It's an early access game, YOU choose to support a beta product.
I'm not even just defending them, i'm saying that if people want to have ANY hope of being listened to, this behavior is 100% surefire way to get disregarded.
Even YOUR use of language is a great example, you said two years ago you were respectful?
Well lets take a look at your thread shall we:
********** Good features from Warband which are still missing in Bannerlord **********
Thread is a perfect example.
You meantioning that some people say the game is shallow and lifeless is completely unecessary, your wording is GARBAGE.
Already from the getgo you're starting the thread with disrespect.
Some of these seem small on their own, but all together, they create a major improvement in variety and immersion. Without (most of) these features, or similar features to replace their benefits, Bannerlord will not be a good sequel to Warband.
Taleworlds has said it is committed to making Bannerlord to the community's expectations. Based on various threads and polls on the forum and elsewhere, a large part of the community wants Bannerlord to have all the good features of Warband. So, can we please get an official statement from Taleworlds on this?
You're implying that these features NEED to be added for this game to be good
"Bannerlord will not be a good sequel to warband" - What a joke, you were never respectful
I agree that a lot of these features would be fun to have, but its not neccesary for a good game, i'd rather see them innovate and add new things, which they have, which is why its a **** comparison.
The "Veterans" on this forum are a joke, Masturbatory banners of how dissatisfied they are, whiny posts all over the place. The forums are toxic as hell, meanwhile they think they speak for the rest of the playerbase because of how much time they've spent on the forum.
Honestly you need to look no further than to look at Blood Gryphon and Tercio_Viejo's banners to see this self important attitude.