Search results

What's the point of using a crossbow if it requires as much investment as a bow? In Warband I could choose a crossbow over a bow since it did not require skill investment. What's the point now?

Don't do it friend, they added autoblock recently. You can play now!

Voice acting is an unnecessary money sink. It actually takes life from the world since you will inevitably end up with a single actor doing multiple people. You get results like Bethesda games where some old man is the priest, the king, the bandit and the dog.

But I differentiate kingdoms through color not banner design. 🤔

I see so that's why it is losing features instead.

That's like the opposite of what a sequel is supposed to do.

what the **** man

Nice

Clans are gross tho

I was using a lot of archers and a square formation. It helps if you have a hill, not so much for the high ground but because the horse archers will be forced to attack you from specific directions instead of having a full circle around you.

Wow, your situation was really difficult. Personally, I would suggest taking a moment to review your actions and think what to do in the future to avoid such unfortunate event.

Acquire proficiency through effort.

I'd like that even if just to have a mercenary family. Don't even need the dowry money, just give me a source for children without political commitment.

If anything the current units should reorganized. Thinks like the Palatine guard have no place on the basic troop tree and the Sturgian troop tree is terrible. Before adding some wacky tabaccy two handed wielding horse archer, I'd rather they fix the current things. Rather they keep it simple...

They haven't added a plague mechanic yet.

This sounds like some ERP ****

Just retreat.

Top: Chad Bottom: Virgin

CRPG stands for: Cringy Role Playing Gaymers And it sucks.

nooo not the racirinooo