Scion504的最近内容

This thread is now officially pointless.

IngeniusSoul 说:

I've never said there would not be a maximum limit.

Let's be honest, this is stupid you have to talk to civilians to ask them to send you troops.... I mean.... common civilians own the troops ? You need good relation to be able to buy them more troops ? Whatever the money u got ? So absurd.
No, it's a big problem. You should not be meant to go from town to town to recruit, this is a boring and not exciting task. This is not how it would work in real life. This is not the task of a lord. This should be automated. Troops should be automaticly recruited, I don't think any king have been from town to town the whole day to recruit 1 by 1 100% of its army... let's be objective a second.

点击展开...

This isn't the case at all. In feudal times, Kings absolutely would go from town to town to recruit their levies. As an example. King Harold, prior the battle at Stamford Bridge, recruited his army on the way to the battle. This was generally how most levies were recruited. "At this time King Harold was in Southern England, anticipating an invasion from France by William, Duke of Normandy, another contender for the English throne. Learning of the Norwegian invasion he headed north at great speed with his huscarls and as many thegns as he could gather, travelling day and night. "

Imperial recruitment for the byzantine empire was considerably different. The byzantines used the theme system which used a type of militia system of permanent soldiers that were trained.

"The term thema was ambiguous, referring both to a form of military tenure and to an administrative division. A theme was an arrangement of plots of land given for farming to the soldiers. The soldiers were still technically a military unit, under the command of a strategos, and they did not own the land they worked as it was still controlled by the state. Therefore, for its use the soldiers' pay was reduced. By accepting this proposition, the participants agreed that their descendants would also serve in the military and work in a theme, thus simultaneously reducing the need for unpopular conscription as well as cheaply maintaining the military. It also allowed for the settling of conquered lands, as there was always a substantial addition made to public lands during a conquest. "

FeEduard 说:

I'll do that from now on, but the problem is that Even if i win 200 battles and lose 1, those 200 lords are gonna get their army back up in 10 minutes. And I need hours to get a good army back

点击展开...

Let's see here. This is the disclaimer you read before you buy the game.

First:

Note: This Early Access game is not complete and may or may not change further. If you are not excited to play this game in its current state, then you should wait to see if the game progresses further in development.

Second:

Balancing: Various aspects of the game may be poorly balanced. Parts of the game may be too easy or too hard.

Third:

Singleplayer Features: Several planned single player features may be missing or incomplete. These include but are not limited to: full game controller support, some skill and perk effects, crafting, some aspects of sieges, and clan, army and kingdom management.

So. Instead of writing a completely useless rant that will have next to no impact on development, you could write something that is a reasoned suggestion on a problem with gameplay. I understand this is a lot to ask. You also know the game isn't finished, and things are actively being balanced and worked on. No one put a gun to your head and forced you to buy the game. Especially, a game that clearly states, in the broadest terms. "THIS IS NOT FINISHED."

Again. If you have constructive feedback that provides an opportunity for devs to understand problems with gameplay. I'm all for it. Profanity laced rants that sound like they were written by a five year old, however, are not neither required nor desired.