Arcaian的最近内容

I don't think it's a stat that one can easily see in the game's menus, but from what I understand, the profitability of your workshops is dependent on the upkeep to pay for workers, the cost of raw materials, and the selling price of what you produce. This trait reduces the cost of that upkeep by 20%, which should raise the income you're receiving from you workshops!

Spinozart1 说:

Basically it is done by hand.
If you want you can use my mod (I will update it today, changing the data format).
But it is still raw txt data and I'm using a pivot table in excel to create the above tables.

点击展开...

With your mod outputting it straight to raw text files, it'd be pretty easy to knock up a little python or R script that translates that over into the tables and figures being made here. If I end up with some time I could have a look at it, but if it's raw text separated by commas or whitespace, something as simple as pandas' read_csv will likely do the trick, followed by a matplotlib/seaborn barplot. Might help speed things up!

You can pick fights with the gang leaders - you just need to go into the town scene and approach one of the back alleys/waterways/etc that they control. Pick a fight with the criminals there, and when you defeat them, you get the option for staying around and fighting the leader. It'll be a fight of your party (in their social outfits) vs some custom thief troops and the gang leader. If you defeat them, you get some trade goods + normal fight drops, relation gains with the owner of the city and the other gangs of the city, and a relationship drop with the gang that controlled the territory. That gang also loses control of the territory, (seemingly?) lowering their noteable's power. As far as I know, you can't take over the territory - but it's not a bad way to get some XP and relations, plus control who has power in the city.

Lesbosisles 说:

For my current playthrough, I never had so many deaths in one battle. The OP's screenshot seems more like a coincidence rather than regularity. And I have many large battles 1000 vs 1000 in the current playthrough. I've lost about 4 companions in ~20 game years and a few nobles (including 2 wives). Others always get wounded, go to jail, escape, repeat.

2% is WAY too low. With this death chance I can go play Warband and won't feel the difference, because of the immortal lords here and there.

点击展开...

Pulling some numbers out of nowhere really, but if we assume each lord is bringing 80 troops, we've got 25 lords on the battlefield. They spawn first and often fight recklessly, so I'm going to assume 20 of those 25 (80%) go unconscious - not exactly a stretch. 10% chance puts it at ~2.5 lords dying each battle; 2% puts it at ~0.4 lords dying each battle. The OP's screenshot is definitely unfortunate - double as many as one would expect from random chance from my random assumptions. But even at 2%, if you have 3 battles of this size in each war, you'd got a ~99.8% chance of having at least one noble die - and a very large chance multiple die. That's hardly impossible to see happen in a campaign, but less likely to lead to a depopulated field of nobles than ~7 nobles dying each war.

(my numbers might be off if it's only a 10% chance to die when they're hit with a lethal blow, and other blows that don't deal enough damage/are blunt/whatever don't have a chance to kill them, I haven't checked that)

SOku 说:

Yes you're confirming my point earlier, a freaking UI change as a piece of evidence, really ? Are you joking or something ?
With that in mind, could you elaborate your thoughts further ? This is the exact same debate that happened in another thread, for some reasons past the UI rant nobody could explain me why they logically think the shalowness of that game was magically because of a console port.
And you were on that thread.

I agree the debate isn't starting very well for you if you think you made good logical points above.

点击展开...

I have to agree with you here - there's a large chunk of this forum's population that seems to go to "simplified for console ports" as their go-to reason for everything with seemingly no justification, and I don't think there's almost any backing to this assumption.

Wow, that looks very cool! I'll try that out ASAP

Thanks very much for the work you've put into this mod! I saw it'd come out, figured it'd be an interesting experience and booted up Bannerlord again, and have had a lot of fun working my way up the ranks of the Battanian armies. I'm glad to see the changes to being a bodyguard, I think that makes them far less punishing. I like the sound of some of the features you've discussed - a scene for the camp sounds interesting, as does the potential for starting a desertion with other troops. I particularly like the option to do something while you're travelling, a great improvement on Warband's Freelancer. If you're taking suggestions, might it be possible to add another option to heal for the wounded? It'd be an interesting way to increase your Medicine, would only be possible when wounded troops are present in the party/army, and could potentially boost or lower loyalty/fame/relations, depending on how successful you were.

There's not much interaction with the internal politics system in many ways - it might be more interesting to have this option picked at declaration of war, and then require a vote by the council (likely with no/minimal influence cost) to change it during the war

Knight of calradia 说:

I would recommend going for 10 in trainer and tactics skills rather than into the main character boosting skills.,you should know this stuff, but I'll just say anyway what these two skills does, trainer: faster training depending of you character's level, tactics, increases your units performance in battles, super helpful.

点击展开...

Except both of those are exceptionally useless if you're soloing? You have no troops.

I've never soloed, but I would imagine the most efficient way for the sea raiders is to ride just around their maximum range, they'll waste a LOT of ammo like that. The longbows are harder, unless you've got a ranged weapon and can snipe them. Not sure how you'd deal with them.

spyczech 说:

Or TW could just implement it in the first place... I'm hoping they improve more than just the graphics and stuff.

点击展开...

Pretty sure they said they weren't planning on doing it

Yukisuna 说:

This might not be helpful at all, but you should consider taking a look at the coding for "Battle time". It may or may not help with stability between players, both on the world map and in battles. I'm especially excited to see how battles will happen, for example how this might work if one player goes into a battle and another doesnt. (I imagine going to fight a looter pack, and then dozens of outlaws coming in wave after wave as they reach your party on the world map. Please, do not implement PvP, at least not yet. It would be a nightmare for other players to be able to join in on the opposing side during your battles.

点击展开...

Yeah, real time battles would make the early game a complete pain. I think the best solutions to a real time battle would be:

1: Implement Freelancer style joining a lord, which makes early game easier
2: Send out patrols that can effectively fight one or two parties of outlaws

That way you could either fight them and get reinforcements or get screwed over, but you can always retreat if too many join. Would make it... interesting. I agree with co-op focus, but it's designed for LAN play, your friends really shouldn't be trying to ruin the game for you.

Metalfist 说:

Content includes development information.

点击展开...

Well you certainly have an interesting view point then. The currently released information has already been discussed, the thread was falling off the front couple of pages, so I doubt the author complains that I put it back on the front.

Or, stop telling me what to do, not breaking any forum rules. I highly doubt asking if there's any new info will lead to a 'hostage situation'.

Afraid you're thinking too much into it - they don't recognise you as a friendly sieger, they just see it's under siege. They'll help you in the battle if they're passing by, or if you specifically ask them to help you with the siege. Otherwise the Marshal sees that it's already under siege (by someone) and so moves onto a target that the army can help with.

By the way, just because the marshal led the siege doesn't mean he gets the land, often others do. For every battle lost (and I think land lost) the Marshall gets controversy, which pretty much stops him from being marshall after a while.

The AI lords are completely useless in most cases in this game, you'll learn that. They defend all the wrong places, attack the wrong ones and the like. Much better when you're Marshall and you can at least lead a fight of a thousand men in the right direction.

Metalfist 说:

Leave the Dev to release content when he wants otherwise the thread just becomes a hostage situation and the dev gets angry.

点击展开...

Huh? I wasn't asking for content, just wondering how development was going?

The_dragon 说:

Konstantin_Dreadful 说:

When can I download the latest version of the mod?

点击展开...

You can't. I didn't uploaded it.

点击展开...

How is the work going?