Is there any new features or systems at all? I just came back too but I don't feel like starting a new campaign if there's nothing new. Patch notes is filled with bug fix and optimizations.I just jump from 1.6.4 to 1.7.1 today and I'm disappointed, I gave a big jump in the versions, and didn't saw nothing special
As I said, I jumped two or three versions of the game and a didn't note any big change in the game, but I play with lots of mods and as many of those mods are dead, I feel the game more empty.Funny how one dev is communicating and we're getting 4 pages of ****storm, essentially proving Duh right about communicating carelessly being a bad idea.
Is there any new features or systems at all? I just came back too but I don't feel like starting a new campaign if there's nothing new. Patch notes is filled with bug fix and optimizations.
It isn’t though lol. When has TW actually implemented anything we want. Look at the class system. Everyone hates it. And yet it’s still there.Claiming that there is no community involvement or that no community involvement is wanted is simply not true - and, to me, seems counter productive. Your new post is more nuanced.
TW could delete the class system tomorrow and reinstate an exact copy of Warbands equipment system... and you would still be on here demanding a refund roy.It isn’t though lol. When has TW actually implemented anything we want. Look at the class system. Everyone hates it. And yet it’s still there.
Suggestions have led to hundreds of changes by now. We actively communicate the community driven ones for modding in the dedicated section, if you are looking for examples. I am pretty sure I shared some for SP before as well. To give a more recent one - we are looking into the ability to assign companions to formations. (Read - It may or may not happen.) As always, I don't discuss MP.It isn’t though lol. When has TW actually implemented anything we want. Look at the class system. Everyone hates it. And yet it’s still there.
Hah, as if that's any relief. It's hard to match the the emotional sensitivity and finicky temperament of some of the people involved in the forum's moderation anyway:seems worth posting a reminder that devs do not warn or mute people and aren't really involved in the forum's moderation.
Very amusing. That was in reference to the atrocious moderating in the forum. Now about responding to my comments?Ah. Well. Okay, then. Congratulations, you got me trolled, I guess?
< snip >TW could delete the class system tomorrow and reinstate an exact copy of Warbands equipment system... and you would still be on here demanding a refund roy.
Let's try to keep some intellectual honesty to this conversation. You will never be positive about this game.
"A creature who has spent his life creating one particular representation of his selfdom, will die rather than become the antithesis of that."
You didn't in any way respond to my comment; you merely shouted vague nonsense in the hope I don't notice...< snip >
Orion does a tough thankless task -and I genuinely don't believe he really has much love for this title anymore tbh; making his task even more thankless.Hah, as if that's any relief. It's hard to match the the emotional sensitivity and finicky temperament of some of the people involved in the forum's moderation anyway:
Very amusing. That was in reference to the atrocious moderating in the forum. Now about responding to my comments?Are you going to close every suggestion thread "because TW's never going to do it"?
If you want to lock a thread because it's too far gone into interpersonal quarrels say it as much and don't pretend to have done it just "because the suggestion was pointless as it would never even be considered". Mate, that's just a tasteless joke at a point when as much as a pittance of the...forums.taleworlds.com
You don't realise the sheer audacity of the assumptions you're making about him and now me? Like that I was hoping you wouldn't notice the comment I tagged you on? Your comment is an attempt to diagnose Roy with pessimism and defeatism and is based on... what exactly? Confucian philosophy?You didn't in any way respond to my comment; you merely shouted vague nonsense in the hope I don't notice...
Which part did you not agree with?
You know how they like to go on about having volunteered? So I disagree, you can absolutely blame a person for not recognising he's incapable of performing his duty professionally - especially at the expense of others. That is presuming he cares about the quality and groundedness of his decisions, which I don't believe for a second.Admittedly I think some of his moderation is more emotional then logical... but I don't think after all this time we can blame him for that.
Maybe we should follow @Brano example, the sp is trash and the mp is just dead and will remain so, we are expecting too much for nothing.This game, as any other game, is not essential part of my life. I take it as it is, not waiting/expecting anything.
First of all my comments were directed at Roy; a user I have spoken to regularly before - I've got a pretty good idea penned down regarding this mental attitude towards this game. I sincerely doubt he will ever be satisfied. I don't think that's a bold assumption at all.; if anything - as much as we may argue; I think that's one statement myself and Roy can agree on.You don't realise the sheer audacity of the assumptions you're making about him and now me? Like that I was hoping you wouldn't notice the comment I tagged you on? Your comment is an attempt to diagnose Roy with pessimism and defeatism and is based on... what exactly? Confucian philosophy?
And say your prognosis is correct, what is that meant to mean anyhow? The cynical defeatist minority won't be as enthused with development steps in the right direction and therefore it's illogical to make those demands?
Maybe we should follow @Brano example, the sp is trash and the mp is just dead and will remain so, we are expecting too much for nothing.
You know how they like to go on about having volunteered? So I disagree, you can absolutely blame a person for not recognising he's incapable of performing his duty professionally - especially at the expense of others. That is presuming he cares about the quality and groundedness of his decisions, which I don't believe for a second.
Can I get a quick mute too, please? < snip >
Not unless you really want to - NoVa
Most blunted posted spam that was also fairly inappropriate and insulting the dev team. That in itself did not warrant the mute, but since warning points linger around for a month those became active, hence the mute.MostBlunted gets muted every day before he has finished his morning coffee. But MadVader? I was trying to see what he said that was so bad. What did he do? Lol ?
I respect the fact that the moderators are quite lenient on this forum; and I understand the reasoning. But I must admit I disagree; I don't think people really respect or value being muted as a punishment. Hell I think MostBlunted might actually do it for fun now.Most blunted posted spam that was also fairly inappropriate and insulting the dev team. That in itself did not warrant the mute, but since warning points linger around for a month those became active, hence the mute.
MadVader also crossed the line and and suggested something inappropriate in regards to the devs and their families. That too would not have resulted in a mute itself, but very well might have. However, he still has numerours active warning points, see above for the result.
I just added TengriBless to the club, who as you might have guesses also has some points left over, since the warning above in itself would not have resulted in a mute.
It's a fairly simple reminder that the fairly lenient line that moderation takes is so that you may participate and unless you step way out of line or do it enough times, you will still be able to participate and hopefully turn yourself around and provide something of value to the community.
However, if you fail to adjust your behaviour and continuously engage in passive-agressive, flame baity or openly hostile behaviour, you head down the road of being not a contributive forumite, but a quarrelsome one. Heading down that road is something that I would not recommend.
I agree. We also had people that appealed after a while and were unbanned as a result. The leniency is something that works well for a lot of forum members, but the long leash is not something all forumites appreciate equally and sometimes that leads to discussions that are longer than would have been necessary.I respect the fact that the moderators are quite lenient on this forum; and I understand the reasoning. But I must admit I disagree; I don't think people really respect or value being muted as a punishment. Hell I think MostBlunted might actually do it for fun now.
I think there are plenty of users - and I will genuinely include myself in this group if I'm being completely honest - who probably should have been banned for some of the things we have said either about other users or the devs. Otherwise we will just go round in circles forever.
I'll do it, get ready for old-school GAMEFAQS style moderation! ??????Are you willing to moderate this forum...?
Whenever I see this argument, I have an urge to puke. People are here complaining for whatever reason they have and that is it.If you don't like Bannerlord - it's really not worth your time spent fighting about it.