搜索结果: *

click73s 说:

Why can't i change my ver in the epic launcher ? so steam you can change ver's but epic you can't.

点击展开...

That's a complaint you gotta take to Epic, they do it on Steam because steam as a platform makes it possible.

forum best place

Gonna use my spear and shield on bannerlord, better than sword

For now just use RBM, it makes sieges work pretty decently, they actually removed siege towers altogether, because they don't work, but the ladders work well enough, a ram + ladders attack always work pretty good for me, the AI will wait till the gate is breached before they storm the walls.

I even get to defend sieges from time to time.

You can use just the AI module from RBM if you don't want the changes to troops, armor and stuff

I haven't tried 1.6.1 yet, but to me it's truly mindboggling that they didn't think about letting you pick who gets to go.... I mean seriously?

For how long was that a major problem with hideouts before they finally implemented that feature? and it's basically the same thing, you're going in to face a number of enemies with a limited number of allies.

Come on TW...

niekdegrijze 说:

I would again advocate for taking control of your governor in a defensive battle, this would highly increase the importance of governors and your bond with the characters, this will increase the amount of defensive sieges the player will be able to play without wasting time by sitting idle in a castle or a town.

点击展开...

That's a great idea.

Huh, I had no idea that FSR was like that, I always thought it was just the AMD equivalent to DLSS.

Good to know.

The item donation for XP nerf is too extreme... as it was already pointed out, given how bad workshops are and how useless fief income is(barely covers for garrison costs), you end up depending on loot sales for money, so the balance was kinda already there, you had to choose between selling stuff or upgrading troops.

Maybe the XP gain was too great yeah, but going to the other extreme is not the answer I don't think... from super OP useful to almost completely useless...

Buskwacker 说:

Was looking forward to some Bannerlord this weekend, but my saves don't work with 1.6.0 and 1.5.10 beta has been removed. Why you gotta do me like this TW?

点击展开...

I also thought it was weird they did that, they could have just as easily left the branch as an option there, no need to push it to stable.

Well, I guess since the word "Confirmed" in included in parentheses, none of us can really question this.

Only if it's something worthwhile, and if all the problems with the main game are completely dealt with at that point.

Bloc 说:

It is within the possibilities yes.

点击展开...

If I may make a suggestion, or rather, more of a request heh

Why not make so the mod works perfectly with one of the fixed branches of the game? say 1.5.9, that way people that want to keep playing this mod can just pick that particular branch and not worry about any future patches without you having to constantly fix it.

perhaps wait till they bring 1.5.10 up to stable(and keep it compatible with 1.5.9).

Either way, I understand your frustration, they're really dropping the ball here in a huge way, modding is what made warband as big as it is, instead of doubling down on that they seem to be trying to nerf it...

Haven't played Bannerlord in like 9 months now, figured I'd install it again just so I can try this out before that possibility doesn't exist anymore.

Just to clear something up, if I pick the 1.5.9 branch at the betas tab on steam this will not work? only with the stable branch? (i.e. not picking anything at the betas tab)

so basically next week when they release yet another worthless "hotfix" for 1.5.9 the mod will probably stop working?

Holy ****, this sounds fantastic, a massive upgrade when compared to the original freelancer, so many well thought out features, I love the progression stuff you added, very well done.

I might reinstall BL just for this heh, haven't played in like 8 months, been waiting for a more substantial patch.

Yep, it is

I wonder if it's always the same

Hi

*plays a game for 100+ hours*

It'S BoRiNg AnD rEpEtItIVe

Cri11e 说:

Who is worse the guy flaming developers or the guy flaming the guy flaming the developers? lmao

点击展开...

The guy flaming the guy flaming the guy flaming the developers

Yeah, it really is isn't it?

I remember when I first got Warband on a whim, thinking "eh, maybe this thing will keep me entertained for the weekend at least", and 100 hours of game time later I still couldn't stop playing it, every possible little free time I had was playing that game for weeks, and then I found the mods...

I got Bannerlord the day it launched, played for around 150 hours through the first couple months, which to me make me feel I more than got my money's worth (anyone that pays 50 bucks for a game, plays hundreds of hours of it, then complains it lacks content is an idiot), Now I just put it on hold for some months while I slowly chip away at my immense backlog.

But I'm sure that, like warband, I'll be playing this game for years.

dukester 说:

Contradiction much?

Not everyone can afford (or is interested in) playing a new game every 3 days. This is the type of game that is expected to be played many times over many hours (as you are the witness to that).
Why is it unreasonable to expect for the sequel to contain more than the original game? Isn't it natural (or at least desired) for things to move 'forward'?
On the other hand, we have no right to expect anything from volunteer modders as if it's a given. Mods are nothing but a nice, free BONUS and shouldn't enter into a conversation about the state of the game except as a suggestion to developers of what players would be interested in seeing in the base game if it's aligned with the dev's vision of the product.

点击展开...

uh, no, there's no contradiction at all, at least not when you actually consider EVERYTHING I wrote, without taking it out of context like you did, well, at least that would be clear for someone with enough intellect to reflect over the words, maybe that's not the case here...

NordicWill 说:

Im sorry but i disagree. Playing thru this empty kingdom management and lack of diplomacy is hardly anyones worth. Yes it was fun at first but after a few weeks this game is dry for a sandbox. Sandbox game should have tons of replay value so measuring this game's value as worthy due to someone playing it for a few weeks or 1-3 play thru times is pretty weak point.

点击展开...

This sort of thing is always amusing to me, so having a game that cost less than 60 bucks, and playing said game for "a few weeks" and several playthroughs somehow doesn't equal value? how exactly is that a "weak point"? when there are plenty of games that cost 60+ dollars(with all the stupid season passes and whatnot) that will provide only a fraction of that playtime.

I don't get it, what is it people expect? a game they can play for all eternity? you should go play one of those ridiculous "game as service" things then, they're always finding new ways to nickel and dime you, and you can just keep playing the one game forever!

The original M&B went through a similar process, and there's no doubt in my mind Bannerlord will get there eventually, and there'll be some absurdly crazy full conversion mods for this thing that'll make the entire thing fresh.

For me the experience has been a lot like the one I had when I first played warband, played for some 200-250 hours, got a bit burned out, came back after a couple months, put some 100 hours more in, burned out again, then I found mods and that game is clocking at around 1.5k hours now...

To me this is just a child that got spoiled by the fast rate of patches in the first few weeks, and they should try and exercise some patience, will come in handy at many junctures throughout their lives...