Good lord. Three pages and still this? It's a beta test!:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_test
Don't whine that people aren't receptive to "constructive criticism" when you're stating that something isn't up to "commercial release" standards that you think should be perfect and you want satisfaction because you paid for it.
You paid a reduced amount to participate in what you knew was, in effect, a closed indie beta. If you didn't understand what that meant, or didn't read the fine print, then no one here is going to have any sympathy for you.
For the sake of the sanity of all those around you, I provide the following "constructive criticism":
The WRONG way:
"OMG! This is broken! Some OTHER game that had a huge budget didn't do it this way! I'm a professional beta tester even though I have no idea what that means, including the fact that it's an oxymoron! I can't believe I'm not getting immediate gratification of my every whim, because I paid real cashy money!"
The Right Way:
"Hey, I have a question/idea/suggestion about the following feature/bug/build/idea."
When you paid for the game there was a big disclaimer regarding the current state and the reason you were getting a discount. If you don't like the fact that it's a beta (have you gotten that from any of the previous three pages? Beta? Please?) then play the
stable version on the homepage, or wait until
v1.0 (the actual "commercial" version that you paid for, which you get for the reduced price for signing on early)!
Gah!
-Tiglath-