Recent content by Jancnahn

+1 for unlocking "none" in the most recent version as of 12/21/2022

Andrei[beast] said:

Damn, these are cool! Was kinda running out of names by now thanks for sharing!

Click to expand...

Glad you find it interesting! I was disappointed to find out in my third playthrough that my character's auto-generated name was shared by an npc town merchant Needed something unique

Reiksmarshal said:

Honestly I wish we could auto generate our clan name.

Click to expand...

It motivated this thread. I guess polishing the tutorial mission further is not on TW's top priority.

Less Talking More Raiding said:

SandBoxCore\ModuleData spcultures.xml

Click to expand...

Amazing! Thx!

Which file contains all the first names that you find in the character generation or those of npc artisans/merchants/gang leaders?
I could parse all lord names from `lords.xml` and several companion names from `companions.xml`, but I feel there should be a bigger pool of first names that's being used in randomly generated npcs.

NPC99 said:

Only the map_rock_big series have physics bodies as Taleworlds didn't expect you to expand their small rocks to a size where collisions were important. If you want a physics body for map_rock_c you would need to export the original map_rock_c out of Bannerlord with TpacTool, create a physics body for it (must be very low poly for optimisation) and reimport them both together (with the physics body named bo_map_rock_c) into your own mod. These should then override the native asset. You'll also need to reapply the native material (only to the rock not the physics body which will be invisible).

Click to expand...

Thanks for the answer!

NPC99 said:

Just remember, when you select an entity in your scene, you can go to the physics section of the entity inspector and tick the show physics box so you can see its collision mesh.

Click to expand...

I still couldn't figure out how to work this out. Could anyone help me out?

What I want:
I want a `map_rock_new_c` object entity in my village scene to have a physics body so that agents collide with it.

Current situation:
When I add a `map_rock_new_c` entity in a scene, it doesn't come with a physics body. There is no `bo_map_rock_new_c` file to add. When I try to add some similar shape through Resource Browser, it says 'Unable to save body: Package is protected. Protected items cannot be modified.' So I'm stuck.

Not using the `map_rock_new_c` prefab and choosing any other rock model with `bo_` is a possible solution, but I'm not totally happy with the approach because I've already spent some time decorating the terrain using the `map_rock_new_X` series.

Just wondering: Is it possible to create my own physics body and add to "protected items"?

NPC99 said:

Bodies are just invisible physics shapes = low poly collision meshes. They are loaded with their related visible mesh and need the same name with a bo_ prefix. Look at the section on overriding meshes in Taleworlds Documentation http://docs.modding.bannerlord.com/asset-management/asset-types/overriding_assets/
The lower poly the physics body the better as that makes ai-pathfinding computations easier.

Click to expand...

thank you so much! i was using map_rocks in a scene without knowing that it doesn't have an attached physics body so that characters could just walk through it. i hope i could learn how to get it fixed by looking at the document myself. thank you!

does anyone know how to how to create body assets? i see that 'rock' props are made out of mesh + physics body, and i only have the mesh to use. i couldn't figure out how to make and apply new body assets.

I played with it a little with small resolution and sort of get that we get +1s to the resolution size because the number should represent the number of vertices whereas the resolution size represents the number of cells.

Did I infer correctly???

Okay it looks like I could've replied to the existing Modding Q&A thread there. I would gladly do that if someone could tell me how to erase this thread ? I don't see a delete button.

Of course I would appreciate it if someone leaves an answer to the question here though.