Crispy129的最近内容

Every time I try and launch the modding kit, it stalls for a second and then crashes. Any suggestions would be appreciated. The game launches fine through the stable or beta versions.

Thanks

I believe it only happens with the trained spearmen. If a troop is assigned with just polearm weapons, then they have a chance of spawning without a weapon at all. If they are assigned a polearm and another type of weapon, then they'll always be armed. There needs to be a guarantee polearm flag I guess. Also, that will allow modders to make units that only use polearms in all situations.

Waihti 说:

It's time to say

thank you

for 10000+ downloads for all versions of Diplomacy, many suggestions and bug reports. Diplomacy wouldn't be what it is without you. Keep it up and I am sure we will see many great features bringing M&B Warband to the next level!


Special thanks to:

Aeon (great suggestions, artwork)
dumblor (great suggestions)

点击展开...

Really, I think it would be more appropriate to thank you guys. I've never seen someone update their mod so quickly! You're very dedicated and have added all the features M&B should've had. Honestly, if you're not already, you should look into being a designer for a company somewhere.

P.S. About the 2.3 update, domestic policy is awesome!!

Captain_Octavius 说:

possum 说:

the invisible walls on random maps are still there :/

点击展开...

I think that is working as intended. If it bothers you, there is a tweak to make battle maps a LOT larger, so you will rarely ever get to the borders.

点击展开...

The problem with txt tweaks is that I don't know how to edit spawns through them. So, I always have messed up spawns with large battle size. (They're about 15 feet away from me)

possum 说:

there is a new crosshair color, for throwing weapons at least.

its yellow/brown with a red dot in the middle and i see no option to turn it back to white again.

why do they change things noone is complaining about without giving us the option to have it the way it was?

点击展开...

At least it's only in multiplayer, oddly enough.

lazylogs 说:

Crispy129 说:

Actually, Archonsod, you have a point about Tropico 3 and Magesty 2. I could argue all day long that those games were made so many years later that you might consider a graphics update a sequel because of the huge differences. But, as I said above, it's all subjective and I don't feel like arguing. Especially not with you  .  I was disappointed with both of those games though I admit.

Have a nice day,
Crispy

点击展开...

Well that was a crisp reply yeah like that one never gets old 

点击展开...

I changed it now, are you happy?

Actually, Archonsod, you have a point about Tropico 3 and Magesty 2. I could argue all day long that those games were made so many years later that you might consider a graphics update a sequel because of the huge differences. But, as I said above, it's all subjective and I don't feel like arguing. Especially not with you.  I was disappointed with both of those games though I admit.



Have a nice day,
Crispy

2. I've never seen a game add features on to an existing project in a limited manner and market it as a sequel

点击展开...

Crispy129 说:

Actually, to be honest, Warband has more features than the average  stand alone expansion pack. Why people can't understand that this is a  new game is beyond me.

点击展开...

Quote messed up, don't want to fix it. You said "contradict much?"

Not really. The word "limited" is relative. In this way, I use it to mean "limited relative to additions usually made by games marketed as sequels". As in, they didn't change the gameplay significantly. Do you think Warband is a complete game just like M&B is? The OP was saying "it wasn't a game at all". I wasn't suggesting it was a sequel there, I was just saying it certainly is "a game". That's what the OP was trying to argue. Which, like an above poster said, makes him retarded.

Anyway, all this is ridiculous. What you think it should be called is entirely subjective. I admit I shouldn't of said that Taleworlds doesn't know what an expansion or sequel is. If you've ever worked in retail you know that companies will "stretch the truth" a bit to market a product better. Maybe Taleworlds knew it was probably an expansion, but they said it was something else to make it seem more "complete". Who knows? If you believe it could be called a sequel, then fine. I don't know why you got defensive though, I'm on your side. Honestly though, arguing about something as stupid as what a company calls their game, who cares? Warband is a very nice expansion, and M&B is the best indie game ever made.

EDIT: You might have using the word "you" collectively, but I'm not in the group you were addressing. Anyway, have a nice day. 

