Search results for query: *

  1. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    time to end my life
  2. AelleCyning

    SP Dark Ages [WB][BL?](S) 500 AD - The Dark Ages

    there are silk hosen
  3. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    cool
  4. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Where the **** did I insinuate that?

    For someone whingeing about a clear portrait of Cleopatra not being Cleopatra, you sure just assumed a ****ing lot.
  5. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    AelleCyning said:
    Amontadillo said:
    Why are you so keen on assuming people are following you around? You're not that interesting to most of the people here.
    Click to expand...

    I have screencaps of these guys ****posting my MODDB page. They made gifs of themselves doing it. Why are you so keen on denying blatant evidence?
    Click to expand...
  6. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Three people posted.

    I wonder who was involved in the idiotic argument about horses not being able to do damage to humans...

    The three arseholes mentioned. Who are all ****posters who post garbage
  7. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    There's no way you can possibly prove that is me and frankly I find these allegations outrageous. I'll expect to see you in court within the month or there will be a warrant for your arrest. There's still time to retract this slanderous libel if you but apologize and bend the knee.
    Click to expand...

    See, nothing this bint says is evne near intelligent or serious.

    I 100% guarantee you that none of those comments was left by Alma.  :lol: there's no need to be so paranoid
    Click to expand...

    Yes they were. Age of empires posted a gif of who did it
  8. AelleCyning

    Games you wish existed

    Death Note but in real life.
  9. AelleCyning

    SP Musket Era [WFaS] English Civil War

    Will you be able to shoot
  10. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    That was age of empires and gastricius, here is almalexia

    0558557f20.png
  11. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Again, it means we can say she likely may have looked like that. We cannot ever know for sure what she actually did look like, contrary to your claim. It is an impossiblity.
    Click to expand...

    Then don't say she didn't, with no proof at all. ****'s sake.

    And jesus, dude, nobody here cares enough about you to troll your moddb. And if they did, it literally wouldn't matter because who **** cares. It's an internet page. Delete the comments if they offend you so much and get the **** over it instead of lashing out like a child.
    Click to expand...

    Sure they don't.

    17a348b433.png
  12. AelleCyning

    SP Dark Ages [WB][BL?](S) 500 AD - The Dark Ages

    I've included the full set of Frankish clothing, which is composed of various designs, dyes and materials.
  13. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    And yes, trying to make me snap by "****posting" (SIC) is evidently very much above such pettiness.  :meh:
  14. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Amontadillo? said:
    You're being stupid on purpose instead of by accident now, I get that, but literally nobody claimed such a thing.

    Your own **** "proof" said "suggest" a posthumous portrait of Cleo. Yet you of all people are magically sure that this MUST be an accurate picture of her? Really dude?

    And then to throw out death threats over such a thing?

    You win nothing. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

    Threats on your moddb page? Literally who cares? It's completely irrelevant. And Alma is above such pettiness... Unlike you, evidently.
    Click to expand...

    Not they aren't, they attacked my ModDB page along with other users.

    Yet you of all people are magically sure that this MUST be an accurate picture of her? Really dude?
    Click to expand...

    It's the only evidence of her, so ipso facto, yes.

    There's only one source posthumously saying Augustus had flavum hair. No reason to doubt that either.
  15. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Amontadillo? said:
    minor criticism
    Click to expand...

    Ah, good old minor criticism. AKA death threats on my moddb page.

    Which is provably linked to this bint, but the mods won't do anything about it.

    Jokes on you, the Jews won WW2. There's a reason why we have an Israel but not a Nazi Germany running around. Checkmate.
    Click to expand...

    Don't study biology, everyone will just point and say you're an example of why eugenics should be instated.
  16. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Amontadillo? said:
    :Jesus dude. Grow up.

    You face some minor criticism of your rather too absolutist statement and suddenly throw around basically death threats, slurs, and generally act like a four year old having a temper tantrum? Really?

    For the record, it's literally irrelevant what these people's "actual" skin colour was. It's somewhat interesting culturally, but there's far more about them than their colour.

    Further, you're the one who is not being a historian. Again, just because there's a painting we think might be of Cleopatra doesn't mean that is actually her nor that she actually looked like that. Especially in the case of a posthumous painting such as that. (And yes, that is the one I was thinking of).

    Your claim that it must mean she looked like that shows your lack of understanding about the concept of source criticism, which is, you know, the key of studying history.

    But most of all your temper tantrum is quite disappointing - calm down, dude. Seriously, the only thing you've proved to anyone with this outburst is that you're really quite immature.
    Click to expand...

    Sure, source criticism. The kind of thing that says.

    "HOW CAN BE SURE CAESAR EXIST IF NO SEE HIM IN PIKTUR :eek:"
  17. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    People who aren't Zionists win.

    Oh, I win.
  18. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    You've succeeded in angering me by continuously '****posting' by your own admission. YOU are the one who started insulting me by mocking my posts, and you even said you enjoyed it and had done it in the past.

    I win morally since I'm not a troll who enjoys riling other people up and trying to get them banned. Says a lot you have nothing better to do.
  19. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Coward. I accept your admission of defeat.
  20. AelleCyning

    Does anyone else find Historians are narrow-minded bigots?

    Almalexia said:
    Any REAL ROMAN would USE THE SWORD *  RASCAL DOG  * to commit suicide following the FINEST TRADITIONS of Marc Antony and BRUTUS, YOU ABSOLUTE FOOL.

    P A T H E T I C
    Click to expand...

    Cato used a dagger. Using a sword was considered honourable but was not required. The noblest way to die to Romans was still poison.

    The only fool here is your mother for not Red Wedding-ing her **** womb.

    EDIT: Oh and b y the way Cato's coin showsq a nose, but we don't k no for sure he had a nos e so he probably diddtn.
    Silver_denarius_of_Cato_47_46_BCE.jpg
Back
Top Bottom