搜索结果: *

Not sure about #1, but #2 sounds like you have HDR on. Never turn HDR on.

Jeez we're old.

I thought Rams went into economics, not game design.

Kinda looks like Bioshock meets Fallout meets WoW

Then you should also know you can't knock out certain troops, who are scripted to die no matter what. Doesn't make much sense to sell the undead to a slave galley.

There's a level limit for prisoners you can hire. Prisoners above a certain level cannot be hired to your party. Likewise, there are some enemies that cannot be knocked unconscious, mostly troops that are meant to be undead, but also make sure that the mace you're using actually does blunt damage. User error does not mean the system is bad, lol.

There was a WhatsApp for awhile, but I haven't heard about it in a couple of years so I imagine it'd been deprecated in favor of the... various discords. I think there are at least three.

Signed or unsigned? Very important distinction.

What's the age difference?

My guess is that there are probably other underlying issues going on and that the sandwich was just a convenient springboard into that sort of exchange. Have you guys had any tension lately?

No.

Gorvex answered that question above. There is no separate patch.

I'm not sure what you expected, Densetsu is a very fickle man :p

I think your sarcasm meters are broken.

You're right, that sounds pretty ****ing awful, dude.

rektasaurus 说:

I don’t believe men are more likely to succeed at suicide, I think they’re more likely to be suicided

点击展开...

Bruh ****ing moment, lmao. You've just shot dead every last ounce of your credibility. That is conspiracy theory grade bull. This is literally one of the first things you learn in gender studies, social issues, or psych. The statistics are as such: Women attempt suicide more often, men attempt suicide less often, but succeed disproportionately, due to the usage of more violent methods of suicide than women.

rektasaurus 说:

elevate women to the same position as men and that is a paradigm which is discriminatory

点击展开...

Do you actually read what you write?

Oh no, I'm not disputing that his post was topical - it is, just that that question isn't the sole purpose of this thread like he seems to believe is all. That said, as far as the matter of the name goes, it does sorta make sense that one might read the earlier conversation about the subject.

The original prompt isn't necessarily the topic, though. It's not a singular-minded thread whose sole question is "Is the name 'Feminism' discriminatory" (It isn't) but rather a place for the discussion of feminism in general.