Users who are viewing this thread

The atmosphere is decieving. Fur coat arround the shoulders and a bit of snow in the background can be confusing to many.
It actually looks similar to this,and was worn by the italo-normans (not in any way connected to rus)
WwEcX.jpg

I repeat, it should at least BE in the game, even if not used by any default troop.
 
Last edited:
The atmosphere is decieving. Fur coat arround the shoulders and a bit of snow in the background can be confusing to many.
It actually looks similar to this,and was worn by the italo-normans (not in any way connected to rus)
WwEcX.jpg

I repeat, it should at least BE in the game, even if not used by any default troop.
Perhaps in the game yes, but I stand by my personal point the Vlandians shouldn't have it, at least for the standard troop tree. Maybe for one of the specialist trees?
 
I repeat, it should at least BE in the game, even if not used by any default troop.
It is not as simple as one would think. We have many helmets for Vlandia, most than all other factions (30-35 helmets for Vlandia alone IIRC).
You said this, when I presented absence of pot helm without faceplate.
a43f8a9759fac5e581ae6116de75aee1.png

I am still against the early Norman look to being a honest. 12th-13th century appeals more people than early Norman design.
 
Last edited:
You said this, when I presented absence of pot helm without faceplate.
a43f8a9759fac5e581ae6116de75aee1.png

I am still against the early Norman look to being a honest. 12th-13th century appeals much more people than early Norman design.
It is true, most helmets than all other factions, but divide that number by 4 , the approximate number of variations per helmet, because there is, as an example, helmet with padded cap, helmet with padded cloth, helmet with leather cap, helmet with chain....and that "helmet" is always the same helmet, only difference is what is between the head and the metal, and its barely visible in many cases. So even when it seems there is a big number of helmets, is actually only a few, but with several different variations.
 
As @Piconi said, the helmet model I used has absolutely nothing Rus/Slavic/Scandinavian. It is actually an Italian and German late 12th century helmet, yet strongly associated with the Siculo-Normans, probably because it was used by Angus McBride to depict an Italo-Norman knight in Sicilian context. It has a strong "Western feudal" vibe imo, it wouldn't suit at all the Sturgians, historically nor aesthetically.

I am still against the early Norman look to being a honest. 12th-13th century appeals more people than early Norman design.
Late Norman actually (mid to late 12th century). As to your last statement, this is your point of vue. I'm sure a lot of people will be hyped by my earlier reskins when I post my thread.

Now, while I'm a big fan of late 12th-13th century style and of some Taleworlds designs, I can't understand how one can appreciate this particular Vlandian knight improved armor. It looks rough and inconsistent, absolutely not knightly. The helmet looks unpractical with this inconsistent narrow "hockey mask" faceplate which looks quite bad. The rough long rusty mail mittens looks like cooking gloves or some kind of industrial protections (they could suit some classes but certainly not a knight). The washed coat of plates reminds an apron. The mail "chausses" are rather mail socks put on some wide pants. They don't even have spurs. To be honest, the whole kit makes me think more of some metallurgist outfit rather than of a proper knightly armor.

Looks amazing, especially like how the mail mittens blend with the sleeves properly.
Thank you, the inconsistent hauberk was one of my main concerns. Though I don't think it's possible to make the hauberk blending like that with the coif and mittens in game as it's made of different meshes, I'd like the design to go in this direction.

Variation of the helmet, more in line with the game cover:
28marsgris.jpg
 
Late Norman actually (mid to late 12th century). As to your last statement, this is your point of vue. I'm sure a lot of people will be hyped by my earlier reskins when I post my thread.

Now, while I'm a big fan of late 12th-13th century style and of some Taleworlds designs, I can't understand how one can appreciate this particular Vlandian knight improved armor. It looks rough and inconsistent, absolutely not knightly. The helmet looks unpractical with this inconsistent narrow "hockey mask" faceplate which looks quite bad. The rough long rusty mail mittens looks like cooking gloves or some kind of industrial protections (they could suit some classes but certainly not a knight). The washed coat of plates reminds an apron. The mail "chausses" are rather mail socks put on some wide pants. They don't even have spurs. To be honest, the whole kit makes me think more of some metallurgist outfit rather than of a proper knightly armor.
I am not a fan of the current knight design nor your early norman helmet design as well. While there are some better alternatives like enclosed helmets(primitive great helms).
002_H32-03_LRG_so.png
dd65d5706acfcf90221be67cf8775959.png
Those helmets predecessor of great helm, used in the late 12th century among nobility.

