搜索结果: *

  1. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    ganso 说:
    Thats exactly it, when many lords answer you with the "Long live...", usually the faction is pretty stable, and you should move on and try to convince lords from another faction. I finally managed to get a couple of lords to join me, but I had to try it about 3~5 times, even with the right answer, good relations and 99 rtr.

    I appreciate the information thnx ganso
  2. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    ganso 说:
    First you have to ask him how he feels about his liege, if he allows you to try and convince him there will be an option asking for his support on the "throne of Europe", and then there will be 5 or 6 different reasons that you can use to convince him, but I'm not sure how much they would affect the result. After that he will tell you whether he's going to join you or stay loyal to his liege, and that's the part where I still haven't got through.

    Then it seems in my case, as I've continued talking to other Lords, they must be happy with their Liege as they've replied "Long Live...." whoever their King is.
    Thanks for the reply as that was what I was looking for & answers my question.
  3. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    I had the dialogue opportunity and tried, although I couldn't convince any of the lords yet. And I have 93 of RTR and 20+ of relations, I guess I chose the wrong option when trying to convince them.

    Can you be more specific on which dialogue string you are referring to so I can compare to what I have tried?
  4. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    Have other people been able to get other factions' Lords to join their Player Kingdom using this mod with Manpower turned Off?

  5. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    Korinov 说:
    Hmm, as far as I know, you should be able to recruit lords from other faction by asking them to join you... well, at least you should be able to ask them in the first place. I don't remember we've implemented anything that denies the player such possibility. How much Right to Rule do you have?

    33 RTR

    My main question/concern is that I cannot find anything which looks as if it would even initiate a conversation to join my kingdom.

    I've tried during war, while not at war, with low relations, high relations, in the field, at their castles ( etc...), but simply have either missed it or cannot find it any options.

    I thought one time I was going to get lucky when I asked one general to speak in private (most of the ones I ask refuse), & he agreed. I then asked him about how he feels about his king, but that led to nothing as well as he stated something like "Long live King X"

    Do I need a certain amount of RTR before that option comes up?

    Have other people been able to get nobles to join their Player Kingdom using this mod with Manpower turned Off?

    If, yes, then what specifically needs to be done? What are the literally steps & text menus/options you are using?
  6. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    Dijabola 说:
    Dude if you want to recruit other faction lords with relation 50+ than you are insane! If that where so I would go and do quests with all lords of Europe 1200 and recruit them all -.=  That was the stupiest suggestion I ever heard on Europe 1200 forum

    I didn't make any suggestions.
    I was merely asking a question & gave some examples of what I have tried.
  7. Is there a way to gain/recuit lords with Manpower disabled?

    Using version 0.14 w/ a clean install I am not playing with Manpower as I didn't want to have Lords flipping side at the onset of losing their last holdings, but I thought I would still have the ability to attempt to recruit factions' lords if I had good relations (ie 50+) with them. However...
  8. Troop type trees & Kingdom culture

    So if I understand correctly, what you are saying is that regardless of where you start, regardless of if you were once a noble of faction X, that upon founding your own kingdom you are no longer considered Irish/English/Germany etc...... but instead will now belong to a type of default Feudal Western European faction that gets a generic tree for Seargent/Nobles, correct?

    Furthermore that you believe "Feudal" option (western european) is in place, but that the "Arabic"/"Islamic" has probly not been added, right?


    Thanks again for replies
  9. National Order of Calatrava taking ownership of Pamplona?

    thnx for the reply

    that's what it looks like so far based upon the behavior I am seeing (other Orders also have Cities and Villages as well, for quite some time actually); however, that was the first time I was able to specifically verify that no other unit was present from the beginning to the end of the siege except for the single unit from the Order of Calatrava.
  10. National Order of Calatrava taking ownership of Pamplona?

    Running version .14 From the Info page it meantions that ""Orders can only hold castles. If an Order conquers a town, or a castle with a village beloning to it, they will not keep the town and the villages, only the castle. All Towns and villages will go to their liege faction instead."" In a...
  11. Troop type trees & Kingdom culture

    Running Version .14 It seems that your Seargent/Noble troop tree will never change, but that the serf/militia troop trees will always be based upon the original fief culture; hence, the culture that I am classified as is critical since it dictates my top tier troops throughout the life of the...
  12. Europe 1200 reputation gain/loss

    Cruger 说:
    Deca Warband 说:
    If I have created my own Kingom & wanted to assign fiefs, does Europe 1200 modify or alter the vanilla reputation gain/loss for assigning fiefs?

