sleepyjon0的最近内容

ntb_15 说:

Vlejundo 说:

  -It is difficult to recruit new lords. On a recent attempt, I wanted to convince a Lord from Kingdom of Lithuania, he was said to be a rival to King Mindaugas, as well as hateful towards him. However, even with a relation of 92 (after sending tons of ale), he was unwilling to talk with me (You have to talk to me some other time then). The Kingdom of Lithuania has been reduced to just 1 castle, where Baiju ...(dunno what) holds no fiefs at all. At this point, it is unclear to me, why he is not willing to talk to me.
 
Dunno why the [img /img]http://thing only works for the first picture.

点击展开...

Its because there other lords from that faction near to him, he will only talk if he is alone  , i had trouble recruiting lords at first too, now i have ~16 lords.

点击展开...

Kinsume 说:

They only change the armor and horse to that of what was preset for them. The armor will bear their banner so it will be some type of surcoat while the horse will be like the other Lord's horses. The weapons do not change. However I would like an option to see what type of troops that they would be recruiting. It's weird having arab troops fighting along side of my Europeans ones when we're fighting other arab troops.

点击展开...

othr 说:

Those must be more recent features of diplomacy.  The one I used is uhh well definitely behind.  There have been many changes and it just isn't easy to update it anymore.

点击展开...

Kinsume 说:

Patrols have been implemented to replace the bandits and such. Patrols can be attacked without any negative relations to the faction they serve I believe. In which makes sense seeing as if you were to kill a patrol in the field and there were no survivors, how would the king and his faction found out it was you and your men that killed them? In the same sense caravans would be the same way, when I kill a caravan halfway across the map from where it's faction is how do they know?

点击展开...

kuauik 说:

Nikolai Alexandre 说:

Why not?  I can't even tell which troops are mine when I fight another european powah.

点击展开...

i smell total war,there wasnt any uniform in middle ages,except for some special units

点击展开...

voln 说:

othr 说:

This looks like the recruiter party is duplicating itself somehow up to the point where the limit or active parties is reached.  I'll check it out, thanks.

点击展开...

Excellent, I do want to clarify that I still have the original 50 troops (30 from recruiter 1, 20 from recruiter 2), even though that error has appeared 20+ times, once every couple days.  I never sent out a recruiter again after the first two.  The error still occurs with the "money" sound, but no money is deducted and no extra recruits appear.

点击展开...

othr 说:

Definitely a bug somewhere in there, still looking for it.

点击展开...

Psymon1 说:

I know this is a bit off topic (sorry), but I'm not sure I agree. Archers become very weak infantry when the enemies are too close and so having either cavalry or infantry hit them before your real infantry will mean loss of a great many of them. While having archers in the rear means they can still offer their strongest support.

At first I was concerned that the archers would be hitting my own troops, but after testing which should be first I found overall I lose less men with infantry in front. In fact I found consistently less loss by doing that. Besides infantry=life of a grunt.

Likewise having cavalry set to follow me is the best way to maintain control of that group who would normally get slaughtered if they ran headlong into the enemy front ranks. At a certain point though I just hit 0 then F1 then F3 anyway - controls don't allow for much fine tuning.

点击展开...