EhBig McLarge-Huge said:And then there's Ah_Zhou for basically everything he's done up till now.
I just don't feel that there's any reason for me to keep posting when I don't have much to say.
EhBig McLarge-Huge said:And then there's Ah_Zhou for basically everything he's done up till now.
This is deceptively scummy. Orgasmo's reasoning goes as follows: "Everyone who checked in complained about his posting. Some of them want to vote for him. This means Bowser is not a wolf." If anything, this is evidence that Bowser is a wolf. His posting style is a cover for other players, including possible packmates in the event he is a wolf - they allow individuals to "contribute" input and distance themselves without putting down anything concrete. I don't know if the post is just wrong or scummy.I still think Bowser is a bad lynch choice. I counted 10 out of the 12 players who have checked-in as having complained about his posting and expressed suspicions about it (i.e. everyone expect Bowser himself and me), and most of them seem to be willing to vote for him. "8 to lynch" with only 12 active players should be hard to reach, but we hit that waaaay too easily with Bowser, which I think should give everyone pause. For Bowser to be a wolf, his packies would either have to be the three players who have not checked-in yet, players completely willing to bus him early on - both of which I find highly unlikely.
No you. I will not stand idle and let you accuse me of being silly. I daresay that it is not I, but YOU, who is silly! I'm not buying into any of those arguments.Lord Kelsier said:Archer is silly
Lord Kelsier said:He catches on to something very real with Bowser
Is this the truth of it then? Is this Bowser the obvious wolf you are looking for?Lord Kelsier said:13. King Bowser - I have no material here. Bowser's spent the game lecturing players and posting obnoxious nonsense in a ridiculous font.
Orgasmo said:Nope. What does an innocent have to gain from stating the obvious?
Bodrax said:I think this is a bit different from "Oh noes, we lost the seer" but I see your point.
It wasn't a "blatant attempt", I just did it. Even if there's nothing empirical to gain, why would an innocent not state the obvious? The designation "overlooked younger brother" is - in my opinion, at least - ridiculous and worthy of a bad joke; and I was left with the impression that the Seer is really important for the town, so saying "oh noes, we lost the Seer" once that happens also seems perfectly natural to me.Bodrax said:And yet you've missed Lumos' blatant attempt at doing the same thing.
Even if there's nothing empirical to gain, why would an innocent not state the obvious?
Orgasmo said:So you have no idea about Bowser, but just assume that because I was strongly defending him, he is a wolf too? Wouldn't it make more sense to vote for him then, because my being a wolf hinges on his being a wolf? You are also clearly aware that I am a veteran player, but think I am going to ardently defend a packie instead of rolling with the wagon? I'm won't go into how you are additionally misrepresenting my arguments on top of this, given I don't have the time to right now.
Orgasmo said:I think you are the one twisting words and reality.
And if Bowser is innocent?
This could easily be seen as a "hey look at my vote, I am not packmate!"King Bowser said:Unvote: Teofish
Vote: Orgasmo, the enchanted Dildo
Vote: Bolo_the_BearPharaoh X Llandy said:"I am sure you will all do your best to make Bolo feel welcome here."