Hammo的最近内容

I didn't find this anywhere so...
PCGamer gave it 83/100 - 'Mount & Blade's new multiplayer is a brutal blast. It's a shame the solo side didn't get more attention, though.'

I don't think you'd ever be able to pierce straight through a body in full plater or even chain mail for that.
I'm not too sure about the tensing situation. That does sound like a possible answer though.

kingofnoobia 说:

A sword in my stomach is going to cause exactly the same biological damage than a sword in my back.

点击展开...

No, it really wouldn't. The body isn't symmetrical and any amount of arteries, veins and organs could be pierced either way. If I put a blade through someone from behind and then from the same angle, height, pitch etc. from the front. I guarantee you the biological damage would be totally different.

kingofnoobia 说:

You're on a battlefield, friend. You'll have to do your stab just as quickly as when you were doing it from the front.

点击展开...

If I use what you say and assume that not only are you stabbing them as quickly but with the same impact as from the front you would do more damage from behind. I apologise if what I'm about to say is untrue but from the look of it a lot of people against this idea have it in their minds that because muscle can't stop steel it can't slow it down.
Take a piece of cardboard and put an orange behind it. Get a knife and stab through the cardboard into the orange. Now take a second piece of cardboard and place it and a new piece of card in front of the orange. Stab. There WILL be a difference in the penetration of the orange. Now assume that the card was your muscle when it is relaxed and the orange is say, your kidney. The second piece of card takes into account the tensing of muscles and jarring of body parts when the soldier sees a strike coming (hell that's what flinching is for, bracing).
This is of course, not taking into account the armour and differences in thickness in front and behind, facings etc.

Now if we assume what you said did NOT include the strength of a swing, the soldier would (likely) strike harder from behind because they have more time (given it may be fractions of a second but still more time none the less). This, consequently, would inflict a greater wound.

I would also like to throw into the arguement that within a battle it would be a rather confusing thing and it would be very rare for a soldier to produce successful blow after blow. The majority of strikes would have been glancing so the damage inflicted would be minimal. Striking from behind gives your opponent no time to dodge, block or parry and would likely result in a successful blow.


Having said all of that. I don't think it would be a viable mechanic to add to MP for many reasons.
1. It would most likely be hard to balance because of the actual values involved with health, calculations based on speed, direction etc.
2. It would probably ruin the experience completely.
The above 2 being the most prevalent to me.

May I suggest the two finger technique. You click with your index finger and then your middle finger in fast succession.
WARNING: Finger cramp may occur.

Thats some old school cheating.

Again. I won't argue with you, you are right there I suppose. I didn't really intend much of what I said to you, it was more at RonuR but nevermind. I'll stop posting and let this die.

You win. I concede. I really cannot be bothered to post another arguement. Just notice who started this thread though before you aim your flamer at me.


The search in the top right doesn't have that option. -sigh-

A. Yet people still do.
B. I'm sure the bandwidth is ridiculously small. As for what people SHOULD read, you're right, it is there. But they DON'T and my point is by telling them they SHOULD have gone there you just keep this thread alive.

DameGreyWulf 说:

It's not hard at all, you're just being lazy and ignorant.

点击展开...

Actually, you are the one being ignorant, not lazy, but ignorant none the less.

Everyone isn't aware of there being an answer around or maybe they don't have the TIME to look. Also, I only asked because I didn't follow the links posted because I assumed they would just show the ranks and not explain them. Next time maybe I'll use your beloved search bar.

DameGreyWulf 说:

They're told to search because that is what they are supposed to do. Get over it. Don't like it? Go somewhere else.


A more accurate example is someone killing someone and protesting they shouldn't be punished because they didn't know they weren't supposed to.

点击展开...

Don't like it, go somewhere else? Who do you think you are? I'm allowed to voice my opinion, you know, that's what a forum is for.

NB One person has gotten away with murder because he didn't know he shouldn't kill. Good try.

hexxoo 说:

a quite useless feature honestly,

点击展开...

Actually after about 10/20 four man fights you can get 10 recruits to quite a high tier without them ever seeing battle.

Okay let me put it this way.
It isn't hard per se but if you type in forum ranks to the search bar in the top right. You wouldn't have gotten much help if you didn't understand its format.

DameGreyWulf 说:

It's not hard... at all.

And not knowing how does not excuse refusing to learn.

点击展开...

A. If someone knows not of the search bar they cannot learn to use it without guidance. (Although that has absolutely no relevance to what I said.)
B. An online forum is designed to have threads, he made one. Why should he have to use search?

What you're saying would be like me saying, you are going to sit a degree entry level paper on hydroponics but because you don't know what that is to that standard you still have to sit it.

Magorian Aximand 说:

I was a new member once. It wasn't hard for me then.

点击展开...

From what I've seen a lot of the people using this forum will be of different technical abilities and while I would agree with you that searching for content isn't exactly a demanding task, a less abled member or even one that isn't familiar with forums shouldn't be told to use the search bar every time. In fact, this just goes against what you want. If someone comes in and posts the relative information as the first response the post will die and you won't have to see it again.

The dealio is that a lot of NEW members don't. That is all.

Archonsod 说:

mucat 说:

While we are on the subject, maybe bald character should momentarily blind their opponent in daylight as long as he/she is not wearing helmet?

点击展开...

Already in. It's the HDR setting.

点击展开...

It shouldn't be optional. Needs to be automatically ON for bald characters.

Third tab under where? Is this a secret holy grail I never got let in on?

My desktop.

EDIT: Couldn't hold it in.

Janlulhannes 说:

Ambalon 说:

Nazglim 说:

Eeh, having Torrents isn't illegal.
Sharing them is.
And it is not enough to warrant a forum ban in any case.
Sharing a torrent isn't illegal by itself. I could use a torrent to send a report to my boss for instance.

点击展开...

Downloading is illegal.
You downloaded information to view this page.

点击展开...

I am 100% in my right to download movies and music in the Netherlands. It is legal here. I'd only be doing something illegal if I'd upload music/movies. Thats where newsgroups come in the picture
Oh my god, I just looked that up. That's so awesome. I'm moving to the Netherlands!

点击展开...

As far as I'm aware on this subject there are loads of reasons why and one of the largest is the fact women have periods and also, 100+ men who are away from home and haven't had 'any' in a while. It isn't uncommon for rape to occur.
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just my 2 cents.

I don't wear helmets because you look way more badass without them and I get one shotted by Raiders/Bandits all the time. I still haven't learned my lesson.