What are you on about? This was my original post:
I never said or implied:
I even started by saying
perhaps to
@MostBlunted.
I know what your original post was...? I responded to it, after all. And yes, you said it to MostBlunted, so? Am I not allowed to ask you questions on your publicly stated opinion or something?
Conceding that I'm not sure - not making a certain contention. Suggesting that he may be right...
I reacted to your post because I was curious about your rationale (opinion), thus I presented you a question on it to expand it. And yes, I know you weren't giving it as some sort of
definite answer (thus your perhaps), I was merely curious
how the rest of your opinion played out. You took great offense to that apparently, and still might be taking offense to it. All of which has all occurred over what is very clearly a great misunderstanding...
That was your entire post!!! I did not cut anything but your "No." in response to my asking about the angry circle jerk.
Look:
That's all you said it is right above my response... Nothing was cut.
You cut the rest out which provided the context of the question above your gif, or do you not remember doing this? Fine, you know what, whatever. Forget it. Instead, I'll focus on more important matters such as defining how my statement was a question by explaining the grammar in it:
the conjunction "so" can be used to connect a previous conversation to a question. This is quite a normal way to grammatically structure a question that connects to a prior discussion, like a question such as "
So, how does that movie end?"
after someone might have mentioned seeing a movie. It
was never a statement of fact on your opinion, it was just a question about how your opinion worked. I have now tried to correct your assumptions and clear this up several times now though. so how about this, one
last time?
I
never questioned that you removed validity of complainers or why they did complain, that was not the meaning of the question. I also
never tried to say you told them "to be quiet",
nor did I ever try to say or imply you gave your opinion as "fact" or the such. I
only ever presented you a question based on your opinion on how older complainers might work
in your opinion. Has that cleared it up any so that we can move this on, or do we have to continue this back and forth of "I said, you said" for several pages?
I'm really starting to wonder if you're ok...
And oh, alright, there we go. Color me surprised. ?