    No.

    Thanks for the reply.




    Cruger 说:
    Deca Warband 说:
    Side Note: Where can I find these values in Europe 1200 (I was using TweakMB), and it did not "find" them.

    No clue, maybe Europe 1200 isn't compatible with TweakMB or something like that.

    Although other areas of TweakMB seem to be compatible. The reputation for assigning fiefs does not.
    That's what I was afraid of, as I relied upon TweakMB to alter that parameter (reputation gain/loss for handing out fiefs) in vanilla Warband.

    Just got the .13 and am really impressed with it. 
  13. Europe 1200 reputation gain/loss

    If I have created my own Kingom & wanted to assign fiefs, does Europe 1200 modify or alter the vanilla reputation gain/loss for assigning fiefs? Side Note: Where can I find these values in Europe 1200 (I was using TweakMB), and it did not "find" them. Edit: Forgot to add this is for the...
  14. Considering buying Warband, just a few queries!

    In line with the other suggestions to get a better handle on the multiplayer you should indeed go to the servers which have unlimited lives & low respawn times to be able to get back into the fight more quickly.

    Take note of the rules of the server to now whether or not they have friendly fire enabled & if so whether or not it hurts you or the other player. The speed of the melee, base money, time, etc....

    Note, that in the "Siege" type games many will give the defenders 5 lives, but the attackers have unlimited lives, whereas others have unlimited for both the attacker and defender.

    There's enough people playing multiplayer to find games.

    No, you do not need to have the original M&B.

    There are some noticeable differences in some of the mods as other have pointed out that can change the maner in which you might chose to play (persistant vs non-persistant level/equipment being the more obvious) when compared to the 'standard' version of the game.

    In native each match you start over with whatever value in money the Admin setup the system to be 1000-1500 typical & then keep in mind that for each kill you can make additional money as well as simply surviving gives bonus such as keeping the weapons/shield that you pick up from those who died in the battle, as one example.

    Hope that helps.
  15. Black Shields (BkS) bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks

    Rhade 说:
    <uses the "sounds mad" retort> 

    You're trying to hard, and this isn't the DF forumfail.


    Deca, Aced, Decadence.  It's in my forum name. Nothing to hide.

    Don't care whether you recall me or not. I left the politics long time ago and have not cared about politics since the UO & SB days, and surely did not care about it in DF. I left politics in DF up to others, so your troll comment is missdirected, as I've nothing to prove.

    You, on the other hand, continually display the comical attitude of the young gun slinger wannabe who is throwing a forum tantrum that all of the stories are being told about all the old legends. You want your e-fame and e-notoriety. So you purposely embellish the truth and sprinkle in fact with fiction meanwhile you try to pester and follow around the old gun slingers...trying to bait them so they should duel you, but they look at you and laugh knowing that they have nothing to prove. They've already been there and done that and now just want to relax and enjoy their life.


    So.....you create this thread.

    However, imagine my surprise to see this thread. It was like being in a bar while hearing some guy bragging how he ran one of the bowl games, then turning around to see that the guy speaking was the water boy for one of the teams. If you get called out for being the water boy, I am sure it must sting & hurt, so no doubt you'll try to defend your e-pride.


    Darwoth wasn't & never had been about taking cities, he's all about PK'ing (not PvPing) and scamming peoples guild banks & other antics. He takes peoples loot, not their stones. So the non-factor comment about Darkenbane/SBG is moot as that's his style, and yes he clowned your guild & those threads were quite entertaining to the NA1 server. He's not a nice guy, but he's not the guy making "I won DarkFall so duel me on POM server" on the M&B forums, either.

    If you say that you have no knowledge of those in BkS who hacked/aimbot/used radar, then you're either a poor lier or completely ignorant if you claim to be unaware of your members' activities. I'll wager its a little of both, but you lose e-honor points for still feigning ignorance.


    At its peak, the NA1 server had at least a dozen other guilds who were better at what you boast as your guilds' best achievments. Each of those guilds were those that started on EU then xfered to NA when the move was open. NA1 got utterly wrecked by the guilds that moved from EU. Anyone denying that is lying. Massive alliances were formed to deal with it, BkS did the same.

    Your guild was carried by the other guilds in SF. That's a fact. Both servers went from small scale to massive alliances & BkS was no different, but it was the EU guilds which ran NA1. In the case of SF, let's not pretend to act like we all don't know the best in SF were from EU.


