-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Beta Patch Notes e1.4.3
- Thread starter Callum
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
I hope those will be worth downloading the beta for MP.
Consul_Kaiser
Veteran
They seriously need to bring the MP back, at the moment its dead AF
Lesbosisles
Knight at Arms
I wonder why are those sliders turned off in the first place
Same, I see absolutely no reason why we shouldn't have access to this feature. I mean, if it isn't part of the vision for the game; fine. But atleast don't put in measures to block us from accessing these features through modding.
i doubt they are inherently trying to stop you using them through mods - probably an unintended part of the update - still I think they are planning to use them; just later on.
So now updates will arrive much sooner?
ProudArabian
Recruit
Read it and seems like complaining to me lil boiRead what I wrote again, stop getting triggered at random things, flaming people
Cheers, this makes much more sense. I guess they separated the models into different tpac files to make them load faster into the game on demand, to avoid GPU overload. - Just a guess though.
@mexxico is there part where is code refactoring heavily focused at? Not sure if you are the correct person to ask though but, apart from one line, I'm not seeing any of my three mods got any build error, meaning that refactoring wasn't spread much in the entire codebase or handled very cautiously not to break anything further on purpose.
They aim a patch per week. Refactor took a lot of their time however i suppose its safe to say everything is back to normal.
After playing on e1.4.3, I noticed some bugs... So:
1.
The right world map with snow, just it does not match with the rest of the map.
2.
This chair is still buggy. I can't sit on it. This is an old bug!
3.
On sturgian tournaments, I always get like 50 fps, no matter how many units we re in tournament. I got an solid PC, i don t think I should have thos FPS.
In addition, I want to ask you Devs, if you have plans for implementing BANNERS, and when i give orders to my units, they are all silent. Please make them shout, like in a real battle. We got an mod like that, but why dont you add this. This will be an big improvement for the feel of the battles. Thanks!
1.
The right world map with snow, just it does not match with the rest of the map.
2.
This chair is still buggy. I can't sit on it. This is an old bug!
3.
On sturgian tournaments, I always get like 50 fps, no matter how many units we re in tournament. I got an solid PC, i don t think I should have thos FPS.
In addition, I want to ask you Devs, if you have plans for implementing BANNERS, and when i give orders to my units, they are all silent. Please make them shout, like in a real battle. We got an mod like that, but why dont you add this. This will be an big improvement for the feel of the battles. Thanks!
+1 HUGE immersion booster for relatively cheap cost
Does this mean that the next patch on the main, there will be more things regarded to Clan & Dynasties on the matters of succession for existing factions and the player created kingdom? Permanent death will be implemented right and now will be a real thing: old age and combat death?
One thing that i'm anxious to know is about the succession on the existing kingdoms, my clan can ascend to power in an existing one, beocme the royal house?
Nice update... As soon as possible and as soons as I can and work permit... I'll go back to playing
Totally unplayable!!
@Callum @Duh_TaleWorlds @mexxico
Hey Team,
Thanks for all of the hard work getting the refactor completed.
Who is in charge of the perk tree development and updates? I would like to pass on a few points regarding the perk trees and dont want to bog this thread down with it. There are a lot of people who are excited about perk updates, while I'm sure just as many who have different priorities =D.
With that stated I would like to request that health required to be considered "Ready for battle" be adjusted to a static minimum number (20hp) rather than a percentage (20%). There are multiple perks that provide more HP. When a character is reduced to less than 20% health they become too injured to fight. Base character hit point is at 100. If injured, that character has to have at least 20hp to participate in a battle.
However, a particularity strong or healthy character (ei, perks that have increased health) takes longer to be considered battle worthy. At 150hp 20% now becomes 30hp needed to get into battle.This is a fundamental issue with the wounded mechanic and is actually a reason I try to avoid anything that adds health to my character.
I've also noticed that the athletic perk Strong Arms provides an option to increase focus in the throwing tree. It is a tier 9 option (225 skill points). What happens to that if I already have 5 points of focus in throwing, do I get a hidden +6 focus effect or is it lost? If I was playing a dedicated throwing infantry unit, I would likely have already invested in the 5 point focus by the time 225 skill points have been accumulated. I understand that being athletically fit would directly impact other things such as your ability to throw, or fight. This skill, hover, seems to be better suited for the throwing tree directly, or should be available earlier in the tree. I know the throwing tree has not been revamped yet, so maybe this will be clearer once that happens?
There is a similar effect in tier 3: "Having Going". It increased persuasion chance and party size. It seems like the intent is an increased charisma for being fit? "Having Going" unfortunately didn't translate well. Maybe titled:
"Athletic Charm"
"Fit Leader"
"Conditioned Charisma"
Thanks for the consideration.
Hey Team,
Thanks for all of the hard work getting the refactor completed.
Who is in charge of the perk tree development and updates? I would like to pass on a few points regarding the perk trees and dont want to bog this thread down with it. There are a lot of people who are excited about perk updates, while I'm sure just as many who have different priorities =D.
With that stated I would like to request that health required to be considered "Ready for battle" be adjusted to a static minimum number (20hp) rather than a percentage (20%). There are multiple perks that provide more HP. When a character is reduced to less than 20% health they become too injured to fight. Base character hit point is at 100. If injured, that character has to have at least 20hp to participate in a battle.
However, a particularity strong or healthy character (ei, perks that have increased health) takes longer to be considered battle worthy. At 150hp 20% now becomes 30hp needed to get into battle.This is a fundamental issue with the wounded mechanic and is actually a reason I try to avoid anything that adds health to my character.
I've also noticed that the athletic perk Strong Arms provides an option to increase focus in the throwing tree. It is a tier 9 option (225 skill points). What happens to that if I already have 5 points of focus in throwing, do I get a hidden +6 focus effect or is it lost? If I was playing a dedicated throwing infantry unit, I would likely have already invested in the 5 point focus by the time 225 skill points have been accumulated. I understand that being athletically fit would directly impact other things such as your ability to throw, or fight. This skill, hover, seems to be better suited for the throwing tree directly, or should be available earlier in the tree. I know the throwing tree has not been revamped yet, so maybe this will be clearer once that happens?
There is a similar effect in tier 3: "Having Going". It increased persuasion chance and party size. It seems like the intent is an increased charisma for being fit? "Having Going" unfortunately didn't translate well. Maybe titled:
"Athletic Charm"
"Fit Leader"
"Conditioned Charisma"
Thanks for the consideration.
