Papa Damiano的最近内容

  1. {} Australia & New Zealand Multiplayer Community Thread {}

    I Vote papa,

    He is always neutral and objective. He isn't associated with a clan to induce bias whenever conflict arises. He endorses fair warning of the rules rather than blind ban spamming like previous admins have been observed doing. In the end, his motives are for a greater oceanic warband community, which I like to see in my admin/leader/supreme overlord.
  2. B Other Combat Animation Enhancement - Fifth Release with Trailer 15/11/10

    can you add a back flip animation plz
  3. Oceanic Weekly Scrim Night -- Sunday 8:15pm

    Rawr have a clan match tonight at 8pm, so we won't be able to make it this night. Hope the numbers are still good!
  4. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    I think members should be careful when accusing Keen members of actions done by aliases. Trouble is that Keen have dug themselves a bit of a hole with the aliases. Really, the aliases can be anyone having a good day (skill wise). Play well, saying a few words characteristic of Keen (e.g., Gleetz, hailz, etc), and before you know it the server thinks they're Keen. Someone could take advantage of this ease of imitation so I would advise against automatically assuming an alias is Keen.
  5. The Conquest of Calradia

    Mar 说:
    yeh GG guys

    what I learnt from that battle was how much more effective bows were compared to crossbows in an organised battle (at least against cav)

    Nef - could do 2-3 passes through the team before being de-horsed or killed
    Me - 6 out of 8 times I got de-horsed. Often I couldn't even get close . (However at range your archer's weren't accurate)

    I wish I had the money to try heavy cav against you guys.

    Yeah I've always thought this. That's why I hate crossbows.

    Verry fun game! Was hoping there'd be a counter attack after :sad: Too bad noone took a screen shot to see my uber scoree
  6. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    I hope Kos do join the 7v7. I think not joining it just because it was run by keen is quite silly. It's a good system to facilitate matches between clans.

    Also

    RAOUL 说:
    rawr have undoubtedly subscribed to the same nonsense that you have, mr. knightmeister, hence why they haven't even bothered to sign up.  but maybe not, matt seems to actually have a brain of some denomination.

    I believe the reason why Rawr hasn't signed up is because matt only got the website from me last night. Hopefully the team will be up soon.
  7. Oceanic 1 vs 1 Dueling ladder

    Joined, hope I did it right :\ Assuming as it's 1v1 each individual makes a team, correct?
  8. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    Very good game. Good night match wise tonight. And epic last shot by me *boasts* :razz:
  9. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    Haha yes :razz: it was a fun match!
  10. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    Used 说:
    i'm not an alias, or one of those fake clans like LBR or Meow or TGD, i'm john and Jims_Warband_clan is legit

    And TGD is a legit clan with quite a few members now. I'd hardly call it fake.
  11. Oceanic 7 vs 7 ladder: the thread

    RAOUL 说:
    I have also edited Field by the River slightly, so, it looks like that will be the third map for the tournament.
    What have you changed on the map?
  12. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    I think we should drop the topic now. Resentment is strongly present in a lot of people's text, people are trying to be civil but as this progresses similar themes keep arising that are only causing more grief (who's fault, who was going to win, etc).

    Personally I think we should still battle dojo, maybe not the same map because for now it's association with the "incident" is too fresh.
  13. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    Strongbow 说:
    1. again, you only think that because youre losing instead of killing, and cant accept that it is a legitimate tactic, be it used frequently or as a last-resort
    2. this isnt a real battle for one, also retreating is when you give up entirely
    3. it "drags the game out" to however long the round lasts, which is no problem, have fun trying to kill the person, use that for next round to make sure it doesnt happen again
    4. if they were the "legitimate winner" then they would have killed them all already
    5. it only increases the resentment between little kiddies who all shout out on their voips about how mad they are and then leave the match, when really all they were mad about was not being able to kill the person, they werent mad at the tactic, though they think they are, and its fun if you have patience, if you just like matches where infantry charge eachother then you wont like proper matches, where the dirtiest of tactics are utilised, yes, even forcing a draw

    Lol? Do you really believe this text? People are not just angry for "not being able to kill the person", people are angry for waiting and waiting, losing illegitimately, and because they feel they are not having as much fun as they should.  Raoul makes a strong point that on maps such as village if someone is trying to hard to hide from you then its highly improbable to find them in the allocated time. Think about it, can you really expect a battle to revolve around "trying to make sure you scout and watch every single hiding spot, INCLUDING outside the map" while you are trying to defend the village? Yeah that's fun... totally defeats the purpose of the game.
  14. <> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

    Strongbow 说:
    Rawr_Calis 说:
    Well it would be up to discretion, if theres 1 guy left and 10 guys are running at him, well he is going to lose. He should just accept it (unless he's me of course cause i can take on any number of people cause im awesome).

    If its say 3v1 well he still has a chance and he should do whatever he can to win it. Backing up and fighting in a doorway/ladder to restrict the number of ppl who can attk you is also a very valid tactic. What i hate seeing is some guy on a horse running off into the sunset.

    Backing away is not the same as running away. I back up when i fight but if ppl are chasing you they will catch up (as wlaking backwards is slower than running forward) and you'll have to fight. Running away is when your back is turned and your just heading for the hills, ppl cannot catch up to you.

    Even if there are arguements over it, there are heaps of arguments now when it happens so the situation can only get better.

    Apparently there is alot of hate flying around atm over what happend, to those dishing it out get over it, acting like a **** while playing an online game doesnt prove your better than anyone, all it does is drive ppl away from the game.

    To those on the recieving end, really.... its the internet, this is the **** that happens, people are going to troll you regardless. Just ignore them or if you enjoy a heated exchange get stuck into them. Its just text, sure its distracting but it doesnt mean anything, some guy sitting in front of his computer on a friday night thinks your a *****, who cares. I am civil when i play games because it takes less energy than being a troll, how the fk can anyone enjoy playing a game while they're typing 1/2 the time, how much gratification can you get from giving yourself a pat on the back for bagging someone? out honestly?

    lets analyse this and see whats actually happening. hes riding off into the sunset so he can get a draw and not lose a point for his clan, giving the clan another chance to score. ask yourself, why are you mad at this? the first thing that comes to mind is "because its slowing down the game". thats true, it does slow down the game, it makes you killing him take longer. hang on, isnt that whats making you mad? the fact that you wont be able to kill him? thats really all thats wrong; youre just mad because you cant kill him. know WHY youre mad before you start venting your anger at the other clan. none of you did. its a legitimate tactic. maybe focus your strategy on not letting them escape, mmmmmh?

    There are many reasons why in my opinion it should not be done, at the top of my head:

    1. Makes the game less fun
    2. In a real battle it would be considered a retreat and therefore a loss
    3. It drags the game out heaps
    4. It robs the (in my view) legitimate winner of the round of a win
    5. It increases resentment between the clans, provoking more spiteful tactics such as these, and thus ruining the game for everyone

    Also, pretty hard to make sure they "don't escape" if you're the defender.
后退
顶部 底部