搜索结果: *

Just wanted to say, thanks very much for the patch. It sounds great! I didn't expect any more patches, but it's really great that you're still supporting Warband so long after release

Mattressi 说:

That didn't work, but someone suggested that I try turning on "Force Vertical Sync." and that fully cleared it up - no more sparkly flashes or jagged lines in the terrain. Just thought I'd let people know what the fix is in case anyone tries to search for this in the future.

点击展开...

Ok, I've turned Vertical Sync off - it lowers my framerate to 60 (which was expected), but it seems to cause my game to stutter/freeze every second or so; as if my computer is running too fast for Vert Sync to cap the framerate. Any idea how to fix this? If not, I can live with the sparkles.

That didn't work, but someone suggested that I try turning on "Force Vertical Sync." and that fully cleared it up - no more sparkly flashes or jagged lines in the terrain. Just thought I'd let people know what the fix is in case anyone tries to search for this in the future.

I've played many hours of it (double digits, though I'm not sure just how much...maybe 30 or 40?), but I've never 'finished' it. I tend to make new characters a lot - it's certainly not a reflection on your mod! I played over 300 hours of Warband SP and never once even came close to finishing because I really like character building and starting out.

So, I wouldn't say I'm an expert, but I've played it quite a bit. I would have played it much more, but I've been really busy lately (though, by the sounds of it, much less busy than Gab - he's a machine  ). It's really the only thing I've felt like playing when I've had spare time.

Greyjeth 说:

It seemed quite like a rant because of the essay long response in conjunction with a few exclamation points, and since on the internet it's damn near impossible to tell what tone is being told unless /sarcasm is employed.

点击展开...

Oh, sorry, I reread and can see why you'd think it was more of a rage/rant post.

Greyjeth 说:

I believe the Katana is a good sword and is not the best out there. You do bring up plenty of valid points on the effectiveness of the blade, however I think the way it is curved, it's weight, and is fought with (i.e. the way of Bushido) makes it better than some of the other swords I have seen.

点击展开...

The bold bit I can agree with, to an extent. Certainly the Japanese fighting style was effective, though I'm not sure how effective it would be in a large scale formation battle against Euopeans (it seems more of a duelling and small scale skirmish, combat style). Many European swords were light weight and had curved blades (messers, hangers, falchions), though these fell out of favour as armor became more prominent and effective. From what I can remember, they were mostly used because they were cheap to make and they could double up as woods tools (that's what the curve is for, much like machetes - helps prevent the blade getting stuck in trees and things), being frequently used by woodsman rather than soldiers. I'd imagine that if curved blades were that much better in combat, soldiers would have used them more frequently, since they were readily available.

Greyjeth 说:

Now that is not to say the other swords are crap or anything but if a sword is very light then I already consider it good. Please note this is all my opinion and personal tastes.

点击展开...

Yeah, I know what you're saying. I understand that many prefer katanas, but all that I was debating was whether they'd been actually used by Europeans. My points about why the katana is inferior are coming from the point of view where some opponents have armor and where they also already have curved blades as well as straight blades. Just doesn't seem any reason to buy a katana for the purposes of using it in those circumstances. IRL in modern times, sure, why not? Back then, I'll believe it when I see any evidence of it.

Greyjeth 说:

Also even though it is not named as such, it is in WFaS and it's even in M&B vanilla (in secret chests to my knowledge).

点击展开...

Yes, this saddens me. Well, it doesn't bother me in fictional Warband, but I just don't see the need to put them in WFaS, since it seems that they weren't used. It'd be like (to use a firearms analogy, sorry to those who don't follow it) a Heckler and Koch fanboy putting G36s in a game about regular US Army soldiers in Afghanistan (please no politics here). It simply is not correct for either side to have them and is glaringly, hideously wrong. And yes, I'm aware that horrible games like CoD do this.

Greyjeth 说:

So which buttons did I press? Quite the rant you have there.

点击展开...

Eh? I was replying to what you said. Never called you names or anything like that. Just stating the logical reasons why katanas should not be in the game. Now, engage in debate and give counter points (i.e. why you think they SHOULD be in the game), instead of replying with what amounts to "umad bro".

And a katana touched me when I was a kid.


