Omg the attorney misspoke after days and hours in the courtroom and confused two almost identically sounding loanwords! I bet he even made a typo somewhere in the paperwork! What a ****ing loser! Haha! That means everything he says is nonsense!
Nobody claims the algorithms are politically biased, just that they don't depict reality and should therefore not be admitted as evidence, or at the minimum with clear and emphatic instructions that this is more like a painting or a witness testimony, i.e. something fallible and potentially inaccurate and not as most people would intuit - a 100% accurate, photorealistic, if you will, depiction of what happened.
Literally thisJudge buys Rittenhouse lawyer’s inane argument that Apple’s pinch-to-zoom manipulates footage
That’s not how it works.www.theverge.com
Nobody claims the algorithms are politically biased, just that they don't depict reality and should therefore not be admitted as evidence, or at the minimum with clear and emphatic instructions that this is more like a painting or a witness testimony, i.e. something fallible and potentially inaccurate and not as most people would intuit - a 100% accurate, photorealistic, if you will, depiction of what happened.
Sorry mate, but this is your brain on anti-racism. If we're really re-segregaing society now, then yeah the jury SHOULD be all white, because you have the right to be tried by a jury of your peers and from what you're saying whites and nonwhites are not peers.But even under these brave new rules, why should there be any nonwhites involved in the trial at all? Everyone, the defendant and the three victims, are all white.But the judge was of course very impartial and fair and balanced. And the one day long jury selection process was also very thorough. I don't see what could possibly go wrong with this! I would also be curious to know how many if the jurors are white but I wasn't really able to find information on that.
Last edited: