@LDominating i wanted this thread to bring awareness to the different troops in the game showcasing how they differ, what are the weakness players should be aware of, and if they are fixable with perks. Likewise what strength they should capitalize on and build towards perfecting.
How different weapons impact performance or how armor can carry some otherwise bad units to great performers.
This post should have been about what kind of armies and groups of units you can run together and with what captains, speculating on how units could perform with alternative equipment.
Bringing up to date awareness to the worst performers so that TW could buff some of them, and nerf the too good ones.
Instead it turned into a ****show of people stating it's irrelevant, as Khans are OP and archers are superior. thanks Sherlocks. You know who you are.
Some people being so close minded to not even consider that players might want to play in different ways than Khuzait cheese archers or battanian Fian blasting. Going as far as to indirectly state that any other playstyle is stupid and not fun.
I get that there is a most optimal way to play, yet they seem to not understand that people can play whatever the hell they want, it's a bloody singleplayer game.
I don't get how a guide who's aim is to bring awareness with, i don't even have any idea how many hours i have worked on it at this point, can be turn into a battleground for people to only see the game in a negative way.
Talking as if myself, a 4K hours veteran, have no idea that arrows are too good and unbalanced. Like i said there are other places to discuss that manner, this is not the one.
The thing that upsets me the most is that there is care about the work, i personally care not only about informing players but helping some bad units get their very deserved buffs, and point the finger at the ones who clearly need some nerfing.
I am willing to bet, and i might take a loss, than those who are quick to judge haven't watched even a single one. Instead replaying with months old videos with no information whatsoever and worse testing as proof.
You can spot those who truly respect the work as you can have conversations with them that are relevant to the analysis.
Unfortunately i didn't want to make this post myself. if it was for me i would never post anything on this website, not anymore. But i was asked to and then did it.
the reason being that for many players it's simply not worth it putting your work on the forums, as the replies tend to be among the most toxic i get on any platform. just view the comments on the videos and you get the idea of how different they are.
Especially when you are like me and you like to cover CONTROVERSIAL information.
Some people need to chill for real. They can't keep bashing on people who have a different opinion until they force them off the platform.
As i said in the past, that behavior doesn't make the forum a place were you can have conversations. it drives anybody who has a different opinion off, and some have become masters at doing so.
I don't go onto other players guides and post to state how uninformed, useless, wrong, outdated, irrelevant they are.
There are some people who spread disinformation for the sake of money.
But there are also some that genuinely care, and as wrong as they might be. ****ting on their hard work calling it irrelevant, taking out of the drawer months old poll votes to mock and laugh at their hard work is not what should be at the base of any healthy community member.
Many creators for Bannerlord prefer to never post here for a reason, instead they create their own communities on other platforms.
There is something fundamentaly wrong in that.