(actually, the likely source of the "rant" is that I've seen these threads and discussions everywhere, with people who seem to have very odd notions about the katana and believe it to somehow be a decent sword, or even...good! :S)

Greyjeth 说:

And with that statement your credibility just sunk a lot. If you could also explain how it would be "catering" that would be great. Last I checked trade between Europe and Japan did happen around that time period, so who's to say a Katana couldn't have been in that area of the world (at least at that time period).

点击展开...

Also of note is that trade between Europe and China was significant, yet there are no repeating crossbows in the game. You'd think that if the Europeans were going to buy anything, they'd first buy something with clear advantages over their current equipment (repeating crossbows had much higher rates of fire than muskets). I don't actually want these added, this is more of a "Japan had generally crap weapons which weren't innovative or useful, while other countries had good weapons which aren't included" statement.

Why would the developers add katanas to the game simply because they MIGHT have been traded to the Europeans? Honestly, any game which includes a katana when it's set in 17th century Europe is clearly pandering to weaboos. I've seen absolutely no historical accounts that mention Europeans buying katanas, let alone buying usable (non-wallhanger) katanas and actually using them in battle!

The cold hard truth is that the katana was a sub-par weapon. It was made of poor quality iron (hence why it needed to be folded so damned much just to get it to have semi-decent strength and hardness properties) and was useless against armor - it would chip due to the hardness of the edge if it hit armor with much force and it had no point to thrust with in the hopes of piercing armour. It is a severely over-rated peasant-killer. Its construction methods were traditional, rather than high-tech. Its design facilitated in cutting down unarmored opponents while on horseback (much like a saber) and the curve serves no real use aside from that (the curve helps stop the blade getting stuck behind or in the person the rider is swinging at). The various European swords were almost all forged with superior materials and techniques, were hence more durable, were just as capable of cutting up unarmored opponents and also generally had a point to try to pierce through armour. Deadliest Warrior shows people using a dull-edged longsword against a sharpened katana. The katana wins. Sharpening is not a difficult nor time consuming skill. Sharpen the bloody longsword and it will cut just as well as a katana, but will be less likely to chip. Deadliest Warrior is a horrible, horrible show with so many details (like the simple sharpening of a blade) completely ignored and not understood.

In short (er...long) that's my thoughts on why no European would likely bother to buy an expensive katana for the purpose of using it in battle - they have much better weapons of their own already. Sure, some might have bought some as wall hangers, but who's going to use an expensive, inferior wall hanger in battle?

Yay! This patch has fixed the game! Melee is no longer UP, pistols (especially long-barrelled) are no longer OP and always used instead of muskets and the new sounds, effects and animations are absolutely superb! Seriously, this patch has massively improved the game and made it so much more enjoyable and varied (since people actually use different weapons in MP now!).

Great work guys, thanks very much for this

blak_king 说:

It`s dont work.On version 2.5 it`s work me perfect but  now it`s crash.Nothing can`t help me.But whay it`s crash i cant understand. I ubgrade everything,i do everything y told me.But why it won`t run.But that`s only in battle

点击展开...

Have you tried lowering all of your graphics settings? Also put the game into DirectX 7 mode. Turn off all sounds. Run a virus scanner (or two - I prefer Malwarebytes and SUPERAntiSpyware, because they're effective and free). Then, restart your computer. If that doesn't work, I can't help you. I did all this before when I had the xact same issue and it fixed it. I was then able to raise all my graphics settings back up to maximum.

I'm sorry to here that, Gab   This is a great mod (I'd say my favourite, actually) and I really appreciate all the time and effort you guys have put into this.

I hope everything works out ok for you. It's weird that your government is getting so heavily into nuclear power after the issues Japan's been having    With any luck they'll see sense and go back to solar. Perhaps you should consider some type of programming or game development job? You're certainly well experienced and your work is top notch, so that could be a possibility.

Anyway, good luck with everything and thanks for making such a great mod

Perhaps those who are having issues should download 1257 and see if it works. It has similar graphical additions to 1755 (Polished Landscapes, some better textures and models), has pretty much the same performance as 1755 does for me and seems to use roughly the same amount of system resources (memory, processing power, etc). If people can get 1257 to work but can't get 1755 to work, I'd say that there's an issue issue with 1755. If not, clearly it isn't the mod's fault that it won't work.

Alan De Soison 说:

euumm..yes i think my processor not fast enough
intel core2duo 2.25GHz

点击展开...

