Suggestion to the admin or admins deciding tournament format:
While divisions are fine, we're on a state on the scene where we shouldn't split, but stack as many teams as we can on the same playground, specially in the months to come. It's not only bad for a tournament with prize pool were people is smart enough to half-stack and pick 'division B' but also for the current scene state. You can always provide incentive with a progressive system which could also include divisions, but that connect later on through Knockout Stage where top 16 is involved, and match ups for Div C and B scale difficulty gradually based on placements on divisions ladder.
It's just not good to split the community, but also award someone who didn't earn it while dragging down bottom of division A, B and C.
You could keep divisions and connect all the teams into a wider Knockout Stage, as said, Would've liked to play teams in the last tournament but we were split into 2 completely different tournaments and this division system wouldn't feel any different if some teams as seen, could easily be A but choose B instead to fight for some welcomed prize.
(Hope you consider this or at least reply with some reasoning)
to be clear, and I am directing this to both you and Alyss, we did not decide to make a senate team after seeing the prize. Matt and I were planning on making this team since we first heard about the tournament some weeks ago because we wanted to play with the Senate again. we told Habi a while ago that we wouldn’t be playing in his team for this tournament unless it had a major prize. the prize isn’t major so we kept going with the Senate team. i fully intend to play the Senate players equally with the ‘stack’ you’re referring to, since the only reason I make Senate teams is because I like playing with my friends.
I also do not see how our team is remotely close to being stacked:
Inf - Gibby, Puff, Cobra, Hrod, CTH
Archer - Matt, Mandingo, Snacc
Cav - Ciiges, Slade, Mandingo, Hrod