Kleidophoros 说:

Please do list why o humble forumite

If it doesn't matter what they call it, why do you care?

It doesn't hurt my feelings a bit, i didn't make it, i ain't sellin it, i am just playin it. It's people like you who are butthurt seein you are the ones openin thread after thread everyday complainin what warband is and what it isn't and what it should sell for and why you aint gettin your life-time-free gamin fix.

点击展开...

Actually, I didn't start this thread and I never ever complained. Read my earlier posts. I just explained to him why this was a full game. He didn't understand how they could charge for it, so I told him. I love Warband, I SPECIFICALLY TOLD HIM THAT IT WAS WORTH IT, and mentioned how ridiculous it was that he wanted a free updates for life. Please, read the thread before you make baseless assumptions. BTW, M&B is my 2nd favorite game of all times, I have barely ever started a thread (never to complain), and Warband is well worth the money. The only thing I said is the same thing that basically everyone has said. There are only 3 points I have made.

1. This game is definitely worthy of buying, and is obviously more than an update as it adds many things to the game.
2. I've never seen a game add features on to an existing project in a limited manner and market it as a sequel
3. I don't give a **** what it's called, it's THEIR BUSINESS to call it whatever they want to.

Is that simple enough for you? 

EDIT: Here's the specific quote so you don't have to find it:

Crispy129 说:

dubhdara 说:

I played the trial of Warband and thought it OK (I hope the custom battles improve in the full version and the horrible green texture problems!) and so I put my activation serial number in only to discover (when it was denied) that Warband is considered an "independent game".

I think this is a little deceptive in my opinion. Warband is the same game as Mount&Blade (to which we were promised lifetime upgrades). Just because a new version has a few extra features and is a named version, does not mean it is a new game. This is certainly not the convention in other games, is it? Adding MP and a few other tweaks is not a new game.

Does anyone know if the "old" game will continue to be upgraded?

点击展开...

Actually, it's a convention in other games yes. Ever head of Civ 3lay the World? How about all 83 Sims expansions they've released? Those are new games. Actually, to be honest, Warband has more features than the average stand alone expansion pack. Why people can't understand that this is a new game is beyond me. Maybe M&B is played by geezers who haven't bought a game since Darklands. I'm not sure. The only problem I have with it is that they call it a sequel when it surely isn't. Also saying it added "a few extra features" seems intentionally misleading to me.

EDIT: Complaining about the value of M&B seems absurd to me. What other games allowed you to buy them for $20 in beta and then receive updates for many years and eventually a full version? Please....

点击展开...

Kleidophoros 说:

Crispy129 说:

Paradox is a very 2nd rate publisher, and TW has no experience so I don't think they know what an expansion or sequel is.

点击展开...

So those two companies don't know an expansion or sequel is and what they should call their game but you do. Jebus, people and their opinion of themselves

点击展开...

Warband obviously doesn't fit into the common definition of what a sequel is. If you need me to list the reasons why, please let me know. They can call it whatever they would like. As I said it's just semantics. It doesn't matter at all to me. I know that it's a great game regardless. That doesn't mean it's a full game though. You can call a turd a gold nugget, it doesn't change anything. Also, you know nothing about me or my personality. If you did, you would know that I am very humble. I'm just stating the obvious. I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings.

uly 说:

Life-time free upgrade is just ridiculous, but:

Fact:
M&B fans were promised an expansion.  Warband was initially announced as an expansion.  Throughout most of its development, was discussed and advertised as an expansion.  Even after its release, many sources still consider it an expansion, including most major game news sites.

Fact:
By industry standard, this is still what would be considered an expansion: based on the same engine, mostly recycled assets, basically the same gameplay.  Yes, it offers many improvements, but it's all along the line of an expansion rather than replacement.  Any of the recent Total War expansions easily dwarf the new content offered in Warband, for example.

Now, TW and Paradox are of course free to call it a proper sequel.  But they've done a very bad job at communicating this to the M&B fans, who had been nothing but supportive, as well as the press.  (Case in point: this forum is still labeled "Mount&Blade: Warband Expansion".)  With all the signs and sources suggesting that it is strictly an expansion, a potential buyer cannot be reasonably expected to magically know that TW&Paradox are now calling it a sequel.

