Author Topic: The Schemes of Forts and more.  (Read 1897 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Helge

  • Sergeant at Arms
  • *
    • View Profile
    • youtube channel
  • Faction: Nord
  • MP nick: Helge
The Schemes of Forts and more.
« on: June 17, 2012, 11:37:53 AM »
Have found something interesting for map makers.

The Schemes of Fortifikatsionnye of the V-XII centuries in France and Britain:
(click to show/hide)


The schemes of Fortifikatsionnye of the V-XII centuries in Italy and Germany.
(click to show/hide)

The schemes of Fortifikatsionnye of the VII - XII centuries:
(click to show/hide)


Forts of ancient Germen and Celts:
(click to show/hide)


Forts of the most ancient times:
(click to show/hide)

Birka:
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Garnison Hill:
(click to show/hide)

Trelleborg:
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)


Castle Dore in Cornwall:
(click to show/hide)

The fortress of Fyrkat in Denmark:
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

Aggersborg:
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

Fyrkat Port (i'm working on this one):
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

Montségur (1204):
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

King Canute's Viking Fortress:
(click to show/hide)

Anglo Saxon fortress:
(click to show/hide)

Pilsbury Castle, Derbyshire:
(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 12:00:33 PM by Helge »

Dragomir

  • Knight
  • *
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegir
  • MP nick: Dragomir_FenrisBarn
  • WB
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2012, 12:36:38 PM »
This topic could use some Slavic forts too ;) Too bad I only know the Polish ones, anyone with knowledge of Rus forts?

Gniezno (capital in these times):
(click to show/hide)
As it was in 11th century - after the christianisation of Poland in 966 (note the church). The stone house in the highest part was of course where the Prince (and later king) and his family would live (rest of the buildings are for servants).

Biskupin (most famous settlement):
(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 12:39:43 PM by Dragomir »
What doth love be?
Infant, beith hurting me not...
Beith hurting me not...
No longer.

Helge

  • Sergeant at Arms
  • *
    • View Profile
    • youtube channel
  • Faction: Nord
  • MP nick: Helge
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2012, 12:48:40 PM »
Nice one :)
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 12:51:20 PM by Helge »

Orchid

  • Sergeant Knight
  • *
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Rhodok
  • MP nick: Wigmund
  • M&BWBWF&SNW
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2012, 02:47:03 PM »
This topic could use some Slavic forts too ;) Too bad I only know the Polish ones, anyone with knowledge of Rus forts?

Biskupin (most famous settlement):
(click to show/hide)
Biskupin is highly anachronistic for Vikingr though, seeing as it's a Central European Hallstat C and D settlement (early and middle Iron Age).

Dragomir

  • Knight
  • *
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegir
  • MP nick: Dragomir_FenrisBarn
  • WB
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2012, 02:52:26 PM »
After some further research I must agree. As awesome as it looks, it was built in 738 BC, so that's about 1500 years too early. I guess the settlement was still there, but in completely different form. Gniezno might still be an awesome siege map though, with all the town levels and church on the way up :P
What doth love be?
Infant, beith hurting me not...
Beith hurting me not...
No longer.

Aklis

  • Sergeant at Arms
  • *
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nord
  • MP nick: Hergeirr the Clever
  • WBWF&S
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2012, 03:21:25 PM »
After some further research I must agree. As awesome as it looks, it was built in 738 BC, so that's about 1500 years too early. I guess the settlement was still there, but in completely different form. Gniezno might still be an awesome siege map though, with all the town levels and church on the way up :P

Hm. Maybe for an event? It looks a bit big for regular play.

Úlfr

  • Sergeant Knight at Arms
  • *
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Neutral
  • M&BWBWF&SNW
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2012, 07:18:52 PM »
yeey and we need slavic and celtic forts : )

Takeda_Shingen

  • Knight at Arms
  • *
  • Brothers-In-Arms and Best Friends to the Fyrninga
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nord
  • MP nick: Visquens Willelme d'Iveri
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2012, 11:09:50 PM »
Anglo Saxon fortress:
(click to show/hide)

That is not a Anglo Saxon Fortress, I swear it. That is a Norman Motte and Bailey.


FrisianDude

  • Coitus non Awesome
  • Grandmaster Knight
  • *
  • Zis is Tshörman tärritorie!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Neutral
  • MP nick: OLL_SirAndelot/Liudulf Ward
  • M&BWB
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2012, 09:15:48 PM »
It *is* a motte and bailey, but not necessarily Norman. I thought Anglo-Saxons/Engle used them as well, see.
Nords ruled by King Ragnar, Khergits ruled by Sanjar Khan, Rhodoks ruled by King Graveth, Swadians ruled by King Harlaus, Vaegirs ruled by King Yaroglek. All those peoples live, fight, and die in the continent of Calradia. The Nords and Rhodoks field solely infantry and archers, the Swadians and Vaegirs have infantry, archers and cavalry and the Khergit field almost exclusively cavalry. No such things as "infarty" or "calvary" exist. Play Vikingr!

sotijalo

  • Squire
  • *
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Neutral
  • MP nick: Fintan Fer Araig
  • WBWF&S
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2012, 09:54:57 PM »
Isn't that just like one map we already have?
When the wound is cut deep
So shall the brave man weep

How are we supposed to keep
From falling to eternal sleep
The climb is so steep
It's only one tiny leap
From light to darkness deep

Takeda_Shingen

  • Knight at Arms
  • *
  • Brothers-In-Arms and Best Friends to the Fyrninga
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nord
  • MP nick: Visquens Willelme d'Iveri
Re: The Schemes of Forts and more.
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2012, 08:06:37 AM »
It *is* a motte and bailey, but not necessarily Norman. I thought Anglo-Saxons/Engle used them as well, see.

I am not too sure if the Engle had motte and baileys, I will check that out.

EDIT: No, Engle did not use Motte and Bailey, the Normans introduced it to the Engle when the Normans invaded and conquered England