Tartantyco的最近内容

There will be a meeting today at 19:00 UTC on the Teamspeak server listed in the sub-reddit.

I've set up this sub-reddit on Reddit for organization. I will still be active here, as well. Feel free to come over and add to the discussion.

I know that, I'm not sure where you're drawing the comparison. But this is all beside the point.

I'm not sure in what way you mean. Basically, we'll be making a "board game" campaign that we play outside of any game, and then battles are resolved in Napoleonic Wars.

Well, it's just in the conceptual phase so there aren't any screenies. Now I'm gauging interest and trying to get people involved.

What really needs to be balanced are the pikes/infantry spears. They have their obviously long range, but funciton just as well in close combat and are faster than most other weapons(Infantry Spear especially. Can't remember the exact name). They deal damage when you're halfway past the pointy bit and deal it almost instantly. Not to mention the whole slash damage output on spears which is also in Warband.

The muskets may need a longer reload time, but aside from that I think they're just fine.

Maybe you should set up a teamwork oriented server? That is basically the only way you're going to acheive what you want. When a game gets a big enough player base the level of play starts to decrease, but there is still a very big niche player base that will be attracted to servers that moderate well and emphasize teamwork.

Manitas 说:

Tartantyco 说:

I made a thread about this subject a while ago(Here), implementing proper 'movement physics' to sound all retarded about it.

点击展开...

And you were right about it, but note how it was with turn limitation. Kids went yelling "clunky!", and devs had an excuse to revert back to more arcade settings. Now imagine all that stuff implemented .

I agree with the idea of a separate combat mode though, but not the way the OP described.

点击展开...

The masses don't know what's good for them, one should never listen to them.

I made a thread about this subject a while ago(Here), implementing proper 'movement physics' to sound all retarded about it. Not combat specific, but a better overall movement system. Inertia, acceleration, all that stuff, properly implemented in the game would just fix so much, not just the combat part but also properly give pro's and con's to light and heavy armor and so much more.

If I got gold for all the cavalry I dehorse a round I'd be all pimped out with gold chain.... mail. So yes, Damage = Gold!

test 说:

Sprint AND a slower backspeed results in absurd facehugging, where the best tactic is just to run straight past people and spam them so much that they don't even have a chance to chamber.

点击展开...

Yes, this is annoying me like crazy(Even though I make use of it as well. I feel dirty). The tactic I use and that is being used against me is just rushing into the opponent, evading the camera so the opponent can't see what attack is being chambered and then attack, there's little to do against that. And that is why attackspamming is another good tactic as people are forced to maintain some distance and because it's so efficient.

I think that a lot of the issues with combat would be resolved if proper movement was implemented. Acceleration, inertia, penalties on missed attacks, slower backpeddaling, and all that good stuff. The platform itself(Your unit) is spammy, changing that would fix a lot.

Get this error about 5-10 seconds after joining the EU3 server:

failed_is_valid_index(i) (i=84); hint_number = 43

Yoshiboy 说:

Feels good that two hander spamming noobs can't beat a good swordsman now.

点击展开...

wut? 2h weapons are still as WTFBBQ as always. Melee has descended into attackspam contests with 2h weapons and tango sessions, blocking is just not viable against it.

Didn't get an e-mail about .624...