I've started coming here just to read what CANTON writes. It's pure gold.
1) I have played a lot of Warband multiplayer (2k hours), and I think we can all agree that it was a failure. It never reached the playerbase of a game like CS:GO. Bannerlord, in it's first week of release, did have those numbers. So, yeah, Bannerlord clearly has something Warband never could've.
Never ever saw you on Warband. Your 2k hours are either roleplaying on NW or being unnoticable on TDM. If you come from NW then
Bannerlord can absolutely surpass Warband, but to suggest that is already has in mind numbingly naive and just downright biased.I played in Australia, you buffoon. It hasn't even been a year since I moved to NA.
Once again, you reveal how narrow your thought process is. Though your perspective is valid, it is not the objective truth. Were you to acknowledge this, you'd understand that Bannerlord is an excellent sequel. Arguably, it surpasses warband in every respect.
Id like to turn this into an actual discussion
1) I have played a lot of Warband multiplayer (2k hours), and I think we can all agree that it was a failure. It never reached the playerbase of a game like CS:GO. Bannerlord, in it's first week of release, did have those numbers. So, yeah, Bannerlord clearly has something Warband never could've.
Oh man that bait is a juicy one, any bites?Cassic warband purists. These people are just washed up boomers who don't want to learn a new game
Oh man that bait is a juicy one, any bites?