A treatise written by someone with more intellect and less bias than yourself.
All you're doing is spouting ad hominems and nonsense at this point.
Hyping a random viking and a random viking manual, while at the same time belittling the most prolific and proficient duelist in the history of dueling. Repeatedly claiming that Musashi said that spears were better for battlefield combat when he specifically stated that long or heavy weapons (read: spears are long) lose to dual katana/ katana and waz. Claiming that he lived in a time of peace (which wouldn't necessarily have any bearing on his skill or knowledge) when he lived half of his life in the most war-torn era of Japanese history, i.e. the Warring States Era. You've become joke tier, friend.
Posting cherry picked pictures isn't helping your case.
Twisting statements, taking statements out of context, outright lying... you must be desperate to release some pent up energy at this point. May I suggest a stroll outside? It helps burn off some steam.
Open a separate thread and I can go into the explanations on why MIDERN JAPANESE HISTORIANS BASICALLY CONCLUDE Musashi was a "LARP."
None of his statements are corroborated by actual cross-referencing of historical sources, whereas a lot of other swordsmen and their feats and achuevements can be checked for validity.
Musashi, is a popular fantasy. Actual researchers put Kamiizumi Nobutsna and Tsukahara Bokuden a lot higher in the list of capable swordsmen, while Musashi is mostly considered "result of talented self PR."