I say they deserve any backlash they incurr.

点击展开...

Yea, I'd have to agree. Paradox is a very 2nd rate publisher, and TW has no experience so I don't think they know what an expansion or sequel is. It's just semantics, but if they were going to market it as a sequel they should've made it more obvious. Still, I don't think it's really a big deal. Many expansions today are stand alone ones, so someone buying M&B just because they thought Warband was an expansion should've done more research.

EDIT: Also, I have never seen a game company promote a game with this level of content as a sequel/full game. It is a great expansion pack, but it simply isn't a full game.

lazylogs 说:

@ Cripsy

But they *didn't* call it a sequel but an expantion (which is why it has lead to a lot of people buying both games in hope of playing Warband). What I don't get is that, I have never heard of an expantion for which you didn't need to pay for.... where do these people gate the idea??

点击展开...

It was originally referred to as an expansion, but then was quickly changed to being marketed as a full fledged sequel. Here's a thread about the interview with Strategy Informer: http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?topic=107346.new#new

They actually discuss this at length with Paradox.

EDIT: Did people really buy M&B to play Warband? I didn't hear about that.

Da-V-Man 说:

You raise a good point. I would rather have the ability to adjust it via a slider than to just forcibly change it for everyone.

Also, just for reference, is the fov for 1st and 3rd person the same or not?

点击展开...

Well, that question is kind of irrelevant since FOV is the viewing angle. But, with a 3rd person camera, it's so far back that it could have a FOV of 75 but still show more, since it isn't from a person's perspective. (1st person)

EDIT: But no, it's not the same.

dubhdara 说:

I played the trial of Warband and thought it OK (I hope the custom battles improve in the full version and the horrible green texture problems!) and so I put my activation serial number in only to discover (when it was denied) that Warband is considered an "independent game".

I think this is a little deceptive in my opinion. Warband is the same game as Mount&Blade (to which we were promised lifetime upgrades). Just because a new version has a few extra features and is a named version, does not mean it is a new game. This is certainly not the convention in other games, is it? Adding MP and a few other tweaks is not a new game.

Does anyone know if the "old" game will continue to be upgraded?

点击展开...

Actually, it's a convention in other games yes. Ever head of Civ 3lay the World? How about all 83 Sims expansions they've released? Those are new games. Actually, to be honest, Warband has more features than the average stand alone expansion pack. Why people can't understand that this is a new game is beyond me. Maybe M&B is played by geezers who haven't bought a game since Darklands. I'm not sure. The only problem I have with it is that they call it a sequel when it surely isn't. Also saying it added "a few extra features" seems intentionally misleading to me.

EDIT: Complaining about the value of M&B seems absurd to me. What other games allowed you to buy them for $20 in beta and then receive updates for many years and eventually a full version? Please....

BumpInTheNight 说:

Sounds like someone needs to learn about triple-screen FOVs and invest in that sort of tech if they want nearly 1800 views.  Don't get me wrong though, I still think these values should be editable to suite the player's tastes at least in single player mode.

/I has this tech and it works as advertised.

点击展开...

Actually, I have used ATI eyefinity and it's much better with it. This suggestion is more for the 95% of people who don't have 3 monitors set up. (Even though people with 3 monitors would benefit from this as well)

Eyefinity is great, because it actually works similar to your real vision. When you look forward, the others monitors are more to the side, so you get the effect of peripheral vision to an extent. The only thing I don't like about it, is that it's hard to find monitors without huge bezels. Look at this guys' setup:

http://www.ultrashock.com/images/v1/images_fun/multimonitor.jpg

Also, I'm trying to find it, but there was one no bezel one piece monitor with 3 huge screens that was meant for universities/businesses that cost 5-10 grand. I can't seem to find it now.

EDIT: Found it, also the 72 inch version costs $25,000, so maybe it's a bit out of my price range,