Bigger, better, WNL matches.
- Thread starter Sir_Bertran.
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
just my personal opinion
started to play tournaments in this game a very long time ago, and i had more fun playing 10v10 or 12v12 instead of 8v8, that's all
e zitto tu duken jewken che non fai un cazzo al leonardo
started to play tournaments in this game a very long time ago, and i had more fun playing 10v10 or 12v12 instead of 8v8, that's all
e zitto tu duken jewken che non fai un cazzo al leonardo
just my personal opinion
started to play tournaments in this game a very long time ago, and i had more fun playing 8v8 instead of 12v12 or 10v10, that's all
started to play tournaments in this game a very long time ago, and i had more fun playing 8v8 instead of 12v12 or 10v10, that's all
ramboTotalWar said:just my personal opinion
started to play tournaments in this game a very long time ago, and i had more fun playing 10v10 or 12v12 instead of 8v8, that's all
e zitto tu duken jewken che non fai un cazzo al leonardo
Sir_Bertran.
Sergeant at Arms
Rules is good, and there's link, that 8 v 8 or more, if bouth clans agreed. But, my point is: I wish to play WNL mathces with 12 v 12 or bigger, so, I need to know witch clans would agreed, for choosing them, or to choosed by tham.Le Nazgul said:I haven't the time to put forward the arguments but for me, the currently rules are just perfect and there is absolutely nothing to change.
Sir_Bertran.
Sergeant at Arms
Interesting thoughts. But, once again: who want to play WNL match 12 v 12 or more with in?!
Well I have to say that when I was playing 10v10 back in the winter ENL I wasn't at the same level I am now, however I thought that the shift to 8v8 seemed to benefit the game in terms of the balance between infantry and the other classes. 10 v 10 seemed a bit worse for infantry which is what you would expect considering that infantry should suffer from the worst scaling laws because of their short range and limited mobility.
In terms of professional tournaments, I don't think 8v8 is undo-able but it would certainly be difficult for a large number of teams to be present at a lan event. Potential solutions could be to limit the lan side to the round of 8 and above or to have a single representative of each team be present. The latter was what was used by the recent forays by sony into e-sports for planetside 2. Can't say that event looked like a success but the game is facing the same problems as warband so is maybe worth watching to see if they find a solution.
In terms of professional tournaments, I don't think 8v8 is undo-able but it would certainly be difficult for a large number of teams to be present at a lan event. Potential solutions could be to limit the lan side to the round of 8 and above or to have a single representative of each team be present. The latter was what was used by the recent forays by sony into e-sports for planetside 2. Can't say that event looked like a success but the game is facing the same problems as warband so is maybe worth watching to see if they find a solution.
Sir_Bertran.
Sergeant at Arms
Azzar! Someone can understand my horrible english!Shoxi said:
Good players (very often forum posters) prefer 8 vs 8 because it doesnt force them to mix with low skill people, and they have individually a higher impact on the match result, compared to 10vs10 when it depends more about fate.
So yeah 10vs10 was more fun, but it was also too hard to organize for team callers without whom nothing in that game could be done.
Now with 8 vs 8 new teams can pop up more easily, it is easier to gather people, so it brings fresh air to the game. I am sure the ladder system will also contribute to that freshness, compared to an unflexible league of 8 pro-team with always the same faces.
Though if we only take into account the fun once the match has started 10vs10 is better : more butchery, more killing in the back that insolent pro-player, more getting banged by 5 nord infantry right from the beginning etc etc. The more you diminish the size of the team the more the game turns into Warband Esport aka abusing game flaws with pike stun bumpstab and other bull****.
It is all a question of gameyism vs romanticism.
So yeah 10vs10 was more fun, but it was also too hard to organize for team callers without whom nothing in that game could be done.
Now with 8 vs 8 new teams can pop up more easily, it is easier to gather people, so it brings fresh air to the game. I am sure the ladder system will also contribute to that freshness, compared to an unflexible league of 8 pro-team with always the same faces.
Though if we only take into account the fun once the match has started 10vs10 is better : more butchery, more killing in the back that insolent pro-player, more getting banged by 5 nord infantry right from the beginning etc etc. The more you diminish the size of the team the more the game turns into Warband Esport aka abusing game flaws with pike stun bumpstab and other bull****.
It is all a question of gameyism vs romanticism.
Don't make Goldair participate in 2v2 though.
MihaWkdekeller
Recruit
You can pick swadia btw we they got too much ppl to fight
- Status
