搜索结果: *

This is why called "beta" all these numbers will be adjusted for final patch.

Full week of fixes, congrats TW!

Timmortal 说:

devs dont waste you time on implementing something like this, make actually useful additions. If some people cant handle women in games, let some like "minded" indvidual make a mod for it. Unless these people also want to see game functions implemented like sieges lasting ingame months, not days, and 30% of their troops dying of dysentery, or the revoval og all armors and weapons that are several 100 years out of their time period, then i dont give much for "it breaks my immersion".

点击展开...

Well said.

Here myself playing with a female hero.

Karl_Magnus 说:

Snowballing isn't necessarily a ''player beating the AI's kingdoms'' issue, it's also about immersion and how the AI makes weird moves strategically and realistically.

点击展开...

Something they already improved a lot compared to first EA version

Varrak 说:

+1. Snowballing has already killed those saves, and that people can still play with old saves by using beta tab of the game in steam.

点击展开...

My friend continued his campaign and killed almost 50% of the snowballing in his game. People often prefer to abandon, quit or just say the game is broken, that's the sad true story.

Good job TW! each day we get a better game.

Thats a great feedback! thank you @Mephistopholees.

Caps 说:

dont rly wanna be locked in with pleb teams tbh

点击展开...

Hah yeah, I get that but there must be something. For example penalty only when you still have options to play, if you don't have more points to respawn, you could leave. Or something like that.

One more:

- Put a penalty for MP for those leaving the match. A 10min delay or something, nothing too big but something to avoid people leaving so easy.

Just move from day 1 to the culture/faction territory you want to play.

It would be cool to have a random spawn system for every new game, but we all start in same center location.

TheSoulReaver03 说:

Having to restart the game every day is just not something most people will want to do.

点击展开...

?¿

I did not start my game again, zero issues for now.

DruGs 说:

I did a test with my 1.0.1 save 2 days ago on patch 1.0.3, where I went in on the save and saved the game. When I went out again and looked at the save it now said 1.0.3 on the save. So think it works... somehow....
I know it was a different case with warband

点击展开...

It's weird becuase the game give us that alert message about modules but TW not said anything about we must start a new game to see all changes or fixes. Thank you for the reply DruGs.

Adrivan 说:

I have a campaign that was started on patch 1.0.3, do I need to create a new one to see full effect of the changes or can I continue?

点击展开...

I have the same question.. I started yesterday, when I load my game it says has different modules. We have to start a new game to see all changes or we can continue with our old campaign?

Thank you TW!

Keep the hard work!

Lorenzzo 说:

The ignorance on how software development works in this thread is astounding.

点击展开...

True words.

Is sooo easy to just talk from a player perspective, easy and comfortable.

^ constructive criticism is not part of his mastery skills I guess. He keep saying the same all the time.

This is simple, If you don't like it and you wont spend time testing and reporting bugs, stop and move on. Find another game and wait until you think the game worth your money and your time. EA means you will find bugs, exploits, unfinished game... but seems like you did not understand that.

Thank you guys for posting.

RyanTactics 说:

I think what you mean to say is field battles?
Also I think we need something to change with the UI or some sort of direction for the general playerbase that doesn't understand they have to capture or defend the flags in siege. People still don't know you can hit the alt key to see objectives. It kills games because of the time people think they're just playing glorified field battles.

点击展开...

Yeah, field battles exactly like we see playing single campaign, there are some cool scenarios there. Agree about lot of new players only plays for kills, but sieges are there for a reason, there are objetives..always hard to balance that and keep playing as a team.

Flash118 说:

enabel tking in all modes? siege and tdm would not be playable.

点击展开...

Not all, just in some modes or just add enable/disable for each mode so you could find servers with both options.

Brecken 说:

Rather than actual team damage which would turn it into a mess (can always be used on custom servers however when we get them), reflective damage would serve the same purpose without the risk of people just teamkilling for the hell of it.
It would force archers to aim more carefully, no throwing javs through friendlies in the big mosh pits to hit people they're fighting, people actually swinging overhead instead of sideways when there's 4 of them trying to kill 1 opponent.

点击展开...

Reflective damage sounds like a fair option, many things they can add to give us options and more ways to play the game.