Recent content by Phaiak

Hi Brujoloco

Brujoloco said:

a non base code/source code way of altering the final .txt files to make the Byrding and Knorr have a bit more crew size than 7 and 9?

Click to expand...

There is no way to do this properly without the module system. Because the crew size of the ships is not only relevant for the campaign map but also for the positioning of the npcs on the ship models in the sea battles.

Lieber Testpionier,
vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Ich habe die Fehler soeben behoben, so dass die Berichtigung ab der Version 2.052 im Spiel sein sollte.
Beste Grüße

Edit:
Fehler vom Update 13.06.19 behoben

Update:
https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382741.msg9094418.html#msg9094418

Update:
https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382741.msg9094418.html#msg9094418

See here:
https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382741.msg9094418.html#msg9094418

The 2.049 update is now rolled back and Steam should revert your game to 2.048 again. You should now be able to play the game again without any issues. If you have saved a game in 2.049 it may be corrupted and should not be used anymore. We will create a new secure update asap.

ariel127711 said:

You've released an update but the BUG has not yet been fixed ?

Click to expand...

We haven't been aware of the bug until today 10:15 CET. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks for the feedback. We are really sorry about the bug. We will try to solve the problem as soon as possible. Please try to make a copy of your save games before overriding them in V 2.049. We will keep you updated.

Laut Publisher soll das Update nächste Woche auf GOG erscheinen.

Willkommen im Forum! Im Normalfall landet der Patch mit einigen Tagen Verzögerung auch bei GOG. Ich frage mal nach und gebe Rückmeldung.

kalarhan said:

VC uses both systems for sea. Free travel (go anywhere with sea water), just like in land; on-rails travel (uses the bridge terrain to create a path on the water, but that is actually land).

Click to expand...

That is pretty much it. Let me elaborate a bit further on the "on-rails travel" on rt_bridge: it is just a "bait" for the AI. As soon as they touch the bait (rt_bridge) they will be transformed into a party that can perform free travel on the sea. So the AI expects it to be a "on-rails travel" as long as they are on land, but as soon as they are on water, nobody will use the rails. The rails are a illusion.

The problem is that the party that takes the player captive does not adhere to the rails, but rather goes all over the place at it pleases them (it?) even on terrain that should be unpassable.

Click to expand...

passable terrains for a party with the pf_is_ship flag are: rt_water, rt_river and rt_bridge
The party that takes the player captive does not need rt_bridge at all. rt_bridge is only the bait to get the land AI parties in the water.

Is there a ghost sitting at the end of the table?

The Anglo Spaniard said:

I asked about this at pc gamer last year

Click to expand...

Ah... that was the last question with the annoying microphone, right?

Best luck Frank, thanks for all you help in Viking Conquest!