    I am not saying that you are personally bad, nor am I saying that BkS sucks, but anyone claiming the BkS ran NA1 is about as rediculous as a water boy claiming it, and I am merely calling you out. Do I personally know you? Nope, but I didn't personally know the water boy either but that still doesn't make me a troll.


    I didn't know we needed to make a 12th_place_runner_up_yellow_shortbus_DF_Merc_wannabe_guild award but I guess everyone here in taleworlds needs to pitch in and get you a shiny ribbon before you run to the forums and create a 35 page drama "look at me" thread about it.

    ...oh wait....
  16. Black Shields (BkS) bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks

    Orion 说:
    Seems he's got a few bug report posts, too. At least he plays Warband and isn't part of Rhade's crazy fanboy entourage trying to profess their love.

    I was not referring to M&B as the failed game.
    I was referring to DarkFall as the failed game.

    ....and as you stated, looking at my M&B post history would more than indicate that I've nothing to hide. I rarely visit these forums, but help out when I can with updates on the things I find to help the M&B community.
  17. Black Shields (BkS) bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks

    Xeythe 说:
    You're ******** kidding me, right?

    Every single clan you mentioned had hackers in them at one point or another and most of those players quit once they saw their overly developed characters couldn't carry them any further. Out of all of those clans, only VAMP and DHW remains.

    Btw, The Mercs and Rainbow ninjas tried to make a comeback on NA a few months ago. They were there for about a month, but then they were getting their asses kicked because they didn't have stats and skill levels that were 4x higher than everyone elses. Then they quit. Get **** on?


    Everyone knows each of those guilds had hackers. I already acknowledged that fact in my post by saying, "Sure many of them did, but so did you, except you were the 'tards who got caught." Once again we are back to elementary level "They hacked, too" We get it. They all hacked.

    As for what happened a few months ago in DF, it's irrelevant to me if Afghan version#2 tried to make a come back in a failed game that nobody plays.
  18. Black Shields (BkS) bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks bks

    [quote author=Rhade]
    Black Shields

    Black Shields [/b]<insert revisionsit history of a dead game and server> [/quote]

    That Rhade kid must be smoking crack!

    It's comical to see some clown attempt to go to another game in a sad attempt at trying to spin lies to rewrite his failed past.

    All of the good guilds were on the original EU server, and then many moved to NA1.
    Your guild was considered wellknown hackers and comedy central jokes on NA1. 

    Let us not forget how many of you guild got utterly clowned by being revealed as hackers by Darwoth from Darkenbane. That was some good popcorn eating threads with screenshot and vids of them hacking, ehhh? For some fun, visit their website. Gold!

    Oh, and how about those guys who were dumb enough to use their guild names from BkS on other hacker websites that ran several aimbot and tracking programs. Classic!

    ...but wait, then your guild got into a highschool level spats and tried to divert attention by mentioning other guild who "hacked too" or who hacks worse and started naming names of other who did it, too. Sure many of them did, but so did you, except you were the 'tards who got caught. Real stand up kind'a guys, eh?


    Let's get something straight, never heard of BkS on EU1 (so if you were there, you were a 100% non-factor) and as for NA1 it was these guilds that were getting hired as mercs.

    Fatality
    Brutality
    MERCS
    VAMP
    Nemesis
    Rainbow Ninjas
    Desperate Housewives
    etc...etc...


    Hell, lets be honest, when the big dogs from EU came over to NA1, it was the other guilds in the SF alliance that carried BkS. If you say otherwise, your not just a lier, but clearly delusional.

    Try not to rewrite history because some of us were actually on BOTH servers and played since Beta in that craptastic game that you somehow think defines your guild despite the fact that there were literally a dozen other guilds who excelled at what you claimed to be your area of proficiency.


    Carry on winner. You can do it!
  19. Hosted Non-Dedicated multiplayer games not seen on server list UPDATED

    Update:

    Circumnavigating the Router worked.

    Afterwards, I made numerous different attempts to Host with the router & all did not matter excepts for one --- Using an option within the Router to run my PC server for hosting the game as a virtual server. It's an option within the router. For this router, I did not need to enable portforwarding for that port, but it did require that port in the virtual server list.

    In fact, using Windows FW & Virus protection as well as many other things all still work.....as long as I run this app as if it is a virtual server.

    Hope this helps others.
后退
顶部 底部