Punished Mert的最近内容

IngoB 说:

Well, as someone new to the M&B franchise, I appreciate that this may be the grown culture. But it is not something I'm used to from other games, and I honestly think that this has to change if you want to keep new incoming players. Not that mods should disappear, of course not! Mods are great to extend a game in scope and replayability. However, I don't see why the base game that I paid good money for should not be perfectly playable and enjoyable in vanilla?!

点击展开...

It is and can be, but once you mod once you never go back. Plus if you dive into the dev blogs and check out the game architecture you'll see that BL was created from the ground up to be incredibly friendly for modders. Taleworlds knows where the game's bread and butter is going to be. Warband wasn't successful because of the base game, the mods carried it over the past decade or so.

You need mods. Mount and Blade titles without mods are mac and cheese without the mac or the cheese.

Badcritter 说:

Depends how tight the formation is. In this test, shieldwalls weren't used for example so spear troops did fairly well.

That said I got my thinking backwards on Sturgian Vets vs Shock Troops. I was thinking it was the Vets who had spears and that may have contributed to them doing better, but it is the other way around.

点击展开...

There's almost a unanimous consensus among the forums and players that spears dont work in vanilla when its infantry vs infantry. The collision is way too tight and the thrust mechanics are broken. Spear infantry quickly switch to sidearms and then use the overhead attack to clip through the collision.

Badcritter 说:

Yes, they will block and strike more effectively with higher skill. Very important in a duel, less important on the battlefield.

On the battlefield it is more about suitability of gear. Spears tend to do better for example because their strikes are less likely to be disrupted by nearby units in formation.

点击展开...

Spears? Do better? All spear strikes get disrupted in formation in the current version of the game.

Skills improve the ai, not necessarily the performance of the specific action. So a unit with 130 in polearms, wielding a polearm will act smarter than a unit with 80. At least thats what TW claims.

Chaosreaper187 说:

Because modders can focus on small fixes without regards to the bigger picture and future content.
Have you ever tried loading up the game with 10 different mods that make different fixes. It very likely will cause issues if it loads at all, because those mods are not compatible with each other, overlap and contradict each other.

点击展开...

10 mods load better together than the base game does alone. Don't talk about something you've clearly never tried.

You also forget in the base game cavalry gets a 30% advantage at their tier for auto calc. So by khuzaits sheer horse numbers they're fighting with a 30% advantage ALL THE TIME.

JustinTime49 说:

Personally, I really do like the mod but what you say is true. Arrows or archers, in general, would be efficient in killing en mass when a rout ensued. I terms of combat, an example would be the battle of Agincourt where arrows would actually not be arched but fired with incredible kinetic energy directly at the heavily armored knights, so you can only imagine how it would play out in earlier periods with less armor and 'weaker' bows.

点击展开...

You do know the archers only won in agincourt because the tired french knights were basically drowning in the mud and the archers just stabbed them in the joints with daggers? The arrows mostly injured the horses and forced the french to walk fully enclosed in their suits at a faster pace so nobody accidentally took an arrow to the neck or something. Tiring them out during a hot summer day. Then they got bogged down fighting in the mud with the british men at arms and the lightly armored archers walked all over them.

xdj1nn 说:

No, that's just some weird gamer consensus along with some history channel "specialists" who can't understand how to add 1 with 1. Historically arrows were used to kill, what some of the most educated into ancient warfare say is that for the most part, archers would mingle with the infantry and shoot at mid-range... Long range would be ineffective, bows only started being used at "arch" group shots with longbows in later periods. Also, the armor to stop arrows depend on material of the armor, material and shape of the arrow tip and the force of the bow.

There's too much into it, and I'm lacking the patience to give a class about the subject, I've researched it long time ago out of curiosity, but you are falling into misconception there.

点击展开...

Yeah, shoot to harass from within the infantry line. Same as how 6th to 11th century warfare involved two battle lines throwing crap at one another prior to the clash of infantry. Theyre not dedicated skirmishers but they also don't expect to kill anyone with it. Law of combat says the more **** you sling down range the numbers will be on your side. Repeat after me, nobody realistically expected their arrows to kill heavily armored line infantry at any range, it was a harassment technique.

xdj1nn 说:

This is a fantasy century warfare, Khuzaits are king (like Khergit in Warband), unbalanced bows or not. This mod makes arrows fly at slow motion.

点击展开...

In warband, heavily armored infantry could withstand arrow fire. Bannerlord is absolute nonsense. Plus bannerlord is historical fiction, theyve based everything off real life history so there is an expectation of it being grounded in reality of how armor works and physics. They have a physics engine in game for a reason. And now say it with me for the last and only time: no arrow in the history of human powered archery could laser through a heavily armored dude.

Arrows were primarily used to harrass, force enemy soldiers to slow down and bunker up, and injure people. Arrow wont shoot a great helm but getting one stuck between a joint in your armor or a gap in the eyes will put you out of the fight before the fight starts.

xdj1nn 说:

Realistic Battle destroys ranged combat.. Basically very unbalanced. The other changes do please me (and "realistic battle" doesn't have much realism to it tbh, due to their ranged weap changes, an arrow to the central area of the chest of an unarmed peasant should be an insta-kill, for instance. Sure, it would be more of a bleedout kill irl, but this game has no bleeding)

点击展开...

Have you even used realistic battle mod? I have the game open right now with cheat mode, gave myself a noble shortbow and piercing arrows and proceeded to one shot looters. Ranged combat will clear out enemy chaff and unarmored horses just like intended. And if you want to put the hurt on heavy infantry you aim for the head or flank your ranged to get around them. Every part of the army needs to support one another. Balanced is not having one group of archers machine gunning everything down. This is 6th-11th century warfare, infantry is king.

Anyone who says that cav only armies dominate on the field of battle needs to sit down and study some history. Mongol armies were strategically, logistically and tactically well ahead of their time. But when it came down to the actual battle, mongols could not break western european heavy infantry/cavalry formations unless they had days worth of outflanking/harassing etc.

The khuzait racial trait and their cav only armies emulate the advantage of having 5-6 ponies per soldier. The autoresolve giving a flat 30% advantage to all cavalry does not do it justice and basically lets all tiers of khuzait have the advantage AI vs AI. The fact that armor is useless and range is incredibly strong in BL their horse archers just become murder machines. So yes, the khuzaits need to be toned done, the autoresolve system revamped, and armor made useful.

My game has been spawning more wanderers with massive chins, including the ladies. Like chins wider than forehead. Also a lot of the afros on most of the wanderers.

bigbalzzz 说:

i linked you historical documents
if you read books made by only one culture and dont bother with the rest
then dont complain about realism because the game has a variety of cultures
get educated and read outside of your box read before you speak
because nothing can be worse than an ill educated man

点击展开...

No you see the problem with linking me things in arabic is that I can't read them. Plus this has nothing to do with culture. Every "warrior" culture that values masculinity is going to write about how their warriors were the hottest thing since sliced bread. News flash, they usually werent anything special. The arab horsemen weren't anything special, they just had a really good string of commanders and a perfect power vacuum to inherit their lands.

I'm done talking with you, it's going to quickly devolve into some ethno-nationalistic nonsense about the noble arab horsemen and their ability to blindly charge into death.