Oh, my! Is that really you? We knew in a mobile game a couple of years ago, I lived in the friary at that time. It's good to see you, hope you are okTotally agree
Oh, my! Is that really you? We knew in a mobile game a couple of years ago, I lived in the friary at that time. It's good to see you, hope you are okTotally agree
So which is it. Mongols invaded and sacked many cities causing refugees to come and create Moscow or did Moscow already exist, get destroyed and people came BACK and repopulated?
Either one = you either being wrong, or using an example that does not even apply.
Name a time when Vikings/Brits were REFUGEES going into other lands. "a person who flees to a foreign country or power to escape danger or persecution".
And no, using the Cumans as an example of Hungary being like Rome is not correct because the man that granted the Cumans SANCTUARY (Not citizenship thus wrong example anyway) LED THE CUMANS FIRST, to take HUNGARY. Clearly does not apply to Rome because ROME existed, and took over others, granting THEM what we are talking about. It does not apply.
People have been saying "modders will fix it" for every bad mechanic for literal years, with not a single modder saying they would be willing to make all these changes. The thing is that modders do what they do for fun, and fixing bugs and adding basic mechanics is not fun. I'm a modder and I don't want to touch bannerlord with a barge pole, to be honest.
Hmm. I very rarely play games on mobile, especially the complex ones with anyone else. But had played couple of them for a short time. What game it was?Oh, my! Is that really you? We knew in a mobile game a couple of years ago, I lived in the friary at that time. It's good to see you, hope you are ok
Can't remember the name, it was something on the lines of Rise of Kingdoms. I was your second in command in a guild you found, and we managed to stay in the top ten for a whileHmm. I very rarely play games on mobile, especially the complex ones with anyone else. But had played couple of them for a short time. What game it was?
I don't recall saying anything about Moscow's creation. I'm not sure if English is your second language, but both those sentences you quoted say the same thing, only phrased differently.
a little known settlement named Moscow that no one has ever heard of since.
Asked and answered: Anglo-Varangians: the reason they showed up in the 11th century was due to the Norman takeover of England and obviously being on the losing side, they chose to go elsewhere.
I explicitly did not use it as a example of citizenship. Read the words I write before you reply to them.
3..next to no other European power allowed the places they conquered to come settle in their city and even grant many of them citizen status.
That's just a bit of subtle humor. It reads perfectly fine to a native speaker.Your argument could go either way with your wording. You either believed that Moscow was not known before, or not known after. Yet both are incorrect because Moscow was a major settlement before, and after the Mongol invasions.
Again, you are attempting to ignore the argument. Refguees are not mercinaries going elsewhere for employment. Where is the POPULATION fleeing into another nation from the political body of their former home.
Now quick, go look for some notation somewhere from a single persons diary of them fleeing a kingdom and settling elsewhere as proof of a population movement...at this point its clear you are just arguing to argue and will not actually come up with anything to defend your stance.
In the game, I think something like this should definitely exist where "dead" factions still live on as bands of mercenaries.
That's just a bit of subtle humor. It reads perfectly fine to a native speaker.
Asked and answered again: Norse-Scots in the 13th century.
It was proven incorrect the first time it was said. Repeating it shows ignorance.
What he said was sarcasm, man. Of course he knows Moscow is and was a major settlement.A native speaker of what? Not English. People that speak English do not form arguments that could be the opposite of what is being said especially if BOTH do not prove intent.
If population became a thing and manpower becomes a scarce resource like IRL then maybe sending your serfs to die without shields would suddenly make a lot less sense
You never replied to the example I gave of the Norse-Scots.
Why do I need to refute yet ANOTHER incorrect example? So you can give a 4th one that does not apply? The vikings were INVADING England, being driven OUT does not make them REFUGEES.
? why are you bothering? You clearly do not know what the word means, you have failed to use it correctly 3 times now and all while providing other example you yourself admitted was not even in context of what you were claiming to refute (citizenship). Time to move on.