While there are other variation without faceplate, commonly used among squires and sergeants are those pot helms(I presented in the post above)
 
Al Mansur redesign is great, but TW policy on Vlandia seems to be a 13th century western europe style... I would have prefer too this 11th century "norman style" with influence of italo-norman things and maybe those frankish morions. Bannerlord would have been badass with a more late Dark age style. I think Al Mansur has too much talent for the gaming industry right now.
 
Last edited:
I am not a fan of the current knight design nor your early norman helmet design as well. While there are some better alternatives like enclosed helmets(primitive great helms).
002_H32-03_LRG_so.png
dd65d5706acfcf90221be67cf8775959.png
Those helmets predecessor of great helm, used in the late 12th century among nobility.

While there are other variation without faceplate, commonly used among squires and sergeants are those pot helms(I presented in the post above)


This shouldn't to be misunderstood, Al Mansur has great talent in 3d modelling but they don't fit Vlandia universe. If taleworlds starts to convert castles into motte & baileys or shell keeps then it would be okay for me.

The current castle design and 11th century soldier aesthetic are not in the same time. The only stone castle that completed in 11th century is White Tower. All the others were motte & baileys or shell keeps, later on they transformed into classical norman stone castle.
After all I just want to my favourite faction be consistent.
 
Last edited:
Al Mansur's critique of the vlandian metallurgist knight is spot on. Vlandia should have an armour style reminiscent of the 11th century. As it stands right now the armour is too close to the ones available in warband, which is 200 years later than Bannerlord.
 
I am not a fan of the current knight design nor your early norman helmet design as well. While there are some better alternatives like enclosed helmets(primitive great helms).
002_H32-03_LRG_so.png
dd65d5706acfcf90221be67cf8775959.png
Those helmets predecessor of great helm, used in the late 12th century among nobility.

While there are other variation without faceplate, commonly used among squires and sergeants are those pot helms(I presented in the post above)

I believe these are helmets in the game currently for the Sergeants. Do you think Sergeants and Knights should share helmets, or should Sergeants get a different helmet and the enclosed helmet should be knight only?
 
@Falwick
Just to clarify things, please read the following points:
  • While some of my reskins like the Arbelist (soon to be changed) and the Vanguard (yet to be done) do indeed belong to the 11th century, both my Sergeant and my Knight reskins are based on the second half of the 12th century. My Knight reskin is a mix of German, Italian and Norman/French/English fashion from the 1170s-1180s, while my Sergeant improved armor can even pass the early 13th century. This means that my Vlandian reskin as a whole mixes different periods (not too far from each other), just as does Taleworlds design in a wider extent: 11th century Vanguard, 14th century Sharpshooter, 13th century Voulgier, etc. Once again, Mount & Blade is not a hardcore historically accurate game but takes place in a history-inspired fictional world so we can take some freedom in the design. I've nevertheless narrowed this chronological window, making the contrast between classes even less shocking (well apart that fancy Carolingian-inspired style that I'll limit to the Sharpshooter improved armor).
  • As I already explained in a previous post, the Vlandian castle of the recent siege is mostly based on Anglo-Norman and French castles from the 1170s-1190s (here Châteaudun and Gisors). Only the deep gatehouse (Edward I's style) and the late medieval bartizan adjoined to the keep are later elements. What's more, there are other Vlandian castles in the game which look way older, like these 11th-12th century Norman/French square keeps, which have appeared in Taleworlds' Vlandian artworks from an early date. Thus, my reskin is entirely consistent with the Vlandian fortifications. By the way, the White Tower is far from being the only 11th century castle built in stones: Montbazon, Loches, La Roche-Posay, Saint-Sauveur & co are other examples. Even in England, some stone keeps were built prior to the Norman conquest.
Now, although I don't like to talk about myself like that, I have to say that I've always been a medieval warfare enthusiast and that I've been studying medieval arms & armors and military architecture for years now, both as hobby and in an academical context (in which I managed to talk about M&B several times :cool:). I've even started to write papers which will be published. Just to say that I know what I'm talking about. I would never spend hours making these reskins if they weren't consistent.
Again, what's not consistent in the first place is Taleworlds design regarding their own statement:
"Vlandian arms and armour are based on that of Western Europe from the 9th to the early 12th centuries."

I am not a fan of the current knight design nor your early norman helmet design as well. While there are some better alternatives like enclosed helmets(primitive great helms).
002_H32-03_LRG_so.png
dd65d5706acfcf90221be67cf8775959.png
Those helmets predecessor of great helm, used in the late 12th century among nobility.

