0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Be coo'! Roll with a nice 17th C. name, English preferred, and join up with us if you see any of our members on Tawerna. It'll be hard for you to keep up with volleys and movements, I suppose but at least you'll grasp what we're doing.
Don't want to disrupt you, but shouldn't threads about clans or regiments be placed in a proper board?
I guess there's no need in such regiment until we have kilts and broadswords
Honestly I don't think claymores, bows and kilts for Scottish mercenaries are very historicaly accurate. I think they even didn't wear any clothes which differed them from any other mercenaries.
you may be right about clothes, though kilt would look better, but Scottish mercenaries indeed had broadswords from their homeland
Quote from: Deithwen on March 10, 2012, 04:08:58 PMyou may be right about clothes, though kilt would look better, but Scottish mercenaries indeed had broadswords from their homelandThey can take only bow's from they homeland. Nothing more. Sometimes They come in kilt's, but quickly abandon this.
Quote from: b@rtu$ on March 10, 2012, 04:15:15 PMQuote from: Deithwen on March 10, 2012, 04:08:58 PMyou may be right about clothes, though kilt would look better, but Scottish mercenaries indeed had broadswords from their homelandThey can take only bow's from they homeland. Nothing more. Sometimes They come in kilt's, but quickly abandon this.that's obviously not true, the soldiers were used to these "claymores" which are actualy basket-hilted broadswords and they used it whatever side they fought on. Actually Scotsmen were quite known for using that kind of sword