I can't imagine that's the case - I've got a Core2Duo 2.66 GHz and I run the game on maximum settings with between 80 and 120 FPS. Surely 15% less power (well, 30% because it's two cores, I guess) isn't enough of a difference to make the game completely unplayable for you, even on the lowest settings.

imgran 说:

I'm sorry Gabs, but I'm waiting atm for a fix of the doppleganger bug.

点击展开...

They don't affect the game though, do they? I had some fun fighting mine, but apart from them being on the map it hasn't affected my gameplay AFAIK.

I can run it perfectly now, with every setting maxed. At first I couldn't run it, despite getting good FPS, due to runtime error crashes when entering cities or battles. I worked out that it was a memory issue. I ended up doing the two fixes in the 1257 crash fix thread, running a virus scan (picked up one trojan, but that was all) with Malewarebytes and SUPER AntiSpyware (both free) and restarting my computer. I then lowered my textures to a little less than 40% and it worked perfectly. I then increased the textures to 100% again and it still worked perfectly. I have no idea which of these fixed it, but I couldn't be bothered to load the game after every fix attempt (took very long), so I did them all at once.

I've got a GeForce 9800 GT, 4Gb of RAM, Core2Duo E7300 and run Windows XP and can now run it at 120 FPS on full settings (I think it's limited to that, so possibly higher).

GABRILDURO 说:

Matressi.....let s make a deal.....wait until sunday and search...then send a PM to Saboteur and say:
"May you pls tell me where the chest is???"
Sab.....keep your mouth tight, ok???
Gabby
HEYY, nobody said anything about how nice new inventory mule Crumbs made for me?????
And Pirate ship fights???
And Zendar Island??? (that only took me 3 days to make it right,...)

点击展开...

So there IS a treasure chest! I only did a quick search because I wasn't sure if it was real or if racaloo was just joking. Now I'm determined to find it

Also, I was talking before about how great the sea battles were (in the thread where I asked how to disembark a ship... ). Or are the pirate ship fights different? Man, I knew I shouldn't have left the pirate island so quick! I really wanted to get back to the mainland so I could get some more Rangers, but now I want to go back to the island and find this treasure!

imgran 说:

It's the Elixir Falacy in gameplay.  You never use it because you might need it later, ergo, you never use it.  You'll have that ring of keys on you at the end of the game.

I know I've seen Rings of Keys for sale in various shops from time to time.  It's not a big deal.

点击展开...

BUT WHAT IF I NEED THE ELIXIR LATER!?!


I ended up finding more of them in the shops, so I figured they can't be all that rare. It's just weird that they're called "ring of keys", are very expensive and are really just a tomahawk with bad stats    I sold them after scouring the settlement on the pirate island for treasure and finding none 

Auldman 说:

I believe this bug is in Native Warband. It's also very much in With Fire and Sword where troops get jammed at the top of ladders during sieges and outside doors and up against walls. My understanding from old-timers is Taleworlds has for years failed to fix this problem. I don't know what we could do about it.

However one thing that has worked for me is to order my troops to "follow me" and then they get unstuck and I can move them into the area I want them in. That trick however does not work in WFaS but it has worked in past versions of 1755.

点击展开...

Yeah, AI pathfinding has always been pretty bad in Warband, but I think this might be a different problem. I've tried making them follow me and I've tried making them stand still and then advance 10 paces at a time. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, though it never works for all of them (just a few troops will stop walking back and forth over the same spot). It's just weird that it happens on some maps, but not on most. It's especially weird that the Amelia Township one doesn't work (it's open plains mostly) but the complex hilly villages seem to work fine 

I ran into mine as well! He had 34 men, just like me and 3 too injured to fight, just like me. Naturally I delivered my demands to myself, causing great internal conflict which manifested itself in the form of a very realistic imagined battle between myself and I.

Fortunately, I'm a much better commander than myself, so I led my men into battle, while I stayed back and sent my men ahead of me. The difficulty was set so that the AI was as hard as possible and there was no advantage in health to my men, yet I only lost 3 men to myself (who obviously lost everyone).

Here's me after I'd caught up with myself - notice that I'm bloodied because I fought gallantly alongside my men, while I'm not bloody because I stayed behind like a coward:


Here's me scratching my head for me - I'm very considerate:


Oops...shoulda lowered the hammer first...




(I think Gab put the dobblegangers in to make us reflect on our own psychological turmoil, which I've tried to embrace in this post. or it could just be a bug...)