搜索结果: *

30 hours is enough for a game like Assassin's Creed, not a massive Paradox game. Plus most of the campaigns I started I'll go like a year or two into and then be done. The farthest I got into Victoria was like 10 years with the USA. But I guess I could have used a better description, more like barely delved into?

So is this better than EU3 or extremely similar with updated graphics? Is it worth the $30 it is right now or should I wait till it's a lot cheaper?

I haven't been interested in a paradox game in awhile, Victoria and CK2 just never got me excited to play like the other games. I've logged about 30 hours into both and would rather not spend another $30 on a game I barely touch.

The United Socialist States of United State of Indiana has officially joined and has no idea what it is doing.

I don't know about that, maybe on easy but like normal or anything those knights would just be outmanned and destroyed.

If Swadia didn't have such a ****ty position they would be good, but as long as they border every faction they will always be the worst in my mind.

I'm going to explain myself about what I said last night, since I have only lived under one roof and have not experienced the relevant topics in the U.S such as unemployment or living paycheck to paycheck I don't believe I should formulate an opinion because I have no firsthand experience with the topic. Does this mean I can't be interested in politics? No, it should just mean that my comments should be taken with a grain of salt because I have little real world experience.

It is considering that 18 is still a bit low for most people who vote without knowing the main topics or what half of it means.

I have not played this game in forever so I decided to hop back on it and continue my Roman Empire in the mod that let's you make the Roman Empire (I forgot everything in this game) when I first started it up I recalled that I was much more advanced than the west so I could not westernize, in the short span of about 100 years I fell drastically behind in tech and lost much of the territory I had. Guess it's time to figure out how to play this game again.

I mostly said it because I'm still too young and ignorant to talk about politics considering I can't vote, so while I have my thoughts whenever I express them I make them as stupid as possible.

I can't pick the worse President but the worse Vice president is by far Joe Biden because he thinks video games causes violence.

Me too, I loved how gritty it looked, but I just don't want them to focus too much on aesthetics and not on gameplay. I most likely tuned out what he was saying but when I was listening it was a lot about that new unit camera or how they haven't added all the animations. That stuff is important but whenever a game talks mostly about graphics it scares me because maybe they don't have anything new gameplay wise. I probably sound like a blabbering idiot but I'm going to be severely pissed off if they screw this up.

Am I the only one concerned that this could be a total flop? The more and more I hear I get more scared, especially after the battle they showed, I just cringed at some of the things the guy commenting said. I don't know why but I'm slowly psyching myself out of buying this game. I think the way they present the Romans will ultimately decide my decision.

Ringwraith #5 说:

chargers1783 说:

He is supports the revolution yet gets pissed off when they revolutionaries ask him to do something.

点击展开...

So he's basically a lazy layabout that supports the revolution the same way most people support helping starving children in Africa, i.e. they like the general idea as long as they don't have to lift a finger personally?

点击展开...

That's actually a really good example because someone tell hims to abandon their cause then he goes ranting off how they deserve freedom, just like telling someone that you can't help Africans if you don't do anything.

Comrade Temuzu 说:

I was about to say, from what I understand, Connor is, at the end of the day, a part of the revolution, so killing Brits is not really surprising.

点击展开...

He is supports the revolution yet gets pissed off when they revolutionaries ask him to do something.

It seemed to glitch out a lot near the end, but that post was made directly after seeing the ending so I was mostly blowing off steam. I think the highest it should go rating wise is 6 though.

The game progressively gets more boring and even more glitchy. I envy those of you who are waiting for it to come out on PC hopefully by then all these bugs are phased out. I am very disappointed by this game.

I don't know if this has been mentioned but I think the AI should have a structure of what makes up their armies, because what always pissed me off during the start of any campaign the Greeks would always recruit those damn skirmishers and only a few militia hoplites resulting in the Brutii just steamrolling them. And whenever I played as a non-Roman faction and I finally got to fighting the Romans their armies looked like they wanted to drown out the sun by blotting the sky with arrows and rocks from catapults.

No wonder I find them useless the AI always builds horse archers and the cavalry that throws things at you, can't remember what they are called, so my elephants never catch up.

Hmm, like Triarii or hoplites? Whenever I use them they get 10 kills at best during a large battle. I probably just use them wrong, I just wait for my infantry to engage then do hammer & anvil strikes, it helps with breaking the enemy but I could just use heavy cav for that.

Hopefully elephants will actually be effective this game, I only use them as a scare tactic.