While there are other variation without faceplate, commonly used among squires and sergeants are those pot helms(I presented in the post above)

Again, the faceplate phrygian helmet I chose is not Norman/Siculo-Norman but Italo-German, nor does it belong to the early Norman era as it appears in sources from the second half of the 12th century.
About the enclosed helmet/transitional helm, I kept one for the Sergeant improved armor. Historically, it would indeed rather suit knights as they used the latest fashion armors, but I decided not to go against Taleworlds choice as it doesn't look bad. Dismounted knights (well, sergeants here) with flat-topped helms look badass to me.
However, your first helm example is one truly awful reproduction (I would not even take it for free), while the second one isn't an enclosed helmet/helm but rather a faceplate flat-topped helmet. As to the simpler "pot helmets", they rarely appear in sources, and when they do, it's almost always on nobles (mostly on seals). There is little to no historical basis for their association with squires and sergeants, which is actually mostly due to the historiography, iconography and audiovisual productions of these two last centuries.

Having said that, I understand your frustration, and as I also like the 13th century style, I'll make alternative reskins with surcoats, helms, etc. One important point: it's not 3D, but 2D work using only PhotoFiltre. So I encourage you to make reskins too. It takes some time, but it's way easier than 3D modelling.

@Ettenrocal @Mr Similan @GiipaGips
Thank you for your support. I wish I could make it quicker, I can't wait to share my ideas for the weapons with you.
 
I have always think kettle helmet is not good for archers, for the little i've done archery, i would not do this with a cap for practical reason. For crossbowmen it migh ok and maybe useful to protect of the sun.

Definitely good against the sun, but for that purpose perhaps the one suggested below could be even better :wink:

3EVDr.jpg


I think there are more than just "sun blocking" advantages of such helmet- given good defence from the threat from above i.e during sieges or even archery as the arrows rather flew from above on medieval battelfields. Developement of such helmets were long enought to see it also on WW1 and WW2 battelfields (broodie helmet) so defienitly it seems practical - but, how to say, "not from this fairytale" (it's a polisch expression, dont know if it translates well)

It's like You wrote later- it seems TW took this different approach for vlandia (infantry especially) to make them look like they went out of XIII/XIVth century- making them look "not from this fairytale" with the rest of the world.

Regarding the Vlandian cavalry, my opinion is a bit different from Al_Mansur, meaning "I'm buing" the current cavalry units design- as they (imo) fit somehow to the general time period and technology level of Bannerlord's Calradia.

I.e. Arbelists should be suited like peasant levy looks now (and not like he came straight out of War of Roses battelfied), Paesant levy could look "poorer" and closer to the first designs on the early stage of beta, Segants (Serjeants) perhaps in pot helmets as suggested above and perhaps spoleto helmet, scale armor for "improved armor" perk (actually was so fixed on this, that i thought AL_Mansur's redesign was for he sergeant when I saw it ; )

But as we said- it's all the matter of personal taste...
 
Last edited:
A few quick variations on the sergant wearing some variations of spoleto helmets and without (little) red (riding) hood :wink:

J4Dxt.jpg


9o4Xp.jpg


SZKs4.jpg


DO1lc.jpg


And the last one especially for Falvick here- perhaps the pot helmet wouldn’t be so bad for the infantry troops- as it doesn't hurt so much in comparison to the kettle one :wink: Enclosed helmets You suggested- very similiar to helmets used by the sergants right now in beta design aren't they?

You said this, when I presented absence of pot helm without faceplate.

I am still against the early Norman look to being a honest. 12th-13th century appeals more people than early Norman design.

But still think maybe nasal helmet for regular armor and spoleto for upgraded would be way to go with the sergants there.You say XII/XIIIcentury apears more people..again...matter of taste- but the thing is consistency and if TW chosen to set the time period of Bannerlord approx 200 years before Warband -shouldnt all factions aesthetics try to resemble that ?

McdU2.jpg


Again, the faceplate phrygian helmet I chose is not Norman/Siculo-Norman but Italo-German, nor does it belong to the early Norman era as it appears in sources from the second half of the 12th century.
About the enclosed helmet/transitional helm, I kept one for the Sergeant improved armor. Historically, it would indeed rather suit knights as they used the latest fashion armors, but I decided not to go against Taleworlds choice as it doesn't look bad. Dismounted knights (well, sergeants here) with flat-topped helms look badass to me.

