On ModDB it says it's a Warband mod, though, and that's where I installed it.
Trump has just been president, and his antics post-term has rallied the centre-left - everyone is on high alert because they know what is at stake. And let's not forget the Supreme Court shooting themselves in the foot by overthrowing Roe vs. Wade. I was part horrified, part elated when that news broke - this was a god-send with regards to the midterms. Traditionally, women vote more than men do, so it's a really bad idea to piss women off in an election year.
My argument is that being certain of a thing is no guarantee. There are no arguments against Trump's success now which are any better than the ones for the 2016 election. People were cock-sure he couldn't possibly win then, and they had excellent reasons for thinking so. The reasons today are only cosmetically different, if that. Murdoch refusing to support? Same as before. Stronger Republican rivals? Ditto 2016. And if he announces that he's pulling out of the race, then that's nothing new either. Trump has a knack for throwing a spanner in the gears, fudging up all expectations.
No one saw Trump winning when he announced his candidacy in 2015 either. It wasn't until 2016 that people on both sides of the isle actually started to entertain the notion that Trump just might win this thing. And many - especially among Trump's opponents - were flabbergasted when the election went to Trump. Don't say it couldn't happen in 2024, because that's just what they said about 2016.
So what? I'm talking 2016, before he was president. Exact same situation as now. Murdoch was not on the Trump train until the big push of 2016. In other words, so far it's just history repeating itself. If Murdoch still doesn't support Trump after May of 2024, then it will be different.
That doesn't really mean anything. Murdoch refused to back Trump the first time around, too, until they reached an amicable agreement in May of 2016. Up until that time, Murdoch had been openly critical of Trump. Whether or not he'll back him again depends on whether Trump will become as popular again, I suppose. It's early days yet, and will be too early to call until 2024.
Since you say that, I'm guessing what you have seen of the speech is via non-conservative sources, which make a big deal out of how boring the speech was. But did you check out what Hannity actually said about it? Here's the "cut off" - which was not actually a cut off, but a cut in:
The 2016 sabotage was all on Trump. Trump was successful in convincing people on both sides that Hillary was bent and evil, and Bernie-supporters who felt betrayed that they lost the primaries to her did not support Hillary like Bernie wanted them to do. For the most part, they either abstained, voted independent, and some even voted Trump.
His speeches were always like that. And Fox was jizzing all over it as usual; couldn't get enough of it. Just like old times. It is no more impossible for Trump this time around than it was the last time.
One can always point to how things were different. But there's one thing that's the same: everybody underestimated Trump. There were all sorts of perfectly valid reasons why Trump couldn't possibly win in 2016, too. I wouldn't count my chickens just yet.
Yes, 0.808 is there, but I want 0.800, the buggy version
0.808 is actually far superior, as 0.800 had a number of bugs and a couple different features (the map was different for just that version). So it's for my own personal research that I would like to check it out. I don't think there was even a single mod for this version, as it got fixed pretty quick as I recall.
Isn't that what happened the first time around too, though?