...Which is arguably better than nazi so I'll take it.
Only because I feel always feel queasy yelling: "Hey, that sounds just like Nazis, and, simultaneously, the very people Nazis had loud diatribes over!"
...Which is arguably better than nazi so I'll take it.
Jacob, that's just a disingenuous parallel. If I read some writings of any author with two braincells on the hypocrisy of American liberalism, including commies, libertarians and even other liberals, I'm sure I'd agree with some of their points and disagree with others.
Sure. Sounds like an adequate reaction to my post. Showing distaste with the current state of the media and disagreement with the ideology that's being pushed does sound pretty much like I want to put a burqua on every lady and desecrate some holy sites.
Also, there is no nuance in disagreement with left authoritarianism, alarmism and populism and disagreement with basic liberal ideas.
I can conclude, that if I criticize a certain agenda, I'm basically a religious extremist. Which is arguably better than nazi so I'll take it.
Looking at videos of ex-Trump voters restores my soul. ?I would argue that actual conservatives also hate Trump. I don't think there's any reasonable way to call him a "conservative".
Quasi orientalist reaction? What does it even mean?Yes, I agree, but as I said it's the not the opinion on its own, it's the weird quasi orientalist reaction to something that hardly anyone in the west (or anywhere outside of eastern europe and the middle east) cares about. Reading your initial post really reminded me of all the conversations I've had with islamists. If you think that means I'm calling you an islamist, then مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ ٱللَّٰهِ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا ٱللَّٰهُ
For | Against | |
Reps | 0 | 39 (100%) |
Dems | 59 (96%) | 0 |
For | Against | |
Reps | 0 | 39 |
Dems | 59 | 0 |
For | Against | |
Reps | 20 | 170 |
Dems | 228 | 0 |
For | Against | |
Reps | 8 | 38 |
Dems | 51 | 3 |
For | Against | |
Reps | 0 | 42 |
Dems | 54 | 0 |
Sanders lost despite raising more money than Biden. He lost due to the vote (and by a landslide), not due to disparities in campaign finance. Say it with me: praxis ? is ? voting ?With Bernie Sanders you had an attempt to counteract this with a grassroots movement, millions of dollars raised.
Point out the defect in the rationale. I didn't like manner, but that's me.Also, where lies the value to the conversation in anecdotally comparing me to islamists anyway?
Then it's funny how someone would try to point out a defect in someone's rationale by making an absoltely fallacious argument.Point out the defect in the rationale.
Probably just a fungus Get some hand sanitizer and rub it around.Wasn't meant as one. You're really growing on me.
?Wasn't meant as one. You're really growing on me.
?Probably just a fungus Get some hand sanitizer and rub it around.
Money in Elections and Voting
Campaign Finance Disclosure Requirements
For Against Reps 0 39 (100%) Dems 59 (96%) 0
DISCLOSE Act
For Against Reps 0 39 Dems 59 0
Backup Paper Ballots - Voting Record
For Against Reps 20 170 Dems 228 0
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
For Against Reps 8 38 Dems 51 3
Sets reasonable limits on the raising and spending of money by electoral candidates to influence elections
For Against Reps 0 42 Dems 54 0
They all failed because Republicans keep killing them.
Sanders lost despite raising more money than Biden. He lost due to the vote (and by a landslide), not due to disparities in campaign finance. Say it with me: praxis ? is ? voting ?
(half-joking)
Point out the defect in the rationale. I didn't like manner, but that's me.
This sentence means nothing. Breathing air does not mean I want to breathe air. I mean. Okay. That's technically true. Now what?Wanting to place a limit on the amount of money spent on politics if it's in their interests is not the same as not being beholden to moneyed interests.
Rhetorics are really ****ing important. Words have meaning. But you know what has more meaning than off-comment as to elucidating a president's beliefs? Their policy positions and body of work. Despite populists crying ''cRimE bILL!'' Biden has consistently voted progressively and has THE most progressive presidential platform in the history of the US.As Biden said at a fundraiser in 2019 to his donors, the party's actual constituents, "nothing would fundamentally change".
The US presidency has an enormous effect on Europe. Is the US going to intervene in Syria or elsewhere in the ME? Is it that going to trigger another refugee crisis? Is the crisis going to trigger populist and reactionary sentiments? Are the reactionaries going to form coalitions with conservatives and enact backwards legislation like banning abortion? Are we going to see a return of American war culture? How is that going to form the discourse in Europe, given that US cultural forces like the BLM movement shape our conversations? Is the US going to retract and go an isolationist path? Is the power vacuum going to be filled by Russia, who will be emboldened to intervene in European elections? Is intertwining our trade with China instead of the US going mean we're going to be more dependent on China? Is that a security risk?It's whatever though, I'm not from the US and neither are you
Yeah, the hysteria was that Sanders is a democratic socialist not representative of the democratic electorate base. Him winning the democratic election would've made no sense.It's besides my point that Sanders did not win the election. The response to a grassroots challenge and call for reform was hysterical, and it just goes to show that wealthy elites will refuse to take their medicine.
This sentence means nothing. Breathing air does not mean I want to breathe air. I mean. Okay. That's technically true. Now what?
Democrats are literally trying any venues they have available, both BIG like actually trying to amend the constitution to get the money out of politics, to taking incremental steps like simple disclosures in finances, but they get ****ed by the Republicans every time. You very willfully, and ignorantly choose to ignore the vast body of evidence to justify your conclusion. If you already have a result in mind, then any route we're going to take is going to end up in you trying to justify your prior without regard for our premises. It makes my blood boil how dishonest this **** is, but you do you. Your life.
Rhetorics are really ****ing important. Words have meaning. But you know what has more meaning than off-comment as to elucidating a president's beliefs? Their policy positions and body of work. Despite populists crying ''cRimE bILL!'' Biden has consistently voted progressively and has THE most progressive presidential platform in the history of the US.
Yeah, the hysteria was that Sanders is a democratic socialist not representative of the democratic electorate base. Him winning the democratic election would've made no sense.