"Would" ? Academics are your sock puppets now?
I'm sure several people toyed with the idea of patiently explaining to him what he does wrong, but he would just argue with you oblivious to the irony of the thread title, instead of recognizing and assimilating instant wisdom.
I'm sure several people toyed with the idea of patiently explaining to him what he does wrong, but he would just argue with you oblivious to the irony of the thread title, instead of recognizing and assimilating instant wisdom. Helping someone who lacks self-awareness is a thankless task.
Here you go. (From the Page 1)*Talks about how you shouldn't argue with people on the internet.*
> Proceeds to argue with every statement under the thread.
Man I love the Taleworlds forums.
And given the situation you people behaving, I'm not going to answer anymore replies on this thread. You guys don't have ideas of your own, you just randomly despise those who has their own ideas. Except the @eddiemccandless. I like the way you argue. If you're still viewing this post I'd like to keep discussing this matter with you in private.Look people, I don't say that you shan't argue or debate "EVERY" person in internet. I'm just telling you have to choose a civil person as much as you are to debate.
They're openly showing who they actually are, not bullying. You can't bully anyone on internet. Except some kind-hearted people gets offended by everything.Everyone just kinda getting along, bullying the new guy on TW hits all the places of my brain that do nostalgia.
Uhm, ok, let's give it a closer look...Everyone just kinda getting along, bullying the new guy on TW hits all the places of my brain that do nostalgia.
....yeah, no regrets.And I'm telling you that prestigious and distinguished proffessors I'm talking about gone beyond "being ordinary" and became "The Elites". The elites will provide us the correct information since they're not obsessed with manipulating people. They're all about being bridge between the facts and the people.
some for centuries
And given the situation you people behaving, I'm not going to answer anymore replies on this thread. You guys don't have ideas of your own, you just randomly despise those who has their own ideas. Except the @eddiemccandless. I like the way you argue. If you're still viewing this post I'd like to keep discussing this matter with you in private.
Uhm, ok, let's give it a closer look...
....yeah, no regrets.
In my experience that's what conferences are all about. It's the rest of the year that you do reading each others' **** and actually learn something.I have met several of the "big names" in my field at conferences and more often than not they were dead drunk.
Yeaaaah I was going to say something about that myself but then I was like, you know, you shouldn't argue people on the internet. I have met several of the "big names" in my field at conferences and more often than not they were dead drunk. Many of them are unable to figure out how to use a projector, and we are talking about engineers here. This year conferences went on Zoom which led to people talking for about 10 to 15 minutes while on mute, despite people telling them that they were muted. Hardly untouchable gods. Does not mean that the work that they do is not important, but they are just people. And let's not forget that for the most part the actual work is not done by the professors, but by their students.
And given the situation you people behaving, I'm not going to answer anymore replies on this thread.
Except this one.You are just digging a deeper hole for yourself. Now everyone who mocks you is not an original thinker like you think you are?
I think the source of the problem is that you grossly underestimate the forumites here or grossly overestimate whatever goes on in your head.
You start "don't argue with people on the internet" thread as if this is some kind of new revelation. People here know this very well for decades, some for centuries. You are out of your league and should be very careful and open to debate. Instead you started to argue with the first neutral replies as if they were attacking you personally - that's very poor thread hosting. This kind of newbie defensiveness has been seen here thousands of times and is so predictable and boring that even mocking it is boring.
I'd advise you to take a deep breath and engage with the natives in a positive manner. But past experience tells me you are likely to disregard good advice with "don't tell me what to do" attitude. At least I've tried.
People who "thinks" that they're mocking me, they're the rats of this forum and using TaleWorlds like a reddit platform and only thing they did was coming up, saying nothing, quoting my posts and putting GIFs and emojis. Yes, things could have been different if they discussed like a human, like Eddie.Now everyone who mocks you is not an original thinker like you think you are?
I don't underestimate people who shares their opinions, I will go with the second one and that's called having an idea.I think the source of the problem is that you grossly underestimate the forumites here or grossly overestimate whatever goes on in your head.
I have much from to learn these people since I'm making a mistake by taking you serious.People here know this very well for decades
So you admit you're a forum rat? Thinking that you can mock people on internet. (For the records, I'm asking him, not calling him that way)that's very poor thread hosting. This kind of newbie defensiveness has been seen here thousands of times and is so predictable and boring that even mocking it is boring.
“If you’re going to say what you want to say, you’re going to hear what you don’t want to hear.”I'd advise you to take a deep breath and engage with the natives in a positive manner.
Oh dear, oh dear, gorgeous. Sorry if I did offend you.I try to give you great advice, you reply by being offensive and argumentative. Serves me right, I guess.
Interesting how this never works. Mockery it is then.
Please do, I like reading your inane babble.That is another time's discussion. I will open a thread about it. Tomorrow or later on.
I'll try with a proverb for this one.Anyways, take care people. This is exact same version of reddit but name is "TaleWorlds off-topic"
2- ad hominem: Rather than focusing the argument. They will attack your personality; your age, your name, your looking and etc.
Question 1: Do you recognize Armenian Genocide?
Question 2: Where are you from?
Question 3: Has your country commited a genocide?
Question 4: If your country has commited a genocide; which one is it and did your country recognize it?
Question 5: If your country has commited a genocide and recognized it, did they pay subsidies or reparations to the country or nationality they commited suicide on?
Decide "MODERATORS"
From Page 1:↓ ↓ ↓
I don't say that you shan't argue or debate "EVERY" person in internet. I'm just telling you have to choose a civil person as much as you are to debate.