Again- a matter of personal taste. Me on the other hand for some reason cannot stand the current sergant and crossbowmen design. It's not that much about historical accuracy but about creating a consistent feel of the universe that is somehow "beliveable" Again "feel" is always subjective :wink: I can eat up the current design of vanguard and knights- glad TW designers put some creativity in it, playng with helmets proportions a bit- so they don't look too plain like here

m8yMS.jpg

like the asymethrical mail chin guard, however hope in fullgame there wile be few more variations, like here:

7aump.jpg

Aand, just think- that spoleto - although being actually a bit later design - looks fresch and "moody" enough. Again, subjective, but tastes shouldnt be discussed :wink:

Iec_9.jpg


Perhaps in the game yes, but I stand by my personal point the Vlandians shouldn't have it, at least for the standard troop tree. Maybe for one of the specialist trees?

That is good option- specialist troop trees or minor factions in SP (i.e Golden Boar Company) should have an armor design that distincts them from the other units, "G.B company helmets, chainail, shield" etc.)

Guess from tomorrow we'll all get a chance to see full armory that the game has to offer at this stage, hope it will be at least as vast as vailla M&B Warband :wink:
 
Last edited:
@BlamBlam
Regarding the Vlandian cavalry, my opinion is a bit different from Al_Mansur, meaning "I'm buing" the current cavalry units design- as they (imo) fit somehow to the general time period and technology level of Bannerlord's Calradia.
If we strictly respect the chronological boundaries TW chose for Bannerlord, i.e. Dark Ages up to the early 12th century, the Vanguard designs are mostly OK (apart some details like the padded cap, side aventail, boots and mail chausses). And I have to say that the helmet is excellent, obviously based on a few archeological and pictorial sources I know.
However when it comes to the Knight, only the shield (without the iron reinforcements of the edges and that silly band in the middle) and the basic armor's helmet suit the timeframe. If we extend it up to the late 12th century as I did, then the Knight is OK, except the coat of plates. The problem is that it does not look very beautiful (the faceplate helmet, messy hauberk, etc.), has inconsistencies (why would a knight wears a rough padded coif when even voulgier has mail coifs?) and lacks details (spurs for example).

I.e. Arbelists should be suited like peasant levy looks now (and not like he came straight out of War of Roses battelfied), Paesant levy could look "poorer" and closer to the first designs on the early stage of beta
I agree for the Arbelist, I'll just give them a helmet. This reenactor gear would be perfect for this class (maybe with an even simple conical helmet).
I don't remember the first design of the peasant levy, I'll check it, but I agree that it could look poorer.

Segants (Serjeants) perhaps in pot helmets as suggested above and perhaps spoleto helmet, scale armor for "improved armor" perk (actually was so fixed on this, that i thought AL_Mansur's redesign was for he sergeant when I saw it ;
I don't like this "pot helmet" idea. It was an uncommon helmet and was seemingly only worn by knights. As to my Knight redesign, it would be way too ostentatious for a sergeant.

A few quick variations on the sergant wearing some variations of spoleto helmets and without (little) red (riding) hood :wink:
J4Dxt.jpg


9o4Xp.jpg


SZKs4.jpg


DO1lc.jpg
Nice work. I like the mail torso reinforcement, looks very 11th century Norman. The versions of the "Spoleto helmet" you chose are more accurate to the sources, but I still prefer the one I used, looks somehow menacing as Yabloko noticed.

But as we said- it's all the matter of personal taste...
That's why I encourage everyone to make their own redesigns :wink:

You inspired me to make variations of my Sergeant improved armor, with faceplate helmets instead of my knightly high transitional helm:
variationimproved.jpg
The left helmet should probably be bigger. Also I regret that I removed the rust stains from the hauberk forearms, it would have actually suited the rough vibe of this class.
 
I agree for the Arbelist, I'll just give them a helmet. This reenactor gear would be perfect for this class (maybe with an even simple conical helmet).
I don't remember the first design of the peasant levy, I'll check it, but I agree that it could look poorer.

Exactly, few simplier ideas can be seen below:

_Guy3.png

Older design didn't have headgear at all. It looked "poorer" mostly because lack of color+ stains/worn out texture made it look like plain linen shirt, not striking red uniform (sorry for the quality, just YT screen)

b48Q_.png

Also hard do believe that the peasant forced into military in X or XI century could afford leather gloves or boots. Some kind of arm and leg wraps (or bare foots even) would convince me more. Not to mention so much dye to farb the shirts :wink: Perhaps some colored parch somewhere, or ribbon to mark them out on battlefield - but non dressing them up like a squire at lord's hall :wink: This kind of "cheap" units don't get much "publicity". Here's rare example of (again) mr. McBride interpretation from the Carolingian period

jv9ft.png
 
Back
Top Bottom