@Princess Mikoto
Switching the points up so it follows a bit more clearly. Change things around if you disagree.
1) Genocides have to be acknowledged by necessity before they can be prevented. Therefore,
genocide denial is obstructive to the prevention of genocides.
2)
a. You shouldn't harm others.
b. You
can harm others, however, in self-defense
...
...on the condition #i that the defensive harm is the only avenue to defend yourself.
...on the condition #ii that the defensive harm is not applied in a discriminatory fashion.
(I would also add)
...on the conditions #iii that the defensive harm is proportionate. (EG putting a knife through someone just because they said your sweater is ugly would not be a proportionate defense.)
3) Moral understandings take precedence over legal understandings. Would you agree with that?