Just a observation....

[WilhelmBusch]

I've noticed in last few Line Battle lately, that the union army have been outnumbered and sometime admin ask another confederate regiment to join the union. I was just wondering that do you guys need more Union regiment? My regiment members don't mind going union. We dont mind balancing out the faction, we love the game mostly not the faction. 

Thanks.

[Azrooh]

There's no need to, things fluctuate between union-dominated and confederate-dominated all the time. Trying to push it one way will likely just shove it back to union-dominated.
Plus, you guys get your own CS cavalry uniforms next patch, so there's another reason to stay Confederates

[Sgt.Feldsau]

Yeah you´re right, the Union needs some players. But I think they need new players, from mm russia or public players. If you have some people from mm russia regiments, they will bring more people to you (the 15th Alabama doesn´t really recruit anymore, because most of the new recruit come from mm russia by other players, who are in the regiment yet).
But the point is: The Union really needs more players, otherwise the confederacy can play with itself one time...

[romicus]

Yeah you´re right, the Union needs some players. But I think they need new players, from mm russia or public players. If you have some people from mm russia regiments, they will bring more people to you (the 15th Alabama doesn´t really recruit anymore, because most of the new recruit come from mm russia by other players, who are in the regiment yet).
But the point is: The Union really needs more players, otherwise the confederacy can play with itself one time...

I agree, it would be nice if the union got more guys

[George A. Custer]

It wouldn't be a good diea to switch to union, in my eyes first of all because you are cavalry , and it would mean there would be an overflow of Union cav.

I'm trying to get new recruits but it's hard these days everyone wants that DLC =S

[HandOGod]

Obviously alot of people are planning on getting the dlc. I plan on getting it too, however unless the dlc blows my mind, I will still play secession. Infact I see the dlc as a great place to recruit. As many of us are forming regiments on the dlc, there will be new recruits who will not have tried secession. Lets get them.

[George A. Custer]

Yea we the 5th michigan will be active on both. and maybe new potential recruits will join our seccesion LB's too =)

(btw Hando you just signed up for the cuirassiers.. led by bacon.. I smell fail-charges xD)

[HandOGod]

(btw Hando you just signed up for the cuirassiers.. led by bacon.. I smell fail-charges xD)

  It shall be interesting to see what happens. But I fear your nose must be plugged, we will never have a fail charge.



Edit: Famous Last Words right there

[George A. Custer]

yea, i mean any charge where I am in cannot be a fail-charge. anyway let's stop spamming this gentlemen's topic =)

[WilhelmBusch]

There's no need to, things fluctuate between union-dominated and confederate-dominated all the time. Trying to push it one way will likely just shove it back to union-dominated.
Plus, you guys get your own CS cavalry uniforms next patch, so there's another reason to stay Confederates

 

Ahh alright, well. All my men wanted to be infantry. (My loyal men are my best friend, we have unit/regiment together in any other games. So I'm always open my mind to my friends.) So, they said they grew tired of being Cavalry because theyre basically tired of being wiped out at the start. (our fault actually lol) But now they want try infantry and they find it really fun. So, we are 24th Georgia Infantry now. Sorry that we are now one less confederate cavalry, but i've seen more confederate cavalry/rangers being set up now.