Mehrunes的最近内容

I've had a few CTDs in battle too. The best you can for now is try to help armagan track them down by getting one right after saving that's repeatable and sending in the save file.

Skyrage 说:

"Am afraid not, old friend, I only have 7 HP left, I think it'd be best if you dismounted me and went on foot. Wouldn't want me killed, now would you?"

Ugh...horrible...

点击展开...

And yet, you not only know exactly how much health you have but can also see how close you are to dropping your shield to a fraction of a percent.

Fileshack has the Gothic II demo, it's free and there's usually not much of a wait.

Tweaking the numbers wouldn't help, increasing costs would only create less variety whatever the numbers are.

If you wanted to reward specialized characers you would do the opposite, reduce attribute costs for increasing skill like this...

Attrib. : Max Skill
--------------------
05 : 1
10 : 2
14 : 3
18 : 4
21 : 5
24 : 6
26 : 7
28 : 8

As you can see, the more points you put in an attribute the higher the payoff in skill max. A jack of all trades who spread his points evenly would probably not be able to get anything higher than 4. Getting two attributes to 28 would mean having the other 2 stuck at 9 or 10.

I don't like this idea and it will probably have the opposite effect then what's intended. Everyone will become a jack-of-all-trades to make the most out of the points they get rather than spend more and more points on a single attribute for a diminished effect (why bother raising only one attribute to 50 to have a couple skills at level 8 when you can raise everything to 20 and have every skill at level 5?).

screwtype 说:

I think a better solution would be just to cut down radically on the amount of battle booty. If you've got a party of 30 fighting a party of 30, then the booty should be spread amongst your party, so you should get only ONE shield and ONE weapon.

点击展开...

That's the way it works already. Though, as the leader, you get the largest share of the loot.

That tax_collector must be fearsome indeed.

Balderdash. Vader, being the villain, would feel compelled to capture Bond and stage an overly elaborate execution where he prattles endlessly about his plans only to leave before Bond was actually dead while just assuming the execution was a success, allowing Bond to escape and foil Vader's plans at the last possible moment, saving the day (cut to scene with Bond and Leia enjoying each other's company in a lifepod while British ships race to "rescue" them).

Laurence of Arabia 说:

arrgh i got this too! Lost 2-3 hours!

点击展开...

Play with no quitting without saving as God intended and the game will autosave after every battle and trade.

I don't think I'd want to do this even once.

I've got a DVD-R/W that can read and burn just about anything, but they cost about $50 more than straight DVD-ROMs.

Wanderer 说:

Tried that myself, stupid moron always runs past me into the arms of my waiting knights and Man-At-Arms who have pretty much toasted at least half of his remaining force. I can't seem to get that tactic to work well.

点击展开...

The AI will follow you forever if you're the only one in their combat range.

I carry around a blunt weapon for these missions. Remember that enemy groups enter combat in reverse order, so if the noble is at the top he'll be last one to join. I let my men deal with them while keeping an eye out for him as reinforcements arrive and then move in to knock him out alone.

Yeah, DVD-Roms can play both and only cost around $25.

Do you already have a DVD-Rom drive? If you don't you should probably get one instead of a CD-Rom now that games are starting to come out on them (I think Silent Hunter III was even exclusively DVD).