Says you, oh master of Bannerlord. Truly we know that the game is actually bad.The game's rating is average. The game's quality in terms of feature-completeness and functionality is below satisfactory (regardless of what is considered average in the industry).
Lol, lmao.As said before in this very thread, yes there are plenty of idiots who never complain and consume any crap the industry throws at them, that's why Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is still selling.
However that doesn't mean that normal people with standards should just ignore the many flaws of a game. So why do you keep bringing that up? Who does it benefit to say that?
"So many plebians don't actually know what a good game is like, however I have taste and know that these games are actually horrible. Look at those dirty peasants playing... playing Call of Duty. I shudder at the thought.
No, it doesn't. If an Artist sells an album they don't lose control over what music they want to make, the same goes for this. They prioritize what they want to make and not what the community wants. You aren't some stock holder at TW, your a passionate fan. In the best scenario both the fans vision and the devs will be one, however that isn't always the case. That's kinda where mods are going to come in. But, to say that it isn't their game when you buy it is absurd. You're not buying stock at TW, your voice isn't elevated because you own a copy.It stops being "their game" when they charge money for it, receive hundreds of millions of dollars from the community, and say "we are going to make the game to meet community expectations".
I'm not saying they should be adding any old feature a random community member asks for, but they should certainly not be prioritising stuff nobody asked for over stuff the paying customers were told was going to be in the game when they bought it.