7heTexanRebel的最近内容

guiskj 说:

You can split and merge formations on the battlefield. However, what you are asking would be problematic, because there are 2 types of AI during battle: individual troop AI and formation AI. If you make a formation that is half infantry and half archers, I would imagine that the formation AI would not work as well.

Still, this is something you can try in Custom Battles. Split your infantry and Archery formations in half and merge them together to create hybrids and see how they perform.

点击展开...

This is functionality I was unaware of. I would prefer not to have to do it at the start of every battle though

danEN 说:

What makes them decide to declare war currently?

点击展开...

I would put money on it being a purely random dice roll, maybe some weight from the kingdoms proximity but not enough to stop sturgia and aserai from being at war close to the start of the some of my games

Oakenlix 说:

It doesn't exist and I'm not sure it should, micro-managing your troops to such an extent seems like overkill to me.

点击展开...

What if I want two equivalent groups of cavalry on either flank? That doesn't seem very micro intensive at all. I feel like half the people play this game purely by charging all of their troops in at once.

Meraun 说:

So if you TAB in battle, all your remaining Troops leave the battle and surivie and you just walk of?!?

点击展开...

No, but the enemy has to close the distance to your Fians for a second time.

Wait until you get some fian champions.

I would prefer the vanilla game to be playable in the late game without mods.

Yeah I hate how units completely drop their shield to waist hight when doing something other than blocking

I wish you could at least create mini armies from just your clan parties. I agree with some random merc not being able to lead the lords of the realm but I really cant get the boys together to go take that poorly defended fief?

It sounds pretty cool but I don't think this is something you need in the base game. I know it's supposed to be Calradia 200 years before Warband but that's quickly forgotten while playing on the significantly different map.

Lovec1990 说:

well if character and NPC use shield properly combat would be harder

点击展开...

That's a good thing though

They might be on a template but there's definitely some variation. I got a smith companion who has 5 end and 10 vig, strangely enough he didn't have a focus point in smithing with 60 skill. Also none of his melee stats were below 100.

It's unfortunately just one of the many things not yet implemented. You can also deliver your demands to a lord so that you don't lose relation with notables

I also have this same issue, no mods. Crashes after prisoner screen.
i3-4170 @ 3.7GHz
GTX 1060
16GB RAM

CrouchingLemur 说:

If there was a skill you never use, why would you bother increasing it?

点击展开...

I was specifically thinking of Charm, it's a skill you WILL use, but are unlikely to get points in until much later in the game since you can really only level it by spending influence or releasing lords.
When you lay out the numbers it doesn't look too OP, and you can rationalize it like your character is reading up on the skill or something. But in that case why not just have skill books you can buy to passively level up a skill?
I think the problem you're addressing is certainly real, but I kinda like where they went with the skill system, it's just got a very unfinished feel at the moment.

I'm a little mixed on this. On one hand its a way to level up skills that are currently borderline impossible to level. On the other hand I could somehow get a character with extremely high levels in a skill that I've never actually used.
I think once they flesh out the actions you can take to level certain skills, and fix bugs related to actions granting XP, the current system is capable of working well.
I do think they should bring back shared XP after battles though. I find that my high tier units end up stealing all the kills and my low tier troops take forever to upgrade.