Search results for query: *

Random map generation

Or maybe sandbox should allow us to choose our family
so an option like choosing how many brothers and sisters we have and their ages would be cool

Burnaa said:

Ok don't get that. But it takes forever to get a skill at 300
I finished the main quest and posses like 80% of the map and have no skill at 300. The most skills do not progress cause of lacking focus and attribute points... Real unbalanced in my opinion :/

Like you write in your thread you can make millions over millions just selling fiefs, it would be much better/balanced to trade them against other fiefs... ?

Click to expand...

well you could always just cheat if you don't wanna grind for trade... there is also a mod which allows you to rebalance XP gain from mod options. those will fix your issue for now.

It's already implemented, you just need trade level 300 for that

The way I can see reinforcements working properly is with a time limit according to distance from party
so let's say you start the siege battle when the enemy reinforcements are at a distance of 4 kilometers, then the reinforcements start spawning 4 minutes after the battle has started

the numbers probably need leveling but you get the point.

Actually makes sense. I always try my best to make my army from units only in my culture for immersion but now that you mention it it's clear that it's something that needs to be changed.

I personally would not help any other country in a war against my country, I don't think anyone would "except a few"
so most of your soldiers (from enemy culture) should desert the second you go to war with that culture.

I think the coding is fairly simple, something along the lines of:
If players culture is NOT the same as enemies culture, and enemy culture is "Imperial", then %95 of Imperial troops leave party and garrisons.
and the AI should also try it's best to recruit from their own culture so that they don't run into these issues.

brilliant idea.

This would give the player a different experience from the AI making the game less fair, so I'm against it.
Does AI even have the ability to trade settlements? if not they should.

snuggans said:

no need to be rude just because i play the game differently from you, at no point did i say it was a universal rule everyone should follow.

Click to expand...

I was rude because in my first reply I showed you the issue with your suggestion, and I asked you questions to help you make a better suggestion. but instead, after you make a lazy suggestion which doesn't work (too much clicking for upgrading units), you reply with "I feel that doesn't matter for the way I'm playing, so ill just make a statement as if everyone cares about the same things as I do"
as if what I just said doesn't matter because you're more important.

snuggans said:

the game just doesnt throw as many horses at the player like it does weapons & armor, so the 'sell all' becomes quite underused with horses. i only really need to start selling horses when Herd penalty pops up since having them in inventory provides bonuses, and then i go through them with a fine-toothed comb rather than via 'sell all', even if i opted for 'sell all' i would still have to sell some of the 'locked' horses that accumulate, which just makes me skip 'sell-all' completely

Click to expand...

yeah but you forget your own suggestion. you're saying locked horses should not be used for upgrading
so for late game players, who constantly get thousands of items from battle loot, we would have to first lock every horse type, then sell the crap, then unlock all the horses again so I can use them for upgrades. Players should not go through that for the sake of horse breeder roleplays

snuggans said:

that aside, i feel like i never have to hit the "sell all" button when it comes to horses, so the lock feature is more about preserving a few special horses for quests/breeding rather than because im afraid i'll accidentally sell them

Click to expand...

Oh you feel like that? You feel wrong.
Only because you play a certain way doesn't mean everyone else does as well. Stop making statements as if it's proven by science when in reality you only "feel" that it's true for yourself.

I lock horses because I don't want to accidently trade them, but I want to use them for upgrades
how would you suggest we can have both features?
two different lock buttons?

Earth Dragon said:

if you are complaining it takes too long for the opposing force to expend all their ammo

Click to expand...

I don't complain Any suggestion I've made or will make is because I want to contribute to improving the game. don't take it hard.
And no I'm not suggesting archers run out faster, I just suggested they run out eventually.

as I said in my previous reply, I must have been wrong, so let it go.

My archers weren't shooting, I told them to stop because it was too far. ( planned to get closer to shoot once the enemy runs out )
I think they take about 7 seconds to shoot an arrow, 7 seconds times 30 arrows would be 210 seconds... so 4 minutes no?
Anyways I guess I must've been wrong, still decided to report incase it's a bug.

Earth Dragon said:

I don’t think this makes sense.

You are someone who comes from nothing going out and making a name for yourself as the base gameplay. The vast majority of the world is in your same position. Just being 60 doesn’t give you a kingdom. You have to earn that through hard fought battles, your network of contacts, and (hopefully by the end, and if not mods) Diplomacy.

You could just as easily inherit a castle as an 18 year old after your father died in battle. What you are asking for is something completely separated from age. The Age choice is just a matter of how long you have to put together a kingdom, and as a woman in particular, how much your biological clock is pounding, in exchange for a boost in skill points

Click to expand...

What's your suggestion?

Earth Dragon said:

The Carthagians didn’t use War Elephants, Skirmish Cav and Slingers because that was their personal preference, they used them because they had access to elite versions in the area.

The want for “player designed troops” is far more of a fantasy element then what it’s advocates understand. This is best left to a mod, just like any other hard departures from historical standards.

Click to expand...

I'm gonna assume you replied to the wrong thread by mistake.