Puget Systems Adobe Premiere Pro CC review of Ryzen versus 6+ core Intel processors said:Compared to the 6-8 core "High End" Intel CPUs, the two Ryzen CPUs we tested fared pretty well. They should be pretty much on par with the Core i7 6850K for exporting and rendering previews (for about $100-200 cheaper as well), but are on average around 30% slower for warp stabilize. If you use warp stabilize in your projects, that is likely going to be the tipping point where you should definitely use a i7 6850K over the Ryzen CPUs.
These conclusions show the allegations of controlled demolition to be absurd and leave no doubt that the towers failed due to
gravity-driven progressive collapse triggered by the effects of ﬁre.
...we see that the available energy is far higher than required
for all of the comminution [pulverization].
this is the only power which turn material into microscopic dust.
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=4418&view=findpost&p=55165 said:Sure, as soon as you provide evidence that the existence of ANY 30 micron particles indicates the expenditure of 1.4 million KWH of energy.
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=4418&view=findpost&p=55177 said:Anyone can now see that the 'light concrete' of the floors, and 'gypsum' of the office dividers/wall-cladding, were FIRST compression/friction heated/fractured by initial plane impact and jet fuel explosion, and THEN further heated by OFFICE furniture/equipment etc 'fuel' fire/explosions, and THEN WHILE STILL VERY HOT (full of energy) they were FURTHER suddenly compressed/ground by chaotic impact/vibration and 'ball mill'-like violent tumbling during the collapse of the HEAVY, gravitational-energy-laden TOP, HAT TRUSS AND REST OF THE BUILDING.
2. an empty aluminium tube slower than one mach cannot penetrate steel with its nose intact. the wings, the engines, actually most of the plane would crash and fall. the nose would be non existant. the incident seems like it is from a roadrunner episode.
3. this definitely cannot pulverize a steel building into dust. that is microscopic dust.
dalai pasha said:there should be 1.2 million tons of debris. where is it? where has 110 story building gone? how was the wreckage cleaned to quickly? where has all the ruble gone FFS?
just watch this, joo. this is one day later.
The men were spread out in the stairwell between the second and fourth floors. Four other rescue workers were trapped as well: two firefighters, a Port Authority police officer and a Fire Department chief, Rich Picciotta. They had cuts and bruises. They were caked with dust.
Sixteen people survived inside the collapse of the World Trade Center, and they were all in Stairwell B of the North Tower, in the center of the building. The survivors were spread out between floors 22 and 1.
For both the intact and plausible compromised core states considered, it is estimated that a core
collapse mechanism could have been initiated in WTC-I if the tower core column temperatures
were elevated to approximately 700oC. As the aircraft debris went through several stories in the
tower, much of the thermal insulation on the core columns would have been scoured off. Under
such conditions, the ensuing fire would be sufficient to cause instability and initiate collapse.
"Towers Don't Topple": 1. 1.35 bill ft-lb like bullet hitting tree - concentrated energy penetrated instead of pushing. 2. Inertia: Each tower had over 2500 times more mass than the aircraft. 3. Fire was clearly principle cause of collapse.
The main purpose of the present analysis is to prove that the whole tower must have
collapsed if the ﬁre destroyed the load capacity of the majority of columns of a single ﬂoor.
This purpose justiﬁes the optimistic simplifying assumptions regarding survival made at the
outset, which include unlimited plastic ductility (i.e., absence of fracture), uniform distribution of impact forces among the columns, disregard of various complicating details (e.g.,
the possibility that the failures of ﬂoor-column connections and of core columns preceded
the column and tube failure, or that the upper tube got wedged inside the lower tube),
etc. If the tower is found to fail under these very optimistic assumptions, it will certainly
be found to fail when all the detailed mechanisms are analyzed, especially since there are
order-of-magnitude diﬀerences between the dynamic loads and the structural resistance.