zwaps的最近内容

Thank you all for answering so far.
Why I asked this specific questions is not of your concern, however, I may inform you that I brought Russias arsenal of Nuclear Weapons under my control.
I shall shortly wipe Quebec and Austria off the map, which is vital to my plan.

just in before close

Why does everything look like it's from India?
That is indeed a strange M&B conversion.

You have the story elements down pretty much, now we need a little bit of something actually happening.

Probably what we all know.

I played pretty much since release and the first time going up against a war party... with your few units.
You are scared as ****, knights approach down in the valley.
**** KNIGHTS. I only have peasants and a sword. What now? START THROWING YOUR ROCKS GOD DAMN.
I have no arrows left.
They dismount. THEY ARE COMING.
**** **** ****.
Ok everyone hold pos.... HOLD IT.
God damn how many are there?
Ah **** it CHARGE

Also: Why do so many Japanese movies/games have German names like Elfen Lied (said in this thread) or Ehrgeiz or countless others?
Maybe somebody from Japan can elaborate?

I have seem some decent ideas in anime.
To be precise there are a lot of world with much potential. Like in this one music video trance style, where they had scenes from some anime movie (some years ago, forgot what it was. Vedome Project or someting. I'd really like to see that movie)

But most of the time the usual Anime "qualities" shine through: People looking at each others for 10000 hours, constantly flying in the air etc. and everything turns to ****.

All in all Anime sucks.

First: The map seems odd.
Are you sure the represented country is accurate to that time?
Looks like there are some mistakes

Second: To my knowledge the Muslimes had the heavy cavalry, while the Crusaders did not. The Muslimic culture was simply much more advanced than the European at this time.
You'd need to fix that.

Once again, I am well aware of Swedens advantages in fielding soldiers that did not fight for money.
However, as the history shows us in this very war, Russia was superior, Habsburg would have been GREATLY superior and I guess the Osmanic Empire would have kicked butt, too. I am not sure about Britain but throw them in for a good measure.

The "best" army does indeed include size of the army. Having the "best" army means I can conquer any country. Sweden was not able to do that and would not have been able to do that with countries listed above.

Sure, Poland positively big, but its army was weak.
Even Prussia, little as it was, had an superior army in terms of size.

Once again, discounting tactics and events, just by how the wars were fought at this time, in big armies and infantry division, it was important to outnumber the enemy.

Radier 说:

On November 20 1700, the Swedish force of 11,000 soldiers attacked the Russian army of more then 30,000 Russian soldiers in the battle of Narva. Despite the disadvantage of being outnumbered by the Russians, the Swedes won a splendid victory.

We where the best. Europe was scared of us. Ever heard the german proverb?

"Bet Kindschen, bet. Morgen kommt die Schwede."

点击展开...

This is by the way not German.
Again, I highly doubt that the Swedes had any influence whatsoever anywhere except in the Northern Countries. It is hard to judge an army by the outcome of a battle, moreover you can see that Russia was able to field far more soldiers - an this was Russia - mind you.
1700 I would be more interested in Dutch, Spanish, British, French armies. Oh yeah, don't forget the Middle East.
Germany, Denmark and Russia are by God not the top notch enemies at this time. With Germany not even beeing a country and all


For this argument to be used with any historic validity, it needs to be absolutely proven and obvious.
This is not the case and simply sounds biased. Such a little thing makes me doubt the whole source.


While having luck with getting support from the Dutch and Britain (and thus winning the sea battle) the Swedish forces victories were against minor forces at that time - Denmark, Poland, German countries... The only main villain they fought was Russia - and Sweden lost badly - riding into battle outnumbered and getting killed.
11.000 lost Swedes verseus 1500 lost Russians.
Nice ratio there.

Then later Prussia joins the fight as maybe the only significant German force in the area and Sweden gets whipped again.

I think this is pretty clearly not the best army...
They walked over some parts of Europe in rather astounding fashion, but when they reached Russia the dream was pretty much over. While having no mercenaries has its advantages, beeing outnumbered every time simply doesn't work.

If you look at a map of this time, just by the size and population of the countries you can see that compared to Habsburg (Austria), Russia, France etc. Sweden was not superiour if not inferiour.
And they way battles went this time the size of the army counts.

how about giving enemies insanely low archery skills?
It wouldn't be grand, but at least you could have a decent firefight.

Thats a dubious site. "Sweden had the best army in Europe". While this is not only doubtful, the use of "omg best army" in this context would lead me to distrust this page.
I hope you doublecheck your info.

But yeah, the more mods M&B has, the better it gets.

I didnt want to **** on your cake aw, sorry for that.
Anyway, the best thing you can do in any lotr mod is to keep it realistic.

The feel itself needs to be realistic.
The desperation when fighting Mordor is essential. I know you endorse the books and thus know what I am saying. The essence of Lotr can not be put into a mod or game, but to make players feel like they are fighting in this very true world IS possible.

It's not fair, thought.
Your decision.

I just don't get why the army structure for Rohan (or Mordor for that matter) is the EXACT same as gondor.

I mean, what about giving Rohan a TON of armies that are mounted only and maybe only 20 unit strong (depending on your level).

In the books the Orks fear going into Rohan, probably because there are horsepatrols everywhere.
Big armies, that's for Gondor. And Mordor?

Why does Mordor send tons of armies to Dol Amroth. It would be possible to script an slow advance of Mordor forces. Isengard on the other hand could send out those Ork patrols.

It would be, at least, nice to change the structure of the armies and it would only take a couple of minutes.
You can keep the hosts, but Middle Earth is not about absolute balance. Mordor IS stronger and HAS more units.

Why worry about the right armor if the basic structure isn't accurate?

captain_bloodloss 说:

um...yeah so we got attacked first, and thus retaliation is a form of defense, and since we were attacked by terrorists one would naturally attack retaliate against terrorists, hence bin ladden, saddam etc etc, i would call that defending, because if we sat back and do nothing it would just happen again

点击展开...

While I do not see any reason for the US to keep from kicking random small countries in the balls while they can, you sir, are an idiot.
Saddam is not a terrorist and everybody knows that.

But whatever, if you feel like going into Iraq or Iran and killing those ****heads, go ahead, I certainly won't complain.
Fundamental governments are a plaque and two of this kind fighting each other is acceptable.