elitist bastards already, could we get an update by one of them? has our display issue been fixed, or are we still confined to DX7 even with m&b 1.0?

点击展开...

The latter.

KaelGotRice 说:

TurinTurambar 说:

It feels unfinished because it is an indie game. Sorry to burst your bubble, but it was never going to have the polish, the graphics and the amount of content of a AAA game with a budget of millions of dollars.

点击展开...

You've never played "Cave Story".

点击展开...

Actually yes, i have played Cave Story XD XD. I almost finished it, i reached until the end boss.

And obviously you can't compare Cave Story to Mount & Blade, much less to GTA4 or Crysis or whatever.

It feels unfinished because it is an indie game. Sorry to burst your bubble, but it was never going to have the polish, the graphics and the amount of content of a AAA game with a budget of millions of dollars.

TacKY 说:

USE DX7 jessh

点击展开...

Fix the game jeez. I can name your right now 30 games that works without problem in my computer, with this graphic card and these drivers.

I am sooo happy right now:





Latest drivers, Ati 2900XT.

Warger 说:

And then you guys find that the official new version has lots of awesome stuff and those who downloaded the leaked version have to pay again.

点击展开...

Pay again, lol. You will always can download the full game, as the full game is the demo, as everyone here know.

Perhaps the retail version is 1.001, more advanced than this version, so then we will download again. No problem.

Archonsod 说:

8.5 and later Catalyst drivers won't work properly with M&B

点击展开...

I have the same problem, graphical corruption in almost all the textures, with Directx 9.

So.. when the devs are supposed to fix this problem? The 'leaked' 1.0 version is still the same. Last catalyst drivers here, in 2900XT.

In this same forum in the "common problem & fixes" it says:

"(2) The game runs but fonts show incorrectly or some graphics are distorted.

Such issues are typically related to an outdated graphics card driver. You should download and install the latest driver offered by your graphics chip manufacturer."

Well, seems like we can't follow this solution!

LaaFen 说:

1680x1050 + everything maxed and no dizziness.

点击展开...

Same here. Of course, i never had dizziness in a game, first or third person, whatever.

Badbru 说:

Well, there's seven guys that are going to get bored with this game soon after editing all the challenge out of it.

点击展开...

Lol, i only want an opportuniy to finish an enemy faction. I have around 28 hours in the game and the situation of territory ownership is still the same as the beginning, when someone takes a city, one week after the other side takes it back or capture a enemy city so everything is the same.

And even now that i have a 200 soldiers company, i have to flee against +600 armies. And let's not speak about the maintenace of 200 soldiers. It's expensive.

In fact, after all the modifications i did to my charisma, leadership, morale and food, it's still not enough. The game is still broken. One party (mine) can't attack and defend in every place, and i can't count with the stupid AI to do a good work. Waiting for 0.96, with better AI and a faster renown rate adquisiton.

I understand that the basis of the game is that you are a captain of small "mercenary" force helping the faction you choose, so it's normal that you aren't as powerful as the main armies. But there has to be a limit, if your company of soldiers have a maximum around 50 (well, you can raise it still more with renown until infinity, but that would require infinite time, 50 is more a realistic number) then the maximum of the NPC armies should be around 200-250. 4-5 times more, so there is still armies you have to run away when you see it, you can't fight and win against everything, but it wouldn't be so unbalanced.

Thanks!

Just yesterday i was trying to do the same thing, editing my charisma and leadership, etc. Also, you should edit the items.txt and modify the amount of food in every food item, because with big parties you will have a supply problem.

quiet420 说:

Lyx 说:

quiet420 说:

Kings have alot of renknown, they can have a large army.....

点击展开...

No they dont. Check it for yourself.

点击展开...

Ok, kings SHOULD have alot of renknown even though they don't, but because the gods of caladria are just just, they have ensured that kings can command many 'o' men.

statisfied?

点击展开...

Even with a score of 1500 in renown or some crazy high number like that, it's impossible following the rules of the game to have armies so big.

Let's face it. There is no cap in the numbers of the AI parties, both in total maxium of soldiers and total maxium of prisioners. I have seen armies with 300 prisioners, or close ot it, you would need a score of 60 in prisoner management for that number.

Obviously the people who say "then just attack before their numbers grow so high" are missing the point. The point is to fix the game so it isn't needed to rush the enemy before the unbalancing gameplay shows or use little exploits with the AI (for example, separate the war parties advancing little by little forward and backwards) to kill them.

Theo 说:

You are complaining about too big armies when you are playing alone against whole Calradia. If you would play with faction then lot of your troubles would go away.

Lyx 说:

Mongoli 说:

Well, I don't have that much of a problem with the insanely big armies the other Lords have, it's just that I'd like to have a decent-sized army as well. That way I don't need to borrow so many friendly lords to conquer a city or a castle.

点击展开...

Heh, you're asuming being part of one of the builtin factions - but try resisting those massive armies as a bandit king with ONE army!

点击展开...

点击展开...

Except the AI faction is totally stupid.

Hank 说:

Clypse 说:

Hey guys!
Im sure you all noticed that it is REALLY hard to get that marshal rank, so I believe that there should be a renown and HONOR cheat,
I don't exactly think the cheat is necisary but I think it would be useful to some players... Either that or INCREASING the amount of Renown gained from battles so that we can ACTUALLY get there within a reasonable amount of time!
Tell me what you guys think!

点击展开...

A lot of other things (good weapons, armor, horses, and troops) are EXTREMELY easy to get, so I personally think that the way renown and honour are given is a good system, because it means you actually have to take TIME to get it.

点击展开...

So how much TIME do i have to play before i get to be Marshall? Becuase i already have played 20 hours in a game, the marshall has been elected two times, and i still haven not been a competitor to the title. Around the 16th hour the game began to be more frustating than fun. The game pace is not well balanced in that sense.

Gothic Knight 说:

Heh..I've had an 1000men nord army plus a few allies of the nords besiege me.What I did was look around,sign and get the hell out of my fief.Sadly my old .950 character owns no fiefs,-7000honor,nothing to show for all the extradinary action movie slaying I did.Hell,my guy should be named TurinTurambar.

点击展开...

I will be honored.

Fei Dao 说:

@Turin - Wrong again my friend. Lords do follow the same restrictions to their normal party size.

However, lords often liberate prisoners, and that's how they obtain massive party sizes.

点击展开...

Wrong again. I also liberate prioners when i can (hey, free soldiers for only a slight penalty morale!) and still have around 45 men, not around 450-550.

Zaro 说:

I'm pretty sure you're all wrong and that lords already follow the same rules as the player, they're just much further along in stats and renown. At least that is how it worked in .903. The only lords that have "unfair" bonuses are kings, so it's not what I would call unfair.

点击展开...

No i already checked it. I have 220 renown, i can have a party of 43. A Lord with 430 renown (twice) had an army of 320!. Perhaps he was a level 170 